O Império Bizantino (?) entre o negacionismo e a resiliência: esboço de uma história desfigurada

João Vicente de Medeiros Publio Dias

doi:10.29327/rom.v27i.49630

Authors

João Vicente de Medeiros Publio Dias Universidade Estadual do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29327/rom.v27i.49630

Keywords:

Roman Empire, Byzantine Empire, Late Antiquity, Denialism, Resilience

Abstract

This article proposes an exploratory study of the traditional separation between Roman History and Byzantine History, arguing that the Byzantine Empire should be understood as a transformed continuation of the Roman Empire rather than as a distinct entity. Based on an extensive bibliographical review and historiographical analysis, the article discusses how the use of the term “Byzantine” is linked to a persistent denial of the Eastern Romans’ claim to the Roman legacy, resulting from political, religious, and cultural disputes within the context of Latin Christendom and the West. By examining key historical moments, the text questions the validity of these traditional chronological milestones as points of rupture. Instead, it highlights the institutional, cultural, and identity continuity that the Eastern Romans (rhomaioi) themselves recognized in their own society. Such continuity was only possible through transformations and adaptations to new historical circumstances. By emphasizing the Empire’s resilience in the face of these changes, the article exposes historiographical prejudices rooted in Enlightenment thought and proposes a more integrated and dynamic perspective on the long durée of Late Antique and medieval Romanity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BEATON, R. The Greeks: A Global History. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.

BECK, H. G. Actus fide, Wege zum Autodafé. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte 1987, n. 3, p. 3-72, 1987.

BECK, H. G. Das byzantinische Jahrtausend. München: Beck, 1994.

BLECKMANN, B. Bemerkungen zum Scheitern des Mehrherrschaftssystems: Reichsteilung und Territorialansprüche. In: DEMANDT, A.; GOLTZ, A.; SCHLANGE-SCHÖNINGEN, H. (ed.). Diokletian und die Tetrarchie: Aspekte einer Zeitenwende. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004, p. 74-93.

CANDIDO DA SILVA, M. 4 de Setembro de 476: a queda de Roma. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 2006.

CORDOÑER, J. S.; SANTOS, F. J. A. La introducción al derecho (Eisagoge) del patriarca Focio. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 2007.

DAGRON, G. Aux origines de la civilisation byzantine: langue de culture et langue d’État. Revue Historique, v. 241, n. 1, p. 23-56, 1969.

DAGRON, G. Emperor and Priest: The Imperial Office in Byzantium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

DICIONÁRIO MICHAELIS. São Paulo: Melhoramentos, 2025.

DYSON, R. W. Medieval rulers and political ideology. In: LANSING, C.; ENGLISH, E. D. (ed.). Companion to the Medieval World. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, p. 354-371.

ERGUL, A. The Ottoman identity: Turkish, Muslim or Rum? Middle Eastern Studies, v. 48, n. 4, p. 629-645, 2012.

FÖGEN, M. T. Das politische Denken der Byzantiner. In: FETSCHER, I.; MÜNKLER, H. (ed.). Pipers Handbuch der Politischen Ideen. München: Piper, 1993, p. 41-85.

FORRAI, R. The sacred nectar of the deceitful Greeks: perceptions of Greekness in Ninth-Century Rome. In: SPEER, A.; STEINKRÜGER, P. (ed.). Knotenpunkt Byzanz: Wissensformen und kulturelle Wechselbeziehungen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, p. 71-84.

FRIGHETTO, R. Romanos, bárbaros e a história política na Antiguidade Tardia. Heródoto, v. 6, n. 2, p. 22-48, 2021.

FUNARI, P. P.; GRILLO, J. G. C. Os conceitos de “helenização” e de “romanização” e a construção de uma antiguidade clássica. In: ALMEIDA, N. B.; NEME, A. L.; PINHEIRO, R. (org.). A construção da narrativa histórica: séculos XIX e XX. São Paulo/Campinas: Editora Fap-Unifesp/Editora da Unicamp, 2014, p. 205-214.

GEORGACAS, D. J. The names of Constantinople. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, v. 78, p. 347-367, 1947.

GUARINELLO, N. L. Ordem, integração e fronteiras no Império Romano: um ensaio. Mare Nostrum, v. 1, n. 1, p. 113-127, 2010.

HALDON, J. Iconoclasia em Bizancio: mitos e realidade. Anales de Historia Antigua, Medieval y Moderna, v. 42, p. 55-68, 2010.

