Sobre a apropriação de Heidegger à filosofia prática de Aristóteles, em especial quanto ao conceito de Phrónesis

Roberto S. Kahlmeyer-Mertens

doi:10.47456/sofia.v13i2.46504

Authors

Roberto S. Kahlmeyer-Mertens Professor adjunto do Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná - UNIOESTE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8572-8302

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/sofia.v13i2.46504

Keywords:

Heidegger, practical philosophy, phrónesis, circumvision, phenomenological interpretations of Aristotle

Abstract

The theme of the article is the Heideggerian appropriation of Aristotle's practical philosophy, and how this would imply the concept of “phrónesis”; The question is what role this Aristotelian concept would play in his investigations in the 1920s. The aim is to indicate how this is thought of in two important works from this period, the Natorp Report and Plato’s Sophist. A related goal is to understand how the concept appears within the scope of phenomenological interpretations of the Stagirite, especially in Nicomachean Ethics. The aim is to indicate that phrónesis (treated as circumvision and bringing with it the genesis of the existential care) is what can practically guide us in our behavior, providing a vision of the open and implying interaction with our being. It will be necessary to indicate how phrónesis is linked to a way of uncovering being-there and to highlight how the entity that we are is given to Heidegger's future existential phenomenology.

Author Biography

Roberto S. Kahlmeyer-Mertens, Professor adjunto do Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná - UNIOESTE

Professor adjunto do Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná - UNIOESTE. Doutor em Filosofia formado pela Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – UERJ.

References

ARISTOTLE. On Interpretation; Prior Analytics. In: Aristotle I. (Ed.) Jeffrey Henderson. Cambridge: London, Harvard University Press, 1938, p. 112-181; p. 182-532.

ARISTOTLE. The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. Trad. Sir David Ross. London: Oxford, 1950.

BROGAN, W. Heidegger and Aristotle: The twofoldness of being. New York: State University of New York Press, 2005.

BUREN, J. v. The Young Heidegger: Rumor of Hidden King. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.

COHEN, H. Commentaire de la “Critique de la raison pure”. Trad. Éric Dupour. Paris: Cerf, 2000.

GADAMER, H.-G. Heideggers “theologische” Jugendschrift. In: HEIDEGGER, M. Interprétations phénomenológiques d’Aristóteles. [édition bilingue français-allemand] Trad. J.-F. Courtine. Paris: Trans-Europ-Repress, 1992, p. 9-15.

GADAMER, H.-G. Hermeneutik im Rückblick. In: Gesammelte Werke. Band. 10. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr Siebeck, 1994.

HEIDEGGER, M. Grundprobleme Der Phänomenologie (1919-20). In: Gesamtausgabe – II Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1919-1944. Band 58. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1993.

HEIDEGGER, M. Interprétations phénomenológiques d’Aristóteles. [Édition bilingue français-allemand] Trad. J.-F. Courtine. Paris: Trans-Europ-Repress, 1992a.

HEIDEGGER, M. Meu caminho para a fenomenologia. In: Sobre a questão do pensamento. Trad. Ernildo Stein. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2009. p.85-93.

HEIDEGGER, M. Ontologie: Hermeneutik der Faktizität. In: Gesamtausgabe II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen. Band 63. Frankfurt am Main, Klostermann, 1988.

HEIDEGGER, M. Phänomenologie des Religiönsen Lebens. In: Gesamtausgabe. II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen. Band. 60. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1995.

HEIDEGGER, M. Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles: Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. In: Gesamtausgabe 61. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1994.

HEIDEGGER, M. Platon: Sophistes. In: Gesamtausgabe – II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen. Band 19. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1992b.

KAHLMEYER-MERTENS, R. S. Cuidado, educação e singularidade: Ideias para uma filosofia da educação em bases heideggerianas. In Princípios: Revista de Filosofia, 2008, n.15, v. 24, p. 209-223.

KAHLMEYER-MERTENS, R. S. Da interpretação heideggeriana da Ética a Nicômaco: Filosofia prática como ontologia da vida cotidiana. In: Revista Ética e Filosofia Política (2003), n. 16. v.2. p. 65-75.

KAHLMEYER-MERTENS, R. S. Indicação de “nosso ser-aí mais próprio”, tarefa de Ontologia: Hermenêutica da Facticidade. In: Perspectiva Filosófica (2023), v. 50, n. 2, p. 90-105.

KAHLMEYER-MERTENS, R. S. Heidegger e a filosofia prática de Aristóteles. In: Ekstasis (2012), v.1, n.1, p. 5-17.

KIESEL, T. The genesis of Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time’. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

LIDDELL, SCOTT, Greek-English Lexicon. London, New York, Toronto: Oxford at the Claredon Press, 1984.

LONG, C. P. The ontological reappropriation of phronesis. Continental Philosophy Review, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 35 (2002), p. 35-60.

OLAFSON, F. A. Heidegger and the ground of ethics: A study of Mitsein. United Kingdom: Cambridge, 1998.

PERAITA, Carmen. Hermenéutica de la vida humana. En torno al Informe Natorp de Martin Heidegger. Trotta Editorial, 2002.

ROHDE, E. Psique: La idea del alma y la inmortalidad entre los griegos. Trad. Salvador F. Ramírez. Barcelona: Labor, 1973.

SADLER, T. Heidegger and Aristotle: The question of being. London: Athlone, 1996.

SHEEHAN, T. Heidegger, Aristotle and Phenomenology. In: Philosophy Today, vol. XIX, nos. 2-4. Chicago: Loyola University of Chicago. 1975, p. 87-94.

WEBER, M. Wissenchaft als Beruf (1917-19). In: Studienausgabe. Band. I/17. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr Siebeck, 1994.

WOLFF, C. Philosophia rationalis sive logica, methodo scientifica pertractata et ad usum scietiarum atque vitæ aptata. Præmittitur discursus præliminaris de philosophia in genere. London: Forgotten Books, 2019.