Clinical and epidemiological profile of patients with endometriosis in a gynecological service in Espírito Santo

a preliminary study

Authors

  • Neide Aparecida Tosato Boldrini Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
  • Mara Rejane Barroso Barcelos Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
  • Carlos Alberto Faria Leite Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/rbps.v26isupl_3.03

Keywords:

Endometriosis, Pelvic Pain, Clinical Epidemiology, Infertility

Abstract

Introduction: Endometriosis is a chronic and inflammatory clinical pathology, characterized by the presence of functional endometrial tissue outside the uterus. Objectives: The following article seeks to identify the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients with endometriosis in a reference gynecology service in Espírito Santo, with the aim of sensitizing professionals regarding the suspicion of the presence of the disease. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study involving 130 patients with pelvic pain, aged between 18 and 55 years old, who were submitted to a form to collect epidemiological and clinical data, and then underwent a physical examination and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Results: Of the 130 patients interviewed, 63 had a positive diagnosis of endometriosis. The most frequent symptoms were dysmenorrhea (92%) and dyspareunia (77.7%). The most specific symptoms were dysuria (65.6%) and dyschesia (64.1%). In the epidemiological analysis, 42.9% were aged between 40 – 49 years old, 68.2% were married and 49.2% had completed secondary education. Conclusion: It was possible to identify that the majority of patients were aged between 40 and 49 years old (42.9%), showing a late diagnosis compared to other populations. Among the most common symptoms studied, dysmenorrhea (92%) and dyspareunia (77.7%) were the most sensitive symptoms. Dysuria (65.6%) and pain when evacuating (64.1%) were the most specific. Thus, these associated symptoms can be extremely valuable for clinical suspicion and diagnostic management of cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bendifallah S, Suisse S, Puchar A, Delbos L, Poilblanc M, Descamps P, et al. Salivary MicroRNA Signature for Diagnosis of Endometriosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(3):612.

2. Bellelis P, Dias JA, Podgaec S, Gonzales M, Baracat EC, Abrão MS. Aspectos epidemiológicos e clínicos da endometriose pélvica: uma série de casos. Revista Da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2010; 56(4):467–71.

3. Allaire C, Bedaiwy MA, Yong PJ. Diagnostic et gestion thérapeutique de l’endométriose. CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2023; 18;195(24).

4. Vercellini P, Fedele L, Aimi G, Pietropaolo G, Consonni D, Crosignani PG. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Human Reproduction. 2006; 22(1):266–71.

5. Brawn J, Morotti M, Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Vincent K. Central changes associated with chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis. Human Reproduction Update. 2014; 20(5):737–47.

6. Barra F, Zorzi C, Albanese M, De Mitri P, Stepniewska A, Roviglione G, et al. Ultrasonographic characterization of parametrial endometriosis: a prospective study. Fertility and Sterility. 2024.

7. Zhang X, He T, Shen W. Comparison of physical examination, ultrasound techniques and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis: A systematic review and meta analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2020; 20:3208.

8. Agarwal SK, Chapron C, Giudice LC, Laufer MR, Leyland N, Missmer SA, et al. Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; 220(4):354.e1-354.e12.

9. Young SL. Nonsurgical approaches to the diagnosis and evaluation of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility. 2024; 121(2):140–4.

10. Hansen KE, Kesmodel US, Baldursson EB, Kold M, Forman A. Visceral syndrome in endometriosis patients. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology/European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2014; 1;179:198–203.

11. Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, D’Hooghe T, De Cicco Nardone F, De Cicco Nardone C, et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertility and Sterility. 2011; 96(2):366-373.e8.

12. Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J. What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility [Internet]. 2006; 86(5):1296–301.

13. Simoens S, Dunselman G, Dirksen C, Hummelshoj L, Bokor A, Brandes I, et al. The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Human Reproduction. 2012; 27(5):1292–9.

14. Montgomery GW, Nyholt DR, Zhao ZZ, Treloar SA, Painter JN, Missmer SA, et al. The search for genes contributing to endometriosis risk. Human Reproduction Update. 2008; 14(5):447–57.

15. Rahmioglu N, Mortlock S, Ghiasi M, Møller PL, Stefansdottir L, Galarneau G, et al. The genetic basis of endometriosis and comorbidity with other pain and inflammatory conditions. Nature Genetics [Internet]. 2023; 55(3):423–36.

16. Bonocher CM, Montenegro ML, Silva JCRE, Ferriani RA, Meola J. Endometriosis and physical exercises: a systematic review. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2014 ;12(1):4.

17. Prescott J, Farland LV, Tobias DK, Gaskins AJ, Spiegelman D, Chavarro JE, et al. A prospective cohort study of endometriosis and subsequent risk of infertility. Human Reproduction. 2016; 31(7):1475–82.

18. Peter AW, Adamson GD, Al-Jefout M, Becker CM, D’Hooghe TM, Dunselman G a. J, et al. Research Priorities for Endometriosis: Recommendations from a Global Consortium of Investigators in Endometriosis. Reproductive Sciences. 2017; 24(2):202–26.

19. Hudelist G, Oberwinkler KH, Singer CF, Tuttlies F, Rauter G, Ritter O, et al. Combination of transvaginal sonography and clinical examination for preoperative diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. Human Reproduction. 2009; 24(5):1018–24.

20. Hudelist G, Ballard K, English J, Wright J, Banerjee S, Mastoroudes H, et al. Transvaginal sonography vs. clinical examination in the preoperative diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011; 37(4):480–7.

21. Ballard K, Lane H, Hudelist G, Banerjee S, Wright J. Can specific pain symptoms help in the diagnosis of endometriosis? A cohort study of women with chronic pelvic pain. Fertility and Sterility. 2010; 94(1):20–7.

22. Gete DG, Doust J, Mortlock S, Montgomery G, Mishra GD. Associations between endometriosis and common symptoms: findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; 229(5):536.e1-536.e20.

23. Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, Marshall LM, Hunter DJ. Incidence of Laparoscopically Confirmed Endometriosis by Demographic, Anthropometric, and Lifestyle Factors. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2004; 160(8):784–96.

Published

2025-02-11

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais

How to Cite

1.
Clinical and epidemiological profile of patients with endometriosis in a gynecological service in Espírito Santo: a preliminary study. RBPS [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 11 [cited 2026 Mar. 21];26(supl_3):23-8. Available from: https://periodicos.ufes.br/rbps/article/view/47621

Similar Articles

1-10 of 150

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.