Liberal political perfectionism as a morally permissible, politically possible, and probably effective non-ideal theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/sofia.v14i2.50785Keywords:
liberal political perfectionism, ideal theory, non-ideal theory, political realism, practical feasibilityAbstract
This article analyzes the position of the liberal political perfectionist proposal, understood as the state promotion of liberal political virtues, in relation to its practical necessity and feasibility. Initially, the authors present their proposal for liberal political perfectionism, emphasizing its fundamental practical importance for the maintenance and flourishing of liberal democracies. Then, in light of the current debate between ideal theories, non-ideal theories, and political realism, this article shows how such perfectionism, although based on markedly realist descriptions, should be considered a non-ideal theory due to its prior commitment to the normativity of egalitarian political liberalism, yet remaining capable of guiding political action. Finally, it argues that this commitment to the normativity of egalitarian political liberalism and the consequent departure from political realism do not lessen its effective applicability in liberal democratic societies.
References
ARAUJO, Ricardo Corrêa et al. A compatibilidade entre o perfeccionismo moderado de Joseph Chan e a justiça como equidade de John Rawls a partir da leitura de Steven Wall do princípio aristotélico. ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-25, 2024.
ARAUJO, Ricardo Corrêa et al. John Rawls e Hannah Arendt: Da rejeição a um humanismo cívico abrangente à possível convergência em torno de um perfeccionismo minimalista, baseado nas virtudes políticas. Veritas, v. 68, n. 1, p. 1-16, 24 nov. 2023.
ARAUJO, Ricardo Corrêa et al. Uma crítica às formulações do perfeccionismo político de Joseph Chan e Jonathan Quong: do equívoco do perfeccionismo moderado à inconsistência da possibilidade formal. Revista Dissertatio de Filosofia, v. 55, p. 111-131, 2022.
ARAUJO, Ricardo Corrêa; MAURÍCIO JUNIOR, Alceu. O perfeccionismo político como possível concretização do fato da maioria: Uma alternativa em direção às sociedades bem-ordenadas. Novos estudos CEBRAP, v. 41, p. 527-543, 2022.
CHAN, Joseph. Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism. Philosophy & Public Affairs, v. 29, n. 1, p. 5-42, 2000.
COITINHO, Denis. Contrato & virtudes III – Problemas epistemológico-morais e metodológicos. 1a edição ed. São Paulo, SP: Edições Loyola, 2024.
COZZAGLIO Ilaria; FAVARA, Greta. Non-Ideal theory and Political Realism. In: HÄNEL, Hilkje C.; MÜLLER, Johanna M. (Orgs.). The Routledge handbook of non-ideal theory. New York: Routledge, 2024. p. 153-162.
DAGGER, Richard. Citizenship as Fairness: John Rawls’s Conception of Civic Virtue. In: MANDLE, Jon; REIDY, David A. (Orgs.). A Companion to Rawls. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2014. p. 368-393.
FREEMAN, Samuel. Ideal theory, political liberalism, and the well-ordered society. Journal of Social Philosophy, v. 55, n. 2, p. 278-298, 2023.
GALSTON, William A. Liberal Virtues. The American Political Science Review, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1277-1290, 1988.
GOODHART, Michael. Realistic Prescription. In: HÄNEL, Hilkje C.; MÜLLER, Johanna M. (Orgs.). The Routledge handbook of non-ideal theory. New York: Routledge, 2024. p. 67-79.
HAKSAR, Vinit. Equality, Liberty and Perfectionism. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.
HÄNEL, Hilkje C.; MÜLLER, Johanna M. (Orgs.). The Routledge handbook of non-ideal theory. New York: Routledge, 2024.
INSTITUTO V-DEM. Relatório da Democracia 2025: 25 Anos de Autocratização – Foi a Democracia Derrotada? Gotemburgo, Suécia: V-Dem, 2025. Disponível em https://v-dem.net/documents/63/V-DemDemocracyReport_portuguese_2025_lowres.pdf. Acesso em 16 out. 2025.
KYMLICKA, Will. Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality. Ethics, v. 99, n. 4, p. 883-905, 1989.
LESSA, Jaderson Borges. Virtudes políticas e neutralidade ética em John Rawls. In: ORBEN, Douglas João et al. (Orgs.). A Invenção da Modernidade: As Relações entre Ética, Política, Direito e Moral. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2017. p. 85-101.
MACEDO, Stephen. Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford ; New York: Clarendon Press, 1990.
MANG, Franz. Liberal Neutrality and Moderate Perfectionism. Res Publica, v. 19, n. 4, p. 297-315, 2013.
MAURICIO JUNIOR, Alceu. Liberalismo político perfeccionista: Uma proposta de promoção estatal das virtudes políticas a partir do paradigma liberal igualitário de John Rawls. Tese de Doutorado-Vitoria: Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo, 2025.
PRINZ, J.; ROSSI, E. ‘Political Realism as Ideology Critique’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, v. 20, n. 3, p. 348-365, 2017.
QUONG, Jonathan. Liberalism Without Perfection. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
RAWLS, John. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical”. Philosophy & Public Affairs, v. 14, n. 3, p. 223-251, 1985.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge-MA.: Harvard University Press, 1999a.
RAWLS, John. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge-MA.: Harvard University Press, 1999b.
RAWLS, John. Uma teoria da justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.
RAWLS, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
RAWLS, John. A justiça como equidade: Uma reformulação. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. Expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
RAWLS, John. O Liberalismo político. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2011.
RAWLS, John. O direito dos povos. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2019.
RAZ, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
ROSSI, Enzo. Fact-Centric Political Theory, Three Ways: Normative Behaviourism, Grounded Normative Theory, and Radical Realism. Political Studies Review, v. 21, n. 3, p. 481-489, 2023.
SCHWARZENBACH, Sibyl A. On Civic Friendship. Ethics, v. 107, n. 1, p. 97-128, 1996.
SHER, George. Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
TAHZIB, Collis. Perfectionism: Political not Metaphysical. Philosophy & Public Affairs, v. 47, n. 2, p. 144-178, 2019.
VALENTINI, Laura. On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory. The Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 17, n. 3, p. 332-355, 2009.
WALL, Steven. Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
WALL, Steven. Perfectionist Justice and Rawlsian Legitimacy. In: MANDLE, Jon; REIDY, David A. (Orgs.). A Companion to Rawls. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2014. p. 413-429.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ricardo Araújo, Alceu Maurício Junior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the journal's open access policy, the use of published texts is free of charge, with the obligation to acknowledge the original authorship and first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their content.
I. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
II. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original and assume full responsibility for its content in the event of third-party claims.
III. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation by another journal.
IV. The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
V. The authors are authorized and encouraged to disseminate and distribute their work online after publication in the journal.
VI. The authors of approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries, and similar platforms.
VII. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and adapt the article to the journal's editorial standards.
