Comparando semipresidencialismos

similitudes y diferencias entre los casos de Democratización Posteriores a la Tercera Ola

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v13i1.48811

Palabras clave:

Sistemas gubernamentales, semipresidencialismo, tercera ola de democratización, análisis comparativo

Resumen

El propósito central de este artículo es comprender qué patrones políticos e institucionales emergen en los países que adoptaron el semipresidencialismo después de la tercera ola de democratización. En un diseño transversal y teniendo al país como unidad de análisis, identificamos 47 casos que fueron analizados descriptivamente a partir de características políticas e institucionales, tales como el grado de democratización, el subtipo de semipresidencialismo, la pertenencia anterior a um país semipresidencialista y la familia de sistema electoral adoptado para la cámara baja. Entre los hallazgos más relevantes está que los sistemas semipresidenciales post-tercera ola tienden a ser democracias, tienen arreglos de primer-presidencialismos, sistemas electorales proporcionales y la vinculación anterior a países que poseían el sistema semipresidencial.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Marcelo Martins Vieira, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

    Doutor em Ciência Política pelo IESP-UERJ. Professor Adjunto do Departamento de Ciências Sociais e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais da UFES. 

  • Raysa Dantas Loureiro, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

    Estudiante de doctorado en Ciencias Sociales en la Universidad Federal de Espírito Santo. Beca CAPES

  • Maria Vitória Rodrigues Silva, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

    Licenciada en Ciencias Sociales por la Universidad Federal de Espírito Santo (UFES)

Referencias

ÅBERG, Jenny; SEDELIUS, Thomas. (2018). “A Structured Review of Semi-Presidential Studies: Debates, Results, and Missing Pieces”. British Journal of Political Science, v. 50, n. 3, pp. 1111-1136. [Consult. 29-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000017

ALIZADA, Nazifa; COLE, Rowan; GASTALDI, Lisa; GRAHN, Sandra; HELLMEIER, Sebastian; KOLVANI, Palina; LACHAPELLE, Jean; LÜHRMANN, Anna; MAERZ, Seraphine; PILLAI, Shreeya; Lindberg; Staffan. (2021). “Autocratization Turns Viral”. Democracy Report 2021. University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute, [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://v-dem.net/documents/12/dr_2021.pdf.

AL JAZEERA. Timeline: A history of coups in Niger. Al Jazeera, 27 jul. 2023. [Consult. 04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/7/27/timeline-a-history-of-coups-in-niger.

ALTMAN, David. (2000). “The politics of coalition formation and survival in multiparty presidential democracies: the Case of Uruguay, 1989-1999”. Party Politics. v. 06, n. 03, pp. 259-283. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068800006003001

ALTMAN, David; CASTIGLIONI, Rossana. (2010). “Gabinetes ministeriales y reformas estructurales en América Latina, 1985-2000”. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política. v.18, n.01, pp. 15-39. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/rucp/v18n1/v18n1a05.pdf

AMORIM NETO, Octavio. (2016) Presidencialismo e governabilidade nas Américas. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, Konrad Adenauer Stiffung, 217 pp.

AMORIM NETO, Octavio. Semi-Presidentialism in Portugal: Academic Quarrels amidst Institutional Stability. In: Fernandes, J. M.; Magalhães, P. C.; Costa Pinto, A. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Portuguese Politics. New York, Oxford University Press, 2023. pp. 121-135.

AMORIM NETO, Octávio; Costa Lobo, Marina. (2009). “Portugal’s Semi-Presidentialism

(Re)considered: An Assessment of the President’s Role in the Policy Process, 1976–

2006”. European Journal of Political Research 48, no. 2, 234-255. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00833.x

BAUDAIS, Virginie; CHAUZAL, Grégory. (2011). “The 2010 Coup d’État in Niger: A Praetorian Regulation of Politics?”. Africa Affairs, v. 110, n. 439, pp. 295-304. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adr017

Bbc News Brasil. Crise política no Peru: entenda a dissolução do Congresso pelo presidente Martín Vizcarra. BBC News Brasil, 1º out. 2019. [Consult.04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/internacional-49892979

