Metaphor and semantic change to the arrangement [V por terra]

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/rctl.v18i40.45142

Keywords:

Constructionalization, Metaphor, Grammar of diachronic constructions

Abstract

This article proposes an investigation of meaning changes to the arrangement [V por terra] in its constructionalization process, focusing on metaphorical meanings identified in uses that indicate semantic expansion. The theoretical basis that guided this research was the principles of Construction Grammar, a theory that understands the speaker's linguistic knowledge as a network of constructions, that is, FORM-MEANING pairs encompassing all linguistic levels. Additionally, the Conceptual Metaphor Theory guides us regarding the conventionalization of the metaphorical meanings of the arrangement [V por terra]. The corpus analyzed here is part of the genre/history of Corpus do Português (a large full-filled corpora of Portuguese) and comprises a set of 779 occurrences, distributed between the 14th to the 20th centuries. The study indicates that the arrangement [V por terra] went through a constructionalization process, provoking a new pairing between form and function. Therefore, the objectives are to analyze how diachronic transformations that affected meaning to the arrangement [V por terra] occurred and describe the contribution of metaphors in the process of change. The results indicate that the action of three primary metaphors in the process of semantic change was decisive. That means that TEMPO É ESPAÇO and RUIM É PARA BAIXO are two basic metaphors for conceptual mapping, and POR TERRA É RUÍNA /TÉRMINO is a metaphor that comes later, representing the most abstract functions of the arrangement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Morgana Fabiola Cambrussi, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS)

    Docente da Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, vinculada ao Curso de Graduação em Letras Português e Espanhol - Licenciatura e ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Linguísticos, nos quais orienta trabalhos de ensino, de pesquisa e de extensão. Doutora em Linguística pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2009).

  • Adriana Hoffmann, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS)

    Possui graduação em Letras - Português/Espanhol pela Fundação Universidade do Contestado - Campus Caçador (2003) e mestrado em Estudos Linguísticos pela Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (2014). Doutoranda em Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Campus Chapecó/SC. Docente do Ensino Básico, Técnico e Tecnológico do Instituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Videira/SC.

References

BARDDAL, J.; GILDEA, S. Diachronic construction grammar: epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In: BARDDAL, J. et al. (eds.). Diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2015. p. 1-50.

BYBEE, J. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

DIESSEL, H. The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

GOLDBERG, A. E. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.

GOLDBERG, A. E. Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, University of Illinois, v. 7, p. 219–224, 2003.

HILPERT, M. Constructional change in english: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

HILPERT, M. Ten lectures on diachronic construction grammar. Leiden: Brill, 2021.

HOFFMANN, T. From constructions to construction grammars. In: DANCYGIER, B. (ed.). The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. p. 284–309.

KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphor: a practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.

LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

SILVA, A. S. da. O poder cognitivo da metáfora e da metonímia. Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades, v. 7, fasc. 1-2, p. 13-75, 2003.

TRAUGOTT, E. C.; TROUSDALE, G. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Published

22-12-2024

Most read articles by the same author(s)