The Taylor-Kuhn debate on the distinction between natural and social sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/sofia.v14i1.46480Keywords:
Charles Taylor, Thomas S. Kuhn, epistemic values, hermeneutics, normal scienceAbstract
This paper aims to clarify the points considered relevant in the contemporary debate on the distinction between natural and human sciences carried out by Charles Taylor and Thomas S. Kuhn. Initially, we seek to elucidate relationships between Philosophical Anthropology and the effort to define the so-called Sciences of Nature and Sciences of the Spirit developed in the work of Wilhelm Dilthey – basis for Taylor in his paper Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. Thus, Kuhn will discuss Taylor's chapter in The natural sciences and the human sciences, which involves criticism of the nature and objective of the sciences including the participation of the subject, the scientific community and the hermeneutics established within the paradigm of such an area in the constitution of its interpretation. Philosophical and genealogical clarifications of their work are made, as well as analysis of convergent and divergent points in the distinction between types of science. In the end, critical comments by Hugh Lacey on the topics covered in the debate are implemented together with interpretations of Kuhn's late writings, expanding the discussion based on his own philosophy and the epistemic values present in the current scientific endeavor.
References
BIRD, Alexander. Human Kinds, Interactive Kinds and Realism about Kinds, 2014. Disponível em http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~plajb/research/papers/Human_Kinds_Interactive_Kinds_and_Realism.pdf
CASSIRER, Ernst. Ensaio sobre o Homem: Introdução a uma filosofia da cultura humana: São Paulo, Martins Fontes, 2005.
DILTHEY, Wilhelm. Introducción a las ciencias del espíritu: Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1986.
FREGE, Gottlob. Lógica e Filosofia da Linguagem: São Paulo, EDUSP, 2009.
HACKING, Ian. Working in a New World: The taxonomic solution. Em: HORWICH, Paul. World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of the Science. MIT Press, 1993.
_____. Ontologia Histórica: Rio Grande do Sul, Editora Unisinos, 2009a.
_____. Kinds of People: Moving Targets. Proceedings of British Academy, 151: pp. 285-318, 2009b.
_____. Representar e Intervir: tópicos introdutórios de filosofia da ciência natural. Tradução de Pedro Rocha de Oliveira; Rio de Janeiro: Editora UERJ, 2013.
KHALIDI, Muhammad Ali. Interactive kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2): pp. 335-360, 2010.
KUHN, Thomas S. As ciências naturais e as ciências humanas. In: CONANT, James; HAUGELAND, John (eds.). O caminho desde a Estrutura. Tradução de César Mortari: São Paulo, Editora Unesp, 2003a.
_____. Pós - escritos. In: CONANT, James; HAUGELAND, John (eds.). O caminho desde a Estrutura. Tradução de César Mortari: São Paulo, Editora Unesp, 2003b.
_____. A estrutura das Revoluções Científicas. São Paulo, Editora Perspectiva. 12ª edição, 2013.
_____. Objetividade, juízo de valor e escolha de teoria. Em: KUHN, Thomas S. A tensão essencial: estudos selecionados sobre tradição e mudança científica: São Paulo, Editora Unesp, 2009.
_____. A incomensurabilidade da ciência: os últimos escritos de Thomas S. Kuhn. Organizado por Bojana Mladenović: Traduzido por Alexandre Alves. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2024.
LACEY, Hugh. Interpretação e teoria nas ciências naturais e nas ciências humanas: comentários sobre Kuhn e Taylor. Trans/Form/Ação (São Paulo), v.20, p.77-93, 1997.
LIMA VAZ, Henrique Cláudio de. Antropologia Filosófica I: São Paulo, Loyola, 1991.
MASTERMAN, Margaret. A natureza de um paradigma. In: LAKATOS, Imre; MUSGRAVE, Alan (eds.) A crítica e o desenvolvimento do conhecimento: São Paulo, Editora Cultrix, 1979.
RICOEUR. Paul. A Metáfora Viva. São Paulo: Loyola, 2000.
TAYLOR, Charles. Interpretation in the Sciences of Man. Em: Taylor, Charles. Philosophy and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985a.
_____. Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985b.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bismarck Bório de Medeiros
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the journal's open access policy, the use of published texts is free of charge, with the obligation to acknowledge the original authorship and first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their content.
I. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
II. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original and assume full responsibility for its content in the event of third-party claims.
III. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation by another journal.
IV. The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
V. The authors are authorized and encouraged to disseminate and distribute their work online after publication in the journal.
VI. The authors of approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries, and similar platforms.
VII. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and adapt the article to the journal's editorial standards.