BEUMAN, Lydia M. (2013). “Cohabitation in New Post-Conflict Democracies: The Case of TimorLeste”. Parliamentary Affairs, 2014. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gst016

CAMERON, Maxwell A. (1998). “Self-Coups: Peru, Guatemala, and Russia”. Journal of Democracy, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 1, pp. 125-139. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1998.0003

CHANDLER, Andrea. (2001). “Presidential Veto Power in Post-Communist Russia, 1994–1998”. Canadian Journal of Political Science 34, no. 3, 487–516, 2001. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423901777980

CHASQUETTI, Daniel. (2001). “Democracia, multipartidismo y coaliciones en América Latina: evaluando la dificil combinacion”, in Tipos de presidencialismo y coaliciones políticas en America Latina. Colección Grupos de Trabajo de CLACSO, Buenos Aires. pp. 319-359, 2001. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/clacso/gt/20101028021442/11chasquetti.pd

CHEIBUB, José Antônio. (2002). “Minority governments, deadlock situations, and the survival of presidential democracies”. Comparative Political Studies. v. 35, n. 03, pp. 284. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035003002

CHEIBUB, José Antônio; PRZEWORSKI, Adam; SAIEGH, Sebastian. (2004). “Government coalitions and legislative success under presidentialism and parliamentarism”. British Journal of Political Science, v. 34, pp. 565-587, 2004. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000195

CHEIBUB, José Antônio; CHERNYKH, Svetlana. (2009). “Are semi-presidential constitutions bad for democratic performance?”. Constitutional Political Economy, v. 20, n. 3–4, pp. 202–229. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-008-9072-2

COPPEDGE, Michael; GERRING, John; LINDBERG, Staffan; SKAANING, Svend-Erik; TEORELL, Jan. (2017). “V-Dem Comparisons and Contrasts with Other Measurement Projects”. Working Paper. Series, The Varieties of Democracy Institute. University of Gothenburg, Department of Political Science, n. 45. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://www.v-dem.net/media/publications/v-dem_working_paper_2017_45.pdf

CUCHIARO, Marcus Vinícius. (2022). “O Regime Semipresidencialista: as bases teóricas e sua aplicação em França e Portugal”. ÎANDÉ - Ciências e Humanidades, v. 6, n. 1, pp. 29-45. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.36942/iande.v6i1.434

DEHEZA, Grace I. (1997). Gobiernos de coalición en el sistema presidencial: América del Sur. Phd dissertation. [s.l.] European University Institute, Florence.

DUVERGER, Maurice. (1970). Institutions politiques et Droit constitutionnel. 11. ed. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

DUVERGER, Maurice. (1978). E´chec au Roi. Paris, Albin Michel.

DUVERGER, Maurice. (1980). “A new political system model: semi-presidential government”. European Journal ofPolitica1 Research, v. 8, pp. 165-187. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00569.x

DUVERGER, Maurice (ed). (1986). Les régimes semi-présidentiels. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

ELGIE, Robert. (1999). The Politics of SemiPresidentialism, in Semi-presidentialism in Europe (Comparative Politics). 1. ed. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 320.

ELGIE, Robert. (2005). “A Fresh Look at Semi-Presidentialism: Variations on a Theme”. Journal of Democracy, v. 16, n. 3, pp. 98-112. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2005.0045

ELGIE, Robert. (2007). “What is semi-presidentialism and where is it found?”, in Elgie, R.; Moestrup, S. (Eds.). Semipresidentialism outside Europe: A comparative study. London: Routledge.

ELGIE, Robert. (2016). Three waves of semi-presidential studies. Democratization, v. 23, n. 1, pp. 49-70. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Diponível em https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.960853

ELGIE, Robert; SCHLEITER, Petra. (2011). “Variation in the Durability of Semi-Presidential Democracies” in R. Elgie, S. Moestrup e Y. S. Wu (Eds.). Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. pp. 42-60.