HERRIN, J. Formation of Christendom. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.

KALDELLIS, A. Hellenism in Byzantium: Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

KALDELLIS, A. Romanland: Ethnicity and Empire in Byzantium. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019.

KALDELLIS, A. How was a ‘New Rome’ even thinkable? Premonitions of Constantinople and the portability of Rome. In: KIM, Y. R.; McLAUGHLIN, A. E. T. (ed.). Leadership and Community in Late Antiquity: Essays in Honour of Raymond Van Dam. Turnhout: Brepols, 2020, p. 221-247.

KANTOROWICZ, E. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Theology. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2016.

KODER, J. Rhomaioi. In: Lexikon des Mittelalters. Estugarda/Weimar: J. B. Metzler, 1999, p. 797.

KOLB, F. Praesens Deus: Kaiser und Gott unter der Tetrarchie. In: DEMANDT, A.; GOLTZ, A.; SCHLANGE-SCHÖNINGEN, H. (ed.). Diokletian und die Tetrarchie: Aspekte einer Zeitenwende. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004, p. 27-37.

KORNEMANN, E. Doppelprinzipat und Reichsteilung im Imperium Romanum. Groningen: Bougma’s Boekhuis, 1968.

LEMERLE, P. Cinq études sur le XIe siècle byzantin. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1977.

LILIE, R. Der Kaiser in der Statistik. Subversive Gedanken zur angeblichen Allmacht der byzantinischen Kaiser. In: STAVRAKOS, C.; WASSILIOU, A.-K.; KRIKORIAN, M. K. (ed.). Hypermachos: Studien zu Byzantinistik, Armenologie und Georgistik. Festschrift für Werner Seibt zum 65. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2008, p. 211-233.

MANGO, C.; KAZHDAN, A. Byzantium. In: KAZHDAN, A. (ed.). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 344.

MARÍN RIVEROS, J. A. Notas para una periodificación de la historia bizantina (el problema de la Crisis del siglo VII). Byzantion Nea-Hellás, v. 16, p. 219-233, 1997.

McCORMICK, M. Eternal Victory: Triumphal Rulership in Late Antiquity, Byzantium, and the Early Medieval West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

MILLER, D. J. D.; SARRIS, P. The Novels of Justinian: A Complete Annotated English Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

MOMIGLIANO, A. Os limites da helenização: a interação cultural das civilizações grega, romana, céltica, judaica e persa. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1991.

NEVILLE, L. Sailing Away from Byzantium toward East Roman History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025.

NIXON, C. E. V. (ed.; tr.); RODGERS, B. S. (tr.). In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.

PFEILSCHIFTER, R. Der Kaiser und Konstantinopel: Kommunikation und Konfliktaustrag in einer spätantiken Metropole. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.

RUSSELL, A. Triumvirate, First. In: ERSKINE, A.; HOLLANDER, D. B.; PAPACONSTANTINOU, A. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. Chichester: Wiley, 2015.

RUSSELL, T. Before Constantinople. In: BASSETT, S. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Constantinople. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, p. 17-32.

SALZMAN, M. R. The Falls of Rome: Crises, Resilience, and Resurgence in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.

SANDBERG, K. The so-called division of the Roman Empire in AD 395: notes on a persistent theme in modern historiography. Arctos, v. 42, p. 199-213, 2008.

STOURAITIS, Y. Bürgerkrieg in ideologischer Wahrnehmung durch die Byzantiner (7.–12. Jahrhundert): Die Frage der Legitimierung und Rechtfertigung. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik, v. 60, p. 149-172, 2010.

STOURAITIS, Y. Roman identity in Byzantium: a critical approach. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, v. 107, n. 1, p. 175-220, 2014.

STOURAITIS, Y. Trapped in the imperial narrative? Some reflections on warfare and the provincial masses in Byzantium (600-1204). Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, v. 44, n. 1, p. 1-20, 2020.

VEYNE, P. Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism. London: Penguin, 1992.

VIANNA BOY, R. As relações políticas entre romanos e bárbaros no Mediterrâneo tardo-antigo. Anos 90, v. 26, 2019.

WARD-PERKINS, B. A most unusual Empire: Rome in the Fourth Century. In: RAPP, C.; DRAKE, H. (ed.). The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World: Changing Contexts of Power and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, p. 109-129.

WELCH, K. Triumvirate, Second. In: ERSKINE, A.; HOLLANDER, D. B.; PAPACONSTANTINOU, A. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. Chichester: Wiley, 2016.