Basic Health Care: a comparison between prenatal care in the Family Health Unit and in traditional services

Authors

  • Luciana Cavalcante Costa UNIVERSIDADE FERDERAL DO MARANHÃO
  • Livia dos Santos Rodrigues Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto-SP, Brasil.
  • Letícia Silva Bringel Universidade Federal do Maranhão – São Luís (MA), Brasil. Curso de Enfermagem
  • Andressa Bastos e Bastos Universidade Federal do Maranhão – São Luís (MA), Brasil. Curso de Enfermagem
  • Millena Marreiros dos Santos Universidade Federal do Maranhão – São Luís (MA), Brasil. Curso de Enfermagem
  • Edivaldo Pinheiro Meneses Filho Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brasil
  • Adriana Sousa Rêgo Universidade CEUMA, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão de Programas e Serviços de Saúde– São Luís (MA), Brasil
  • Rosangela Fernandes Lucena Batista Universidade Federal do Maranhão – São Luís (MA), Brasil. Departamento de Saúde Pública

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/rbps.v23i1.31787

Keywords:

Pregnant women, Prenatal care, Family Health Strategy, Maternal Health Services, Unified Health System

Abstract

Introduction: The Family Health Strategy (FHS) program is a gateway to health services, such as prenatal care in Primary Care, which helps preventing, early identifying and treating undesirable events during pregnancy, at childbirth and to newborns. Objectives: Comparing socioeconomic, demographic, obstetric and prenatal care features between pregnant women followed-up in the Family Health Strategy (FHS) and those treated in other public health services in São Luís City - MA. Methods: Descriptive study based on data deriving from BRISA cohort, conducted with probabilistic sample comprising 4,250 women; analyses were performed through chi-square test. Results: in total, 38.2% of the investigated women were assisted by the FHS; they differed from each other as to age and professional occupation of the head of the family. Women treated by FHS were the ones who attended more than at least 4 to 6 nursing consultations (p <0.001), who had adequate prenatal care (p = 0.005), who received more instructions about toxoplasmosis (p <0.001) and breastfeeding (p <0.001) and who underwent breast examination (p <0.001). Conclusion: Women differed from each other in socioeconomic, demographic and prenatal care features between healthcare models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2022-04-08

How to Cite

1.
Cavalcante Costa L, dos Santos Rodrigues L, Silva Bringel L, Bastos e Bastos A, Marreiros dos Santos M, Pinheiro Meneses Filho E, et al. Basic Health Care: a comparison between prenatal care in the Family Health Unit and in traditional services. RBPS [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 8 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];23(1):79-86. Available from: https://periodicos.ufes.br/rbps/article/view/31787

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais

Most read articles by the same author(s)