Inovação e economia circular no sistema prisional: uma análise dos 10r’s

Patricia Mayer Veiga; Simone  Sehnem; Ana Cláudia Lara Crizel; Marcelo Guerreiro Crizel; Sady Mazzioni

doi:10.47456/bjpe.v11i3.49080

Authors

Patricia Mayer Veiga Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina Author
Simone Sehnem Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2416-4881
Ana Cláudia Lara Crizel Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-7246
Marcelo Guerreiro Crizel Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8479-2399
Sady Mazzioni Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8976-6699

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v11i3.49080

Keywords:

Circular Economy, Prison System, Innovation, Sustainability, 10Rs

Abstract

Este estudo investiga a aplicação das estratégias dos 10R como alternativa impulsionada por inovação para o avanço da economia circular em penitenciárias estaduais de Santa Catarina. Adota-se um estudo de caso único e qualitativo, triangulando dados de revisão sistemática da literatura, 16 entrevistas semiestruturadas com gestores prisionais e observações diretas. Os resultados indicam que, embora existam práticas sustentáveis isoladas, há carência de coordenação institucional, sensibilização de stakeholders e capacitação técnica. A inovação tecnológica, ferramentas digitais e a reorganização de rotinas organizacionais são identificadas como facilitadores da circularidade. Conclui-se que a transição para a economia circular requer abordagem sistêmica com infraestrutura tecnológica e engajamento contínuo.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Patricia Mayer Veiga, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina

-
Simone Sehnem , Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina

Post-doctorate by FGV with a period of data collection in Scotland and England (2016 to 2018). Certified in Administration and Tourism for Univali/SC (2011). Master in Administration at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (2007). Graduation in Agribusiness from the Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina - Campus de São Miguel do Oeste (2005) and graduation in Administration from the Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (2010). É Bolsista Produtividade PQ-2 Cnpq. She works as Professor and Researcher at UNOESC and UNISUL. At the Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) we do not have an Academic Degree in Administration and we do not have a Professional Master in Administration who develop studies in the Lines of Sustainability Research, Entrepreneurship and Territorial Dynamics and Sustainability and Organizations. Minister of disciplines in the area of sustainability. The research interests are: circular economy, sustainable supply chain management, sustainability as a strategic factor, disruptive innovation, sustainable operations, education for sustainability, governance structure, integration system, agribusiness, production chain and organizational networks. Technical and technological research and production are focused on environmental aspects of organizations, strategic management for sustainability, circular economy and disruptive innovation. Minister of classrooms in post-graduation courses lato sensu in the area of Research Methodology, Environmental Management, Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental Aspects in Agribusiness, Environmental Performance Indicators in Organizations, Sustainable Leadership, Project Management and Sustainability in Organizations. No Master and Doctorate in Administration of the Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL) in Florianópolis/SC ministers to the disciplines of Research Methodology in Administration, Qualitative Research in Administration and Sustainability Management in Organizations. It currently coordinates the Circular Economy Nucleus whose headquarters are at Unoesc Chapecó.
Ana Cláudia Lara Crizel, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó

Ph.D. in Administration (UNOESC). Postdoctoral Researcher at the Postgraduate Program in Accounting and Administration Sciences (PPGCCA – UNOCHAPECO). Federal public servant at the Federal University of Fronteira Sul (UFFS). Her professional experience includes public management, planning, and procurement. Her research interests include sustainability, circular economy, leadership, and innovation.
Marcelo Guerreiro Crizel, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó

PhD in Environmental Sciences from PPGCA-UNOCHAPECÓ (2023). Level D employee (Chemistry Technician) at the Federal University of the Southern Border-UFFS/Chapecó-SC, working in the areas of infrastructure and environmental management. Graduated in the Technical Course in Chemistry with an emphasis on industrial process analysis from the Federal Center for Technological Education of Pelotas (2007), in the Bachelor's Degree in Industrial Chemistry from the Federal University of Pelotas (2013) and Master in Chemistry (2015) from the Postgraduate Program in Chemistry at the Federal University of Pelotas, developing activities in the areas of analytical, environmental, and food chemistry. He has experience in analytical chemistry, with an emphasis on the analysis of halogens, metals, and non-metals in food. He worked with sample preparation using decomposition-based systems using microwave irradiation (combustion and digestion under O2 pressure) to determine metals and non-metals using spectrometric techniques and non-metals using ion chromatography, as well as the determination of halogens using Ion Selective Electrode and Ion Chromatography techniques. He worked as a Technological Support Scholar (DTI), working on Gas Chromatography, Liquid Chromatography, Molecular Fluorescence, and Differential Scanning Calorimetry analyses in the Forensic Chemistry program at the Federal University of Pelotas. Furthermore, he works in the area of analytical chemistry, developing analytical methods and activities related to the determination of trace elements in biological samples and develops research activities with the Laboratory of Contaminant Control in Biomaterials and working with the synthesis of biodiesel from different oilseeds and the application of chalcones as antioxidants, an activity developed with the laboratory of bioactive heterocycles and bioprospecting, at the Federal University of Pelotas.
Sady Mazzioni, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó

Ph.D. in Accounting and Administration Sciences (FURB). Postdoctoral Researcher at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Full professor and coordinator of the Postgraduate Program in Accounting and Administration Sciences (PPGCCA – UNOCHAPECO). He has extensive experience in academic leadership and editorial activities. His research focuses on corporate social responsibility, ESG, and quality of accounting information.

