The epistemic validity of religious propositions
An analysis based on Suhrawardi’s logic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/sofia.v15i1.52168Keywords:
Suhrawardi’s logic, epistemic validity, religious propositions, self-evidence, illusion of knowing, existence and essenceAbstract
This article examines the logical admissibility of religious propositions through the framework of Suhrawardi’s logic. It does not seek to confirm or refute religious claims, but to assess whether such propositions satisfy the minimal conditions required for epistemic evaluation. Four criteria derived from Suhrawardi’s logic structure the analysis: definability of the subject, self-evidence as the starting point of cognition, the capacity to generate genuine knowledge, and the preservation of the distinction between existence and essence. The study suggests that many widely employed religious propositions encounter significant difficulties in meeting these logical requirements. They often lack clearly determinate conceptual content, may not provide a legitimate epistemic starting point, and do not readily culminate in analyzable knowledge. Moreover, by loosening or suspending the relation between essence and existence, they tend to resist rational assessment. Consequently, within this strictly logical framework, such propositions can be understood as tending to remain outside, or at best at the margins of, epistemic validity.
References
ADAMSON, Peter. Philosophy in the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577491.001.0001.
ALSTON, William P. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
CORBIN, Henry. En Islam iranien: aspects spirituels et philosophiques. v. 2. Paris: Gallimard, 1971.
FLEW, Antony. Theology and falsification. University: A Quarterly Review of Education, v. 1, n. 2, p. 96–99, 1950.
HA’IRI YAZDI, Mehdi. The Principles of Epistemology in Islamic Philosophy: Knowledge by Presence. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.
HARE, R. M. Theology and falsification: a symposium. In: FLEW, Antony; MACINTYRE, Alasdair (org.). New essays in philosophical theology. London: SCM Press, 1955.
KAUKUA, Jari. Self-Awareness in Islamic Philosophy: Avicenna and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316135570.
PLANTINGA, Alvin. Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
STROBINO, Riccardo. Avicenna’s Theory of Science: Logic, Metaphysics, Epistemology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.89.
SUHRAWARDI, Shihab al-Din. Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq. Ed. Henry Corbin. Tehran: Institute of Iranian Philosophy, 1952.
SUHRAWARDI, Shihab al-Din. Talwīḥāt. Ed. Hossein Ziai. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, 1990.
WALBRIDGE, John. The Leaven of the Ancients: Suhrawardi and the Heritage of the Greeks. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.
WISNOVSKY, Robert. Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
ZIAI, Hossein. Knowledge and Illumination: A Study of Suhrawardi’s Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saeed Javdaniyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the journal's open access policy, the use of published texts is free of charge, with the obligation to acknowledge the original authorship and first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their content.
I. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
II. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original and assume full responsibility for its content in the event of third-party claims.
III. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation by another journal.
IV. The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
V. The authors are authorized and encouraged to disseminate and distribute their work online after publication in the journal.
VI. The authors of approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries, and similar platforms.
VII. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and adapt the article to the journal's editorial standards.
