O humanismo do último homem
Uma leitura nietzschiana do transumano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/en.v13i2.40182Abstract
Ainda que alguns pensadores transumanistas busquem reivindicar Nietzsche, notadamente afirmando uma filiação entre o transumano (ou o pós-humano) e o sobre-humano, parece, em um exame mais atento, que tudo na filosofia de Nietzsche conspira para torná-lo, se realmente quisermos estabelecer um confronto, um adversário do transumanismo. Mais exatamente, além dos aspectos pontuais de comparação, é na própria axiomática dos valores, ou seja, no que diz respeito aos princípios mais fundamentais no plano axiológico, que Nietzsche se situa como antípoda dos transumanistas. Ao tentar realizar, a partir dos instrumentos metodológicos e conceituais do filósofo alemão, a genealogia e a tipologia do transumanismo, gostaríamos de precisar que o transumanismo é, do ponto de vista nietzschiano, a realização mais deletéria do niilismo. O transumano é apenas a face contemporânea do último homem.
Downloads
References
ADORNO, Francesco P. Le Désir d’une vie illimitée. Paris: Kimé, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/kime.adorn.2012.01
AGAR, Nicholas. Humanity’s End. Why we Should Reject Radical Enhancement. Cambridge & London: MIT Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014625.001.0001
_____. Truly Human Enhancement. A Philosophical Defense of Limits. Cambridge & London: MIT Press, 2014.
ALEXANDRE, Laurent & BESNIER, Jean-Marie. Les Robots font-ils l’amour ? Le transhumanisme en 12 questions. Paris: Dunod, 2016.
BERGSON, Henri. L’Évolution créatrice. Paris: PUF, 2001.
BESNIER, Jean-Michel. Demain les posthumains. Paris: Fayard, 2009.
_____. L’Homme simplifié. Paris: Fayard, 2012.
BOSTROM, Nick. “Transhumanist Values”, Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 4, 2005a, pp. 87-101.
_____. “In Defense of Posthuman Dignity”, Bioethics, 19(3), 2005b, pp. 202-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00437.x
_____. “A history of transhumanist thought”, Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14/1, 2005c.
_____. Superintelligence. Paris: Dunod, 2017.
CONANT, James. “Nietzsche’s perfectionism: a reading of ‘Schopenhauer as educator’”, in: SCHACHT, R. Nietzsche’s Postmoralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 181-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570636.012
COEURNELLE, Didier & ROUX, Marc. Technoprog. Limoges: FYP, 2016.
ELLUL, Jacques. La Technique ou l’enjeu du siècle. Paris: Economica, 1990.
ETTINGER, R. The Prospect of Immortality. Garden City: Doubleday, 1962.
_____. Man into Superman. New York: St. Martins Press, 1972.
FERRY, Luc. La Révolution transhumaniste. Paris: Plon, 2016.
GARCIA, Tristan. La Vie intense. Une obsession moderne. Paris: Autrement, 2016.
GIESEN, K.-G. “Transhumanisme et génétique humaine”, L’Observatoire de la génétique, v. 16, 2004. Disponível em: https://iatranshumanisme.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/no-16.pdf)
GOFFI, Jean-Yves. “Aux origines contemporaines du transhumanisme”, Ethique, politique, religions. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2015.
HABERMAS, Jurgen. L’Avenir de la nature humaine. Vers un eugénisme libéral. Paris: Gallimard, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782070149421
HAN, Byung-Chul. Dans la nuée. Réflexions sur le numérique. Paris: Actes Sud, 2015a.
_____. Le Désir ou l’enfer de l’identique. Paris: Autrement, 2015b.
_____. La Société de transparence. Paris: PUF, 2017.
HIBBARD, Bill. “Nietzsche’s Overhuman is an Ideal Whereas Posthumans Will be Real”, in: TUNCEL, Y. (ed.). Nietzsche and Transhumanism. Precursor or enemy? New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017
HOTTOIS, Gilbert. Philosophie et idéologies trans/posthumanistes. Paris: Vrin, 2017.
_____. Le transhumanisme est-il un humanisme ? Bruxelles: Académie Royale de Belgique, 2014.
HURKA, Thomas. Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
MORE, Max. The Transhumanist reader. West Sussex: Wiley and sons, 2013a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927
_____. “The Philosophy of Transhumanism”, in: MORE, M. & VITA-MORE, N. The Transhumanist Reader. Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 2013b.
_____. “The Overhuman and the Transhuman”, in: TUNCEL, Y. (ed.). Nietzsche and Transhumanism. Precursor or enemy? New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich. Œuvres complètes. Paris: Gallimard, 1966-.
_____. Kritische Studienausgabe [KSA]. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1966-1977.
_____. The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche. Stanford: Stanford University Press 1995-.
OWEN, David. “Equality, democracy, and self-respect: reflections on Nietzsche's agonal perfectionism”, The journal of Nietzsche studies, 24, 2002, pp. 113-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nie.2002.0014
REY, Olivier. Une folle solitude. Paris: Seuil, 2006.
_____. Quand le monde s’est fait nombre. Paris: Stock, 2016.
SALEM, Jean. Tel un Dieu parmi les hommes. L’éthique d’Epicure. Paris: Vrin, 2002.
SIMMEL, George. La Tragédie de la culture. Paris: Payot, 1988.
SORGNER, Stefan Lorenz. “Beyond Humanism: Reflections on Trans- and Posthumanism”, in: TUNCEL, Y. (ed.). Nietzsche and Transhumanism. Precursor or enemy? New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017a.
_____. “Immortality as Utopia and the Relevance of Nihilism”, in: TUNCEL, Y. (ed.). Nietzsche and Transhumanism. Precursor or enemy? New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017b.
SOROSINA, Arnaud. “Nietzsche critique du transhumanisme. Fécondité d’un anachronisme philosophique”, Médecine et philosophie, n. 4, 2020, pp. 8-15.
TIROSH-SAMUELSON, Hava. “Transhumanism as a Secularist Faith”, Zygon, 47/4, 2012, pp. 710-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01288.x
TUNCEL, Yunus. “Introduction”, in: _____. (dir.). Nietzsche and Transhumanism. Precursor or enemy? New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017a.
_____. “Pain and Suffering in Nietzsche and Transhumanism”, in: _____. (dir.). Nietzsche and Transhumanism. Precursor or enemy? New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017b.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Ao submeter o artigo, resenha ou tradução para a Estudos Nietzsche, o autor cede à revista o direito à primeira publicação do texto, mantendo, contudo, o direito de reutilizar o material publicado, por exemplo, em futuras coletâneas de sua obra.