Energy recovery from macadamia husk via pyrolysis: a bibliometric review using the ProKnow-C method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21712/lajer.2026.v13.n2.p69-82

Keywords:

Pyrolysis; Hydrothermal Carbonization; Macadamia Shell.

Abstract

The growing demand for renewable energy sources drives the search for efficient methods to valorize biomass waste, such as macadamia shell, an agro-industrial byproduct with underutilized energy potential. This study aimed to systematically compare pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) as thermochemical conversion routes for macadamia shell, evaluating the properties of the solid products and their potential as biofuels. For this purpose, a bibliographic review methodology based on the ProKnow-C method was employed, allowing for the selection and in-depth analysis of a portfolio of ten relevant scientific articles.

The analysis results revealed that, although pyrolysis is effective in carbon concentration and increasing the higher heating value (HHV) of biochar, it tends to raise the ash content. In contrast, HTC proved to be particularly advantageous in significantly reducing ash content, producing a cleaner material, and retaining a larger fraction of the biomass's original energy, resulting in superior global energy efficiencies. Comparative analysis of combustion behavior indicated that pyrolytic biochar exhibits greater thermal stability, while hydrochar displays a two-stage combustion profile with higher initial energy release rates. It is concluded that the choice between pyrolysis and HTC for macadamia shell depends on the specific requirements of the final application, whether for a high-energy-density biofuel or a low-ash product. This work contributes to understanding the advantages and limitations of each process, providing insights for optimizing the energy valorization of this residue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp 959-975, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

El‐Fawal, E. M., Naggar, A. E. M. A., El-Zahhar, A., Alghandi, M. M., Morshedy, A. S., Sayed, H. E. A. and Mohammed, A. (2025). Biofuel production from waste residuals: comprehensive insights into biomass conversion technologies and engineered biochar applications. RSC Advances, 15, pp. 11942 - 11974. doi: 10.1039/d5ra00857c.

El-Sayed, S., Khass, T. M. and Mostafa, M. E. (2023). Thermal degradation behaviour and chemical kinetic characteristics of biomass pyrolysis using TG/DTG/DTA techniques. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14, pp. 17779 - 17803. doi: 10.1007/s13399-023-03926-2.

Gorshkov, A., Berezikov, N., Kaltaev, A., Yankovsky, S., Slyusarsky, K., Tabakaev, R. and Larionov, K. (2021). Analysis of the Physicochemical Characteristics of Biochar Obtained by Slow Pyrolysis of Nut Shells in a Nitrogen Atmosphere. Energies. doi: 10.3390/en14238075.

Hanandeh, E. A., Albalasmeh, A. and Gharaibeh, M. (2021). Effect of pyrolysis temperature and biomass particle size on the heating value of biocoal and optimization using response surface methodology. Biomass and Bioenergy. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106163.

Kipngetich, P., Kiplimo, R., Tanui, J. and Chisale, P. (2023). Effects of carbonization on the combustion of rice husks briquettes in a fixed bed. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2023.100608.

Lin, L., E, Y., Sun, Q., Chen, Y., Dai, W., Bao, Z., Niu, W. and Meng, J. (2024). Analysis of the Pyrolysis Kinetics, Reaction Mechanisms, and By-Products of Rice Husk and Rice Straw via TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Molecules, 30. doi: 10.3390/molecules30010010.

Liu, N., Huang, H., Huang, X., Li, R., Feng, J. and Wu, Y. (2024). Co-pyrolysis Behavior of Coal and Biomass: Synergistic Effect and Kinetic Analysis. ACS Omega, 9, pp. 31803 - 31813. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c03053.

Lozano, E. J., Martín-Lara, M., Blázquez, G., Muñoz‐Batista, M. J. and Calero, M. (2026). Enhancing biomass properties for biofuels: A comparative analysis of pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization technologies. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2025.107435.

Paudel, P. P., Park, S., Oh, K., Kim, S., Kim, S. Y., Kang, K. and Kim, D. H. (2025). Energy recovery from Ginkgo biloba urban pruning wastes: pyrolysis optimization and fuel property enhancement for high‐grade charcoal productions. Biofuels, 19. doi: 10.1002/bbb.70017.

Rambhatla, N., Panicker, T. F., Mishra, R. K., Manjeshwar, S. K. and Sharma, A. (2024). Biomass pyrolysis for biochar production: Study of kinetics parameters and effect of temperature on biochar yield and its physicochemical properties. Results in Engineering. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103679.

Published

09/03/2026

Issue

Section

Engenharias

How to Cite

Lopes Cosme, L. et al. (2026) “Energy recovery from macadamia husk via pyrolysis: a bibliometric review using the ProKnow-C method”, Latin American Journal of Energy Research, 13(2), pp. 69–82. doi:10.21712/lajer.2026.v13.n2.p69-82.