A family dispute: Rawls versus Habermas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/sofia.v14i1.47344Keywords:
original position, basic fundamental liberties, Rawls, HabermasAbstract
Rawls affirms the first principle of justice as fairness, stressing that all people should have an equal right to the greatest possible system of equal basic liberties, so that the system of liberties of one person is compatible with those of others. This principle would be chosen within the original position, a situation of impartiality where the parties would not have access to their social, economic and even psychological characteristics. With regard to his P1, Rawls affirms a list of equal basic liberties that would need to be guaranteed in a well-ordered society. And he points out that liberties can be limited when they conflict with other liberties, so they are not seen as absolute. However, the American philosopher affirms that political liberties have a special nature, making the first principle of justice as fairness a principle of equal political participation. Habermas, in turn, criticizes Rawls by stating that political liberties, in Rawls' thought, play merely an instrumental role, as well as the fact that the design of the original position would fail to explain and secure the point of impartial evaluation of deontologically understood principles of justice. In this paper, the central objective will be to investigate whether the criticisms presented by Habermas follow, on which it will be argued that the German philosopher's objections to Rawls, despite having presented important challenges to Rawlsian political liberalism, do not follow.
References
BAYNES, K. Critical Theory and Habermas. In: MANDLE, J.; REIDY, D. A. (eds.). A Companion to Rawls. Malden: Wiley Blackwell, 2014, pp. 487-503.
FORST, R. Right to justification. Elements of a constructivist theory of justice. Translated by Jeffrey Flynn. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
GUTMANN, Amy. Rawls on the Relationship between Liberalism and Democracy. In: FREEMAN, S. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 168 - 199.
HABERMAS, J. A inclusão do outro. Estudos de teoria política. Tradução de Denílson Luís Werle. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2018.
HABERMAS, J. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory
of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1996.
MAFFETTONE, S. Political Liberalism: Reasonableness and democratic practice. In: Philosophy & Social Criticism. 2004; 30(5-6), pp. 541-577. doi:10.1177/0191453704045754.
MAFFETTONE, S. Rawls: 40 years later (1971–2011). In: Philosophy & Social Criticism, 38(9), pp. 901-915, 2012. doi:10.1177/0191453712465731.
MAFFETTONE, S. Rawls: an introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.
RAWLS, J. A Theory of Justice. Original edition. Cambridge and London: Belknap press of Harvard University Press, 1971.
RAWLS, J. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Cambridge: Belknap press of Harvard University Press, 1999a [1971].
RAWLS, J. Justice as Fairness. A Restatement. Erin Kelly (ed.). Cambridge and London: Belknap press of Harvard University Press, 2001.
RAWLS, J. Justice as Reciprocity. In: RAWLS, J. Collected Papers. Samuel Freeman (org.). Cambridge and London: Havard University Press, 1999b [1971].
RAWLS, J. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996 [1993].
TOMÉ, J. Rawls e a Desobediência Civil. 2018. 160f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) – Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis-SC, 2018
VOLPATO DUTRA, D. J. A posição original como mediação entre Estado de Natureza e imperativo categórico: Rawls entre Hobbes e Kant. In: ethic@, Florianópolis, v. 13, n. 1, p. 112-140, jun. 2014.
WERLE, D. L. Liberdades básicas, justificação pública e poder político em John Rawls. Dissertatio (UFPel), v. 34, p. 183-207, 2011.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Julio Tomé
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the journal's open access policy, the use of published texts is free of charge, with the obligation to acknowledge the original authorship and first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their content.
I. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
II. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original and assume full responsibility for its content in the event of third-party claims.
III. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation by another journal.
IV. The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
V. The authors are authorized and encouraged to disseminate and distribute their work online after publication in the journal.
VI. The authors of approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries, and similar platforms.
VII. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and adapt the article to the journal's editorial standards.