ELGIE, Robert; FAUVELLE-AYMAR, Christine. (2012). “Turnout Under Semipresidentialism: Firstand Second-Order Elections to National-Level Institutions”. Comparative Political Studies, v. 45, n. 12, pp. 1598-1623. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em 10.1177/0010414012463903

FOWKS, Jacqueline. (2019). Presidente do Peru dissolve Congresso e oposição reage com suspensão do mandatário. El País Brasil, 1º out. 2019. [Consult.04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2019/10/01/internacional/1569957204_773363.html

FIGUEIREDO, Argelina; LIMONGI, Fernando. Executivo e Legislativo na Nova Ordem Constitucional. Rio de Janeiro, Editora FGV, 1999.

FRANCE 24. Junta chief named interim president. France 24, 22 fev. 2010.[Consult. 04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://www.france24.com/en/20100222-junta-chief-named-interim-president

G1. (2019). Nomeada pelo Congresso para substituir presidente do Peru, Mercedes Aráoz renuncia. G1, 2 out. 2019. [Consult.04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://g1.globo.com/mundo/noticia/2019/10/02/nomeada-pelo-congresso-para-substituir-presidente-do-peru-mercedes-araoz-renuncia.ghtml

G1. (2020). Após presidente fechar Congresso, Peru tem eleições para escolher novos parlamentares. G1, 26 jan. 2020. [Consult.04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://g1.globo.com/mundo/noticia/2020/01/26/apos-presidente-fechar-congresso-peru-tem-eleicoes-para-escolher-novos-parlamentares.ghtml

GUSSOLI, Felipe K.; HACHEM, Daniel W. (2022). “Modificação do sistema de governo no Brasil via emenda constitucional: parlamentarismo, semi-presidencialismo e outros modelos”. Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos, Florianópolis, v. 43, n. 92, pp. 1-35. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2022.e91977

HICKEN, Allen; STOLL, Heather. (2013). “Are All Presidents Created Equal? Presidential Powers and the Shadow of Presidential Elections”. Comparative Political Studies, v. 46, n. 3, pp. 291-319. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453694

HIROI, Taeko; OMORI, Sawa. (2009). “Perils of Parliamentarism? Political Systems and the Stability of Democracy Revisited”. Democratization, v. 16, n. 3, pp. 485-507. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340902884598

HUNTINGTON, Samuel. (1991). “Democracy´s third wave”. Journal of Democracy, pp. 12–34. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0016

JALALI, Carlos. (2011). “The President is not a Passenger: Portugal’s Evolving Semi-presidentialism”, in R. Elgie, S. Moestrup e Y. S. Wu. (Orgs). Semi-presidentialism and Democracy. London, Palgrave Macmillan.

LATIMES. Peru’s Shock Treatment Plan Brings Sudden Pain, Uncertain Gain. Los Angeles Times, 28 jan. 1996. [Consult.04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-01-28-mn-29617-story.html.

LIJPHART, Arendt. (2003). Modelos de Democracia: Desempenho e Padrões de Governo em 36 países. Rio de Janeiro, Civilização Brasileira.

LIJPHART, Arendt. (1992). Introduction. Parliamentary versus presidential government, pp. 1-27.

LINZ, Juan. (1990). “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Journal of Democracy, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 51-69. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2005.0026

LINZ, Juan. (1994). Democracy: Presidential or Parliamentary Does it Make a Difference? In: Linz, J.; Valenzuela, A. (Eds.). The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.

LINZ, Juan; STEPAN, Alfred. (1996) Problems of Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.

LOUREIRO, Raysa D. (2020). Semipresidencialismo e a longevidade dos governos de coabitação: um estudo de casos diversos sobre Bulgária, Romênia, França e Portugal. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Centro de Ciências Humanas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Vitória, pp. 115.

MAEDA, Ko. (2010). “Two Modes of Democratic Breakdown: A Competing Risks Analysis of Democratic Durability”. Journal of Politics, v. 72, n. 4, pp. 1129-1143. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000575

MAINWARING, Scott. (1993). “Presidentialism, Multipartism and Democracy: The Difficult Combination”. Comparative Political Studies, v. 26, n. 2, pp. 198-228. [Consult 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093026002003

MAINWARING, Scott.; SHUGART, Matthew Soberg. Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997.

MEJÍA ACOSTA, A. Informal coalitions and policymaking in Latin America: Ecuador in comparative perspective. New York, Routledge, [s.d.].

METCALF, Lee Kendal. (2000). “Measuring Presidential Power”. Comparative Political Studies, v. 33, n. 5, pp. 660-685. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140000330050

MOESTRUP, Sophia. (2007). “Semi-presidentialism in Niger Gridlock and democratic breakdown – learning from past mistakes”, in R. Elgie, S. Moestrup e Y. S. Wu (Eds.). Semi-presidentialism outside Europe: A comparative study. New York, Routledge, 2007. pp. 105–120.

NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MUSEUM. White Terror Period. National Human Rights Museum, Taiwan, [s.d.]. [Consult.04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://www.nhrm.gov.tw/w/nhrmEN/White_Terror_Period

NEGRETTO, Gabriel. (2006). “Minority presidents and democratic performance”. Latin American Politics and Society, v. 48, n. 03, pp. 63-92. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2006.tb00356.x

NEW YORK TIMES. Peru’s Poor Feel Hardship of ‘Fuji Shock’ Austerity. The New York Times, 12 ago. 1990. [Consult.04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/12/world/peru-s-poor-feel-hardship-of-fuji-shock-austerity.html

OLIVEIRA, Augusto. (2024). “As três programações constitucionais contra crises políticas: sistemas de governo e estabilidade governamental em grandes democracias”. Revista Direito GV, São Paulo, v. 20, e2406. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202406.

O’NEIL, Patrick. (1993). “Presidential Power in Post-Communist Europe: The Hungarian Case in Comparative Perspective”. Journal of Communist Studies, v. 9, n. 3, pp. 177-201. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279308415218

PAREDES, Maritza; ENCINAS, Daniel. (2020). “Perú 2019: Political Crisis and Institutional Outcome”. Revista de Ciencia Política, v. 40, n. 2, pp. 483-510. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2020005000116

PIERCE, Roy. (1991). “The Executive Divided Against Itself: Cohabitation in France, 1986-1988”. Governance, v. 4, n. 3, pp. 270-294. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1991.tb00016.x

PROTSYK, Oleh. (2006). “Intra-Executive Competition between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of Institutional Conflict and Cooperation under Semi-Presidentialism”. Political Studies, v. 54, pp. 219–244. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Diponível em https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00604.x

PROTSYK, Oleh. (2005). “Prime Ministers’ Identity in Semi-Presidential Regimes: Constitutional Norms and Cabinet Formation Outcomes”. European Journal of Political Research, v. 44, pp. 721-748. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00245.x

READ, James S. (1991). “Nigeria’s New Constitution for 1992: The third Republic”. Journal of African Law, v. 35, pp. 174-193. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300008421

ROPER, Steven. (2002). “Are All Semipresidential Regimes the Same? A Comparison of PremierPresidential Regimes”. Comparative Politics, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 253-272. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/ 10.2307/4146953

SANTOS, Fabiano. (2003). Poder Legislativo no Presidencialismo de Coalizão. Belo Horizonte, Editora UFMG.

SANTOS, Fabio L. B. dos. (2019). Perversão e trauma: impasses da política peruana contemporânea, in Uma história da onda progressista sul-americana (1998-2016). [s.l.] Editora Elefante, 2019. pp. 409-452.

SHUGART, Matthew Soberg; SAMUELS, David. (2010). Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. New York, Cambridge University Press.

SARTORI, Giovanni. (1994). Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes. London, McMillan.

SCHLEITER, Petra. (2003). “Mixed Constitutions and Political Instability”. Democratization, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 1-26. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1080/714000106

SCHLEITER, Petra; MORGAN­JONES, Edward. (2007). “Semipresidencialismo: decisiones constitucionales y consecuencias políticas”. Politica y Gobierno, v. XIV, n. 2, pp. 513–549. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/pyg/v14n2/1665-2037-pyg-14-02-515.pdf

SCHLEITER, Petra