Profile of patients treated by the palliative care team in the gastroenterology ward of a tertiary hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/rbps.v26i1.51131Keywords:
Palliative Care, Gastroenterology, Functional Status, Patient Care TeamAbstract
Introduction: Palliative care is a competence of gastroenterology, considering mainly chronic diseases and neoplasms treated by the specialty. Care is often provided by the attending physician, but specialized professionals have a broader view of the needs and conduct with patients and caregivers. Objectives: To analyze requests for interconsultations with the palliative care team for patients with gastroenterological diseases in a tertiary hospital, for 01 year. Methods: Longitudinal, retrospective study, evaluating data from patients with interconsultations for palliative care, comparing with those without interconsultation. Results: only 10.1% of the 336 patients received interconsultations, answered within 24 hours. Patients with consultation-based intervention were older than the others (63.5 x 54.7 years – p<0.001), had a longer hospital stay (22 x 13 days – p<0.001), and there was no difference in gender. 42% died (15/34 x 15/302 – p<0.001). Only 16 of the 154 cirrhotic patients (10.4%) and 1 of the 32 patients with inflammatory bowel disease received consultation-based intervention, while 39.1% and 41.1% with neoplasia and cirrhosis associated with hepatocellular carcinoma were evaluated. Severely impaired clinical functionality was observed on 12/27 (44.5%). Discussion: Even though it is a hospital unit that has a palliative care team, the gastroenterology service requested few opinions for chronic and disabling diseases, a result not observed in the request for consultation-based intervention for oncological diseases. Conclusion: Increasing interdisciplinarity between gastroenterology and the team specialized in palliative care may provide shared objectives in improving quality of life, preventing and alleviating suffering, with an approach centered on the person with serious health-related suffering.
Downloads
References
Radbruch L, De Lima L, Knaul F, Wenk R, Ali Z, Bhatnaghar S, Blanchard C, et al. Redefining palliative care: a new consensus-based definition. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Oct;60(4):754–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.027
Knaul FM, Farmer PE, Krakauer EL, De Lima L, Bhadelia A, Jiang Kwete X, Alleyne GAO, et al. Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief—an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet. 2018;391(10128):1391–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32513-8
Kim S, Lee K, Kim C, Choi J, Kim S. How do we start palliative care for patients with end-stage liver disease? Gastroenterol Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr;45(2):101–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000611
Maciel MGS, tradutor. Palliative Performance Scale (PPSv2) version 2. In: Medical care of the dying. 4th ed. Victoria (BC): Victoria Hospice Society; 2006 [trad. 2009]. p.120. Disponível em: https://victoriahospice.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/pps_portuguese_brazilian_-_sample.pdf
Clara MGS, Silva VR, Alves R, Coelho MCR. The palliative care screening tool as an instrument for recommending palliative care for older adults. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2020;22:e190143. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562019022.190143
Rogal SS, Hansen L, Patel A, Ufere NN, Verma M, Woodrell CD, et al. AASLD practice guidance: palliative care and symptom-based management in decompensated cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2022;76:819–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.32378
Rivet EB, Bohl JL, Al Yassin S, Bickston SJ. Palliative care in inflammatory bowel disease: a new partnership. Crohn’s Colitis 360. 2021;3:otab062. https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otab062
Poonja Z, Brisebois A, van Zanten SV, Tandon P, Meeberg G, Karvellas CJ. Patients with cirrhosis and denied liver transplants rarely receive adequate palliative care or appropriate management. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;12(4):692–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.027
Rush B, Walley KR, Celi LA, Rajoriya N, Brahmania M. Palliative care access for hospitalized patients with end‐stage liver disease across the United States. Hepatology. 2017;66:1585–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29297
Kathpalia P, Smith A, Lai JC. Underutilization of palliative care services in the liver transplant population. World J Transplant. 2016;6:594–600. https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i3.594
Shinall MC, Karlekar M, Martin S, Gatto CL, Misra S, Chung CY, et al. COMPASS: a pilot trial of an early palliative care intervention for patients with end-stage liver disease. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019;58:614–22.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.06.023
Kaasa S, Loge JH, Aapro M, Albreht T, Anderson R, Bruera E, Brunelli C, et al. Integration of oncology and palliative care: a Lancet Oncology Commission. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):e588–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30415-7
Laube R, Sabih A, Strasser SI, Lim L, Cigolini M, Liu K. Palliative care in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;36:618–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15169
Zou WY, El-Serag HB, Sada YH, Temple SL, Sansgiry S, Kanwal F, et al. Determinants and outcomes of hospice utilization among patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in a Veterans Affairs population. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63:1173–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-4989-4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Health Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Saúde (RBPS) adopts the CC BY 4.0 license, which means that authors retain the copyright of the works they submit to the journal. Authors are responsible for declaring that their contribution is an original manuscript, that it has not been previously published, and that it is not under simultaneous review by another scientific journal. Upon submitting the manuscript, authors grant RBPS the exclusive right of first publication, subject to peer review.
Authors are permitted to enter into additional contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version published by RBPS (for example, in institutional repositories or as a book chapter), provided that due acknowledgment of authorship and of initial publication by RBPS is given. Authors are also encouraged to make their work available online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) after its initial publication in the journal, with due acknowledgment of authorship and of the original publication by RBPS.
Accordingly, under the CC BY 4.0 license, readers have the right to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially;
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