References

Allwood, J. M., Ashby, M. F., Gutowski, T. G., & Worrell, E. (2011). Material efficiency: a white paper. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(3), 362-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo, SP: Edições 70.

Blackburn, R. (2004). Remanufacturing in the UK: A significant contributor to sustainable development? Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(8–10), 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.020

Braungart, M., & McDonough, W. (1998). The next industrial revolution. The Atlantic Monthly, 282(4), 82–92.

Brasil. (1984). Lei nº 7.210, de 11 de julho de 1984 (Lei de Execução Penal). Dispõe sobre a execução penal. Recuperado de https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l7210.htm

Brasil. (1940). Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940 (Código Penal Brasileiro). Recuperado de https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848compilado.htm

Brasil. (2005). Resolução nº 3, de 23 de setembro de 2005. Diretrizes básicas para arquitetura penal. Recuperado de https://www.gov.br/depen/pt-br/composicao/cnpcp/resolucoes/2011/diretrizes-basicas-para-arquitetura-penal.pdf

Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cossu, R., & Williams, I. D. (2015). Urban mining: Concepts, terminology, challenges. Waste Management & Research, 33(6), 478–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X15588305

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Opportunities for the consumer goods sector. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Towards the circular economy: The business rationale to accelerate the transition. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org

Francis, C. A., Lieblein, G., Gliessman, S. R., Breland, T. A., Creamer, N. G., Harwood, R. R., ... & Wiedenhoeft, M. H. (2003). Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 22(3), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v22n03_10

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interaction of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007

Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2014). Sustainable waste management: A case study of Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.013

Goodman, J., Korsunova, A., & Halme, M. (2017). Our collaborative future: Stakeholder roles and agendas in sustainability innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(6), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1941

Hultman, J., & Corvellec, H. (2012). The European waste hierarchy: From the sociomateriality of waste to a politics of consumption. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2413–2427. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44668

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

Kruglianskas, I., & Pinsky, V. (2018). Inovação tecnológica para a sustentabilidade: lições de sucessos e fracassos. Estudos Avançados, 31(90), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.3190008

Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042

Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112

Mies, A., & Gold, S. (2021). Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128960

Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2

Reike, D., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: New or refurbished as CE 3.0? Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027

Rodwell, M. K. (1994). Social work constructivist research. New York: Garland Publishing.

Roper, S., Hopkinson, P., Zils, M., & Hawkins, P. (2018). Managing a complex global circular economy business model: Opportunities and challenges. California Management Review, 60(3), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618764692

Santa Catarina. (2019). Lei Complementar nº 741, de 12 de junho de 2019. Dispõe sobre a estrutura organizacional básica da Administração Pública Estadual. Recuperado de http://leis.alesc.sc.gov.br/html/2019/741_2019_lei_complementar.html

Santa Catarina. (2021). Lei Complementar nº 774, de 27 de outubro de 2021. Dispõe sobre o Estatuto da Polícia Penal do Estado de Santa Catarina. Recuperado de http://leis.alesc.sc.gov.br/html/2021/774_2021_lei_complementar.html

Santa Catarina. (2022). Decreto nº 2.379, de 28 de dezembro de 2022. Aprova o Regimento Interno da Secretaria de Estado da Administração Prisional e Socioeducativa. Recuperado de https://leisestaduais.com.br/sc/decreto-n-2379-2022-santa-catarina-aprova-o-regimento-interno-da-secretaria-de-estado-da-administracao-prisional-e-socio-educational

Santa Catarina. (2007). Lei nº 14.003, de 3 de maio de 2007. Dispõe sobre o Conselho Penitenciário Estadual. Recuperado de http://leis.alesc.sc.gov.br/html/2007/14003_2007_Lei.html

Secchim, A. B., Freitas, R. R., & Gonçalves, W. (2018). Mapeamento e análise bibliométrica da utilização da análise envoltória de dados (DEA) em estudos de engenharia de produção. Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering, 4(2), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v4i2.24464

Valencia, M., Bocken, N. M. P., Loaiza, C., & Jaeger, S. (2023). The social contribution of the Circular Economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 408, 137082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137082

Vygotsky, L. S. (2001). A construção do pensamento e da linguagem. São Paulo, SP: Martins Fontes.

Yan, J., & Feng, C. (2014). Sustainable design-oriented product modularity combined with the 6R concept: A rotor laboratory bench case study. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0597-3

Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de caso: Planejamento e métodos (5ª ed.). Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman.