Metodologias para avaliação do custo marginal de redução de emissões de gases de efeito estufa na descarbonização: uma revisão sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v11i3.48732Palavras-chave:
Curvas de Custo Marginal de Abatimento, Mitigação de Gases de Efeito Estufa, Revisão de Metodologias, Economia AmbientalResumo
Trata-se de uma revisão das metodologias que utilizam o custo marginal de abatimento (MAC) de emissões de gases de efeito estufa, o objetivo é identificar os tipos de abordagens disponíveis, suas vantagens, desvantagens, em que casos são utilizadas e qual a sua complexidade (tanto computacional como obtenção de dados). Os resultados da pesquisa foram encontrados e explicados seis tipos principais de modelos: abordagens baseadas em especialistas, modelos de engenharia, funções de distância, modelos de equilíbrio geral computável, modelos de avaliação integrada e modelos híbridos em que todos utilizam curvas MAC para identificar medidas econômicas a mitigação da mudança climática e estabelecer caminhos de descarbonização. Além disso, é discutida a possibilidade de utilizar modelos híbridos que integrem diversas metodologias para uma avaliação mais completa, assim como as dificuldades de sua aplicação. A principal contribuição é não apenas trazer uma revisão sobre as metodologias, mas também comparar as e mostrar quais contextos cada uma é melhor aplicada buscando servir como um guia para futuras pesquisas e aplicações práticas na área de economia ambiental.
Downloads
Referências
Aldy, J., Pizer, W., Tavoni, M., Reis, L. A., Akimoto, K., Blanford, G., ... & Sano, F. (2016). Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change, 6(11), 1000-1004. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3106
An, R., Yu, B., Li, R., & Wei, Y. M. (2018). Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China’s iron and steel industry. Applied energy, 226, 862-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.044
Babacan, O., De Causmaecker, S., Gambhir, A., Fajardy, M., Rutherford, A.W., Fantuzzi, A. and Nelson, J., 2020. Assessing the feasibility of carbon dioxide mitigation options in terms of energy usage. Nature Energy, 5(9), 720-728. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0646-1
Bai, C., Feng, C., Yan, H., Yi, X., Chen, Z., & Wei, W. (2020). Will income inequality influence the abatement effect of renewable energy technological innovation on carbon dioxide emissions? Journal of Environmental Management, 264, 110482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110482
Bauer, N., Bertram, C., Schultes, A., Klein, D., Luderer, G., Kriegler, E., Popp, A. and Edenhofer, O., 2020. Quantification of an efficiency–sovereignty trade-off in climate policy. Nature, 588(7837), 261-266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2982-5
Beach, R. H., Creason, J., Ohrel, S. B., Ragnauth, S., Ogle, S., Li, C., ... & Salas, W. (2015). Global mitigation potential and costs of reducing agricultural non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions through 2030. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 12(sup1), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2015.1110183
Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I., & Strømman, A. H. (2017). State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping – A review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 408-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
Busch, J., Engelmann, J., Cook-Patton, S. C., Griscom, B. W., Kroeger, T., Possingham, H., & Shyamsundar, P. (2019). Potential for low-cost carbon dioxide removal through tropical reforestation. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 463-466. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0485-x
Chen, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Lv, J., Wen, J., Chen, X., ... & McElroy, M. B. (2021). Pathway toward carbon-neutral electrical systems in China by mid-century with negative CO2 abatement costs informed by high-resolution modeling. Joule, 5(10), 2715-2741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.10.006
Choi, Y., Zhang, N., & Zhou, P. (2012). Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure. Applied Energy, 98, 198-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.024
Clarivate (2017). Web of Science: A closer look at cited and citing half-lives. Recuperado de https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/article/a-closer-look-at-cited-and-citing-half-lives/
Cole, W. J., Greer, D., Denholm, P., Frazier, A. W., Machen, S., Mai, T., & Baldwin, S. F. (2021). Quantifying the challenge of reaching a 100% renewable energy power system for the United States. Joule, 5(7), 1732-1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.011
Cui, L. B., Fan, Y., Zhu, L., & Bi, Q. H. (2014). How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? Applied Energy, 136, 1043-1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.021
Daelman, M. R., van Voorthuizen, E. M., van Dongen, U. G., Volcke, E. I., & van Loosdrecht, M. C. (2012). Methane emission during municipal wastewater treatment. Water research, 46(11), 3657-3670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.024
Daly, H. E., Scott, K., Strachan, N., & Barrett, J. (2015). Indirect CO2 emission implications of energy system pathways: linking IO and TIMES models for the UK. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(17), 10701-10709. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01020
Deng, H. M., Liang, Q. M., Liu, L. J., & Anadon, L. D. (2018). Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography. Environmental Research Letters, 12(12), 123001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa98d2
Dietz, S., Bowen, A., Dixon, C., & Gradwell, P. (2016). ‘Climate value at risk’of global financial assets. Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 676-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2972
Drouet, L., Bosetti, V., & Tavoni, M. (2015). Selection of climate policies under the uncertainties in the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Nature climate change, 5(10), 937-940.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2721
Drouet, L., Bosetti, V., Padoan, S. A., Aleluia Reis, L., Bertram, C., Dalla Longa, F., ... & Tavoni, M. (2021). Net zero-emission pathways reduce the physical and economic risks of climate change. Nature Climate Change, 11(12), 1070-1076. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01218-z
Du, L., Hanley, A. & Wei, C. (2015). Marginal Abatement Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China: A Parametric Analysis. Environ Resource Econ, 61, 191-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9789-5
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka Jr, C. A. (2007). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32(7), 1055-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.005
Frondel, M., Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2007). End‐of‐pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries. Business strategy and the environment, 16(8), 571-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.496
Fujimori, S., Hasegawa, T., Masui, T., Takahashi, K., Herran, D.S., Dai, H., Hijioka, Y. and Kainuma, M., 2017. SSP3: AIM implementation of shared socioeconomic pathways. Global Environmental Change, 42, 268-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009
Gambhir, A., George, M., McJeon, H., Arnell, N. W., Bernie, D., Mittal, S., ... & Monteith, S. (2022). Near-term transition and longer-term physical climate risks of greenhouse gas emissions pathways. Nature Climate Change, 12(1), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01236-x
Glanemann, N., Willner, S. N., & Levermann, A. (2020). Paris Climate Agreement passes the cost-benefit test. Nature communications, 11(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13961-1
Gu, B., Zhang, X., Lam, S. K., Yu, Y., van Grinsven, H. J., Zhang, S., ... & Chen, D. (2023). Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands. Nature, 613(7942), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05481-8
Gu B, Zhang L, Van Dingenen R, Vieno M, Van Grinsven HJ, Zhang X, Zhang S, Chen Y, Wang S, Ren C, Rao S. (2021). Abating ammonia is more cost-effective than nitrogen oxides for mitigating PM2. 5 air pollution. Science. 374(6568), 758-62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf8623
Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Ali, S., Shahzad, U., & Cui, L. (2021). Exploring the role of green innovation and investment in energy for environmental quality: An empirical appraisal from provincial data of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112779
Havlík, P., Valin, H., Herrero, M., Obersteiner, M., Schmid, E., Rufino, M. C., ... & Notenbaert, A. (2014). Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(10), 3709-3714. https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1308044111
Heitmann, N. & Peterson, S. (2014). The potential contribution of the shipping sector to an efficient reduction of global carbon dioxide emissions. Environ. Sci. Policy, 42, 56e66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.001
Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Notenbaert, A., Rufino, M.C., Thornton, P.K., Blümmel, M., Weiss, F., Grace, D., & Obersteiner, M. (2013). Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 110(52), 20888-20893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308149 110
Huang, S. K., Kuo, L., & Chou, K. L. (2016). The applicability of marginal abatement cost approach: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.013
IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 35-115, https://doi.org/10.59327/ipcc/ar6-9789291691647
Iyer, G. C., Clarke, L. E., Edmonds, J. A., Flannery, B. P., Hultman, N. E., McJeon, H. C., & Victor, D. G. (2015). Improved representation of investment decisions in assessments of CO2 mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 5(5), 436-440. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate2553
Kajaste, R. & Hurme, M. (2016). Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions–management options and abatement cost. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 4041-4052. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.055
Kesicki, F. & Anandarajah, G. (2011). The role of energy-service demand reduction in global climate change mitigation: Combining energy modelling and decomposition analysis. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7224-7233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.043
Kesicki, F. (2013). Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: Combining Energy System Modelling and Decomposition Analysis. Environ Model Assess, 18, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-012-9330-6
Khaqqi, K. N., Sikorski, J. J., Hadinoto, K., & Kraft, M. (2018). Incorporating seller/buyer reputation-based system in blockchain-enabled emission trading application. Applied energy, 209, 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.070
Kiuila, O. & Rutherford, T. F. (2013a). The cost of reducing CO2 emissions: integrating abatement technologies into economic modeling. Ecol. Econ. 87, 62e71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.070
Kiuila, O., Rutherford, T.F. (2013b). Piecewise smooth approximation of bottom-up abatement cost curves. Energy Econ. 40, 734-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.07.016
Lameh, M., Al-Mohannadi, D. M., & Linke, P. (2022). Minimum marginal abatement cost curves (Mini-MAC) for CO2 emissions reduction planning. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24(1), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02095-y
Lu, N., Tian, H., Fu, B., Yu, H., Piao, S., Chen, S., ... & Smith, P. (2022). Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions. Nature Climate Change, 12(9), 847-853. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01432-3
Markandya, A., Sampedro, J., Smith, S.J., Van Dingenen, R., Pizarro-Irizar, C., Arto, I. and González-Eguino, M. (2018). Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 2(3), e126-e133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30029-9
McKitrick, R. (1999). A derivation of the marginal abatement cost curve. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 37, 306e314. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1065
Mekaroonreung, M. & Johnson, A. L. (2014). A nonparametric method to estimate a technical change effect on marginal abatement costs of US coal power plants. Energy economics, 46, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.08.027
Pacca, S. A. (2018). Estudo de baixo carbono para a indústria do estado de São Paulo de 2014 a 2030: relatório síntese. Recuperado de https://repositorio.cetesb.sp.gov.br/handle/123456789/2375
Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., Resende, L. M. (2015). Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x
Pagani, R. N., Pedroso, B., dos Santos, C. B., Picinin, C. T., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2023). Methodi Ordinatio 2.0: revisited under statistical estimation and presenting FInder and RankIn. Quality & Quantity, 57(5), 4563-4602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01562-y
Paroussos, L., Mandel, A., Fragkiadakis, K., Fragkos, P., Hinkel, J., & Vrontisi, Z. (2019). Climate clubs and the macro-economic benefits of international cooperation on climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 9(7), 542-546. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0501-1
Pietzcker, R. C., Osorio, S., & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Tightening EU ETS targets in line with the European Green Deal: Impacts on the decarbonization of the EU power sector. Applied Energy, 293, 116914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116914
Realmonte, G., Drouet, L., Gambhir, A., Glynn, J., Hawkes, A., Köberle, A. C., & Tavoni, M. (2019). An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nature communications, 10(1), 3277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10842-5
Reis, L. A., Drouet, L., & Tavoni, M. (2022). Internalising health-economic impacts of air pollution into climate policy: a global modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(1), e40-e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00259-X
Riahi, K., Kriegler, E., Johnson, N., Bertram, C., Den Elzen, M., Eom, J., ... & Edenhofer, O. (2015). Locked into Copenhagen pledges - implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 8-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016
Rogelj, J., McCollum, D.L., Reisinger, A., Meinshausen, M. and Riahi, K., 2013. Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. Nature, 493(7430), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11787
Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E., & Herzog, H. J. (2015). The cost of CO2 capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 378-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018
Rødseth, K. L. (2013). Capturing the least costly way of reducing pollution: a shadow price approach. Ecological Economics, 92, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.006
Sands, R. D. & Schumacher, K. (2009). Economic comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options in Germany. Energy Efficiency, 2, 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9031-9
Sapkota, T. B., Vetter, S. H., Jat, M. L., Sirohi, S., Shirsath, P. B., Singh, R., ... & Stirling, C. M. (2019). Cost-effective opportunities for climate change mitigation in Indian agriculture. Science of the Total Environment, 655, 1342-1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.225
Schmidt, T. S., Born, R., & Schneider, M. (2012). Assessing the costs of photovoltaic and wind power in six developing countries. Nature Climate Change, 2(7), 548-553. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1490
Selvakkumaran, S., Limmeechokchai, B., Masui, T., Hanaoka, T., & Matsuoka, Y. (2014). Low carbon society scenario 2050 in Thai industrial sector. Energy Conversion and Management, 85, 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.03.040
Shapiro, J. S. & Walker, R. (2018). Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining? The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. American Economic Review, 108(12), 3814-3854. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/pdf/doi/10.1257/aer.20151272
Shindell, D., Kuylenstierna, J.C., Vignati, E., van Dingenen, R., Amann, M., Klimont, Z., Anenberg, S.C., Muller, N., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Raes, F. and Schwartz, J., 2012. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science, 335(6065), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026
Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., Van Vuuren, D. P., Den Elzen, M. G., Eickhout, B., & Kabat, P. (2009). Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic change, 95(1-2), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6
Sternberg, A. & Bardow, A. (2015). Power-to-What? Environmental assessment of energy storage systems. Energy & Environmental Science, 8(2), 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE03051F
Tao, R., Umar, M., Naseer, A., & Razi, U. (2021). The dynamic effect of eco-innovation and environmental taxes on carbon neutrality target in emerging seven (E7) economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113525
Taylor S. (2012). The ranking of negative-cost emissions reduction measures. Energy Policy. 48, 430-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.071
Tomaschek, J. (2015). Marginal abatement cost curves for policy recommendation–A method for energy system analysis. Energy Policy, 85, 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.021
Ueckerdt, F., Bauer, C., Dirnaichner, A., Everall, J., Sacchi, R., & Luderer, G. (2021). Potential and risks of hydrogen-based e-fuels in climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 384-393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01032-7
Van Vuuren, D. P., Den Elzen, M. G., Lucas, P. L., Eickhout, B., Strengers, B. J., Van Ruijven, B., ... & Van Houdt, R. (2007). Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs. Climatic change, 81, 119-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9
Van Vuuren, D. P., van der Wijst, K. I., Marsman, S., van den Berg, M., Hof, A. F., & Jones, C. D. (2020). The costs of achieving climate targets and the sources of uncertainty. Nature Climate Change, 10(4), 329-334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0732-1
Wagner, F., Amann, M., Borken-Kleefeld, J., Cofala, J., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Purohit, P., ... & Winiwarter, W. (2012). Sectoral marginal abatement cost curves: implications for mitigation pledges and air pollution co-benefits for Annex I countries. Sustainability Science, 7, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0167-3
Wang, J., Lv, K., Bian, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2017). Energy efficiency and marginal carbon dioxide emission abatement cost in urban China. Energy Policy, 105, 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.039
Wang, K. & Wei, Y. M. (2014). China’s regional industrial energy efficiency and carbon emissions abatement costs. Applied Energy, 130, 617-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.010
Wang, K., Wang, C., & Chen, J. (2009). Analysis of the economic impact of different Chinese climate policy options based on a CGE model incorporating endogenous technological change. Energy policy, 37(8), 2930-2940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.023
Wang, T., Jiang, Z., Zhao, B., Gu, Y., Liou, K. N., Kalandiyur, N., ... & Zhu, Y. (2020). Health co-benefits of achieving sustainable net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in California. Nature Sustainability, 3(8), 597-605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0520-y
Wang, Z. & Zhu, Y. (2020). Do energy technology innovations contribute to CO2 emissions abatement? A spatial perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 726, 138574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138574
West, J. J., Smith, S. J., Silva, R. A., Naik, V., Zhang, Y., Adelman, Z., ... & Lamarque, J. F. (2013). Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nature climate change, 3(10), 885-889. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2009
Xie, R., Fang, J., & Liu, C. (2017). The effects of transportation infrastructure on urban carbon emissions. Applied Energy, 196, 199-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.020
Yang, X., Nielsen, C. P., Song, S., & McElroy, M. B. (2022). Breaking the hard-to-abate bottleneck in China’s path to carbon neutrality with clean hydrogen. Nature Energy, 7(10), 955-965. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01114-6
Yuan J. & Ng, S. H. (2017). Emission reduction measures ranking under uncertainty. Applied Energy, 15(188),270-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.109
Zhang, S., Ma, M., Li, K., Ma, Z., Feng, W., & Cai, W. (2022). Historical carbon abatement in the commercial building operation: China versus the US. Energy Economics, 105, 105712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105712
Zhang, Shihui., An, K., Li, J., Weng, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, S., ... & Gong, P. (2021). Incorporating health co-benefits into technology pathways to achieve China's 2060 carbon neutrality goal: a modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(11), e808-e817. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00252-7
Zhang, X., Gu, B., van Grinsven, H., Lam, S. K., Liang, X., Bai, M., & Chen, D. (2020). Societal benefits of halving agricultural ammonia emissions in China far exceed the abatement costs. Nature communications, 11(1), 4357. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18196-z
Zheng, J., Chien, A. A., & Suh, S. (2020). Mitigating curtailment and carbon emissions through load migration between data centers. Joule, 4(10), 2208-2222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.08.001
Zhou, Y., Bao, M., Chen, X., & Xu, X. (2016). Co-op advertising and emission reduction cost sharing contracts and coordination in low-carbon supply chain based on fairness concerns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.097
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Morila, T. S., & Reis Junior, N. C.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todos os trabalhos publicados na Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering (BJPE) estão licenciados sob a Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Isso significa que:
-
Qualquer pessoa pode copiar, distribuir, exibir, adaptar, remixar e até utilizar comercialmente os conteúdos publicados na revista;
-
Desde que sejam atribuídos os devidos créditos aos autores e à BJPE como fonte original;
-
Não é exigida permissão adicional para reutilização, desde que respeitados os termos da licença.
Esta política está em conformidade com os princípios do acesso aberto, promovendo a ampla disseminação do conhecimento científico.
2.png)
