
186
Municipal Fiscal perForMance: Does the huMan capital Make a DiFFerence?
Gestão & Conexões (ManageMent and ConneCtions Journal). Vitória (Es), Vol. 13, n. 3, ago./noV. 2024.
some studies analyze the importance or influence of these variables in municipal
management, focusing on the executive branch, and testing their influence on IPTU
collection (Avellaneda, 2009; Avellaneda & Gomes, 2015, 2017); per capita spending
(Avellaneda, 2009); financial performance (Gomes et al., 2013; Silva & Sales, 2018;
Gallina et al., 2019); debts, expenses, and taxes (Freier & Thomasius, 2016) and fiscal
indicators (Rocha et al., 2018). However, these studies are limited to the HC of the
manager, in this specific case, the mayors who hold the political and administrative
functions (Avellaneda, 2009; Avellaneda & Gomes, 2017).
Avellaneda and Gomes (2015) investigated whether the size of the population,
education, and experience of the mayor are correlated with municipal performance,
which is represented by the average property tax per municipality, from 2005 to 2007.
The study sampled the 787 municipalities of the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil. The
results showed that the mayor's education and age influence the collection of IPTU.
According to Avellaneda and Gomes (2015), the HC of the manager affects
performance by influencing the strategic direction adopted. For the authors, Human
Capital may be more relevant in larger administrative units due to the demand for
greater management and coordination; managers would be less inclined to make
random decisions and more likely to make decisions focused on technical capacity.
Charges and legal consequences are weighed against administrative determinations
(Avellaneda & Gomes, 2015; Khanna, 2013). The history of research on HC about
performance in local administrations has focused on the capacity of managers as if
they were solely responsible for the good or bad results obtained.
For Demir and Reddick (2012), the functions of the executive and legislative
branches should be complementary. Their research is focused on the dichotomy
between administration and politics in local administrative structures in the USA,
configured by the council-manager regime (political x administrative), unlike Brazilian
local administrations, where the political function is shared between the executive and
the legislature, with only the administrative axis remaining as the central agenda and
function attributed to the executive. The context of their research becomes imperative
because it focuses on the fact that local powers should not be restricted to administrative
or political activities in isolation.
According to Wei (2020), interests in re-election channel time and resources into
strengthening political connections, whether with elected representatives, interest
niches, or electoral bases, and such processes, end up mitigating results or even
precluding more effective policies.
Like the board of directors, that protects the interests of shareholders, the
legislature must protect the interests of society by supervising management acts, by
the duties assigned by the Brazilian Federal Constitution (1988) and the LRF (2000).
From a governance perspective, the checks and balances between the executive
and the legislature are presented as steering, evaluation, and monitoring mechanisms
(Kissler & Heidemann, 2006; Lui, 2017; TCU, 2014). The relationships established
between the executive and the legislature are part of the governance process, and it
is important to realize that these interactions are aimed at balancing power, preventing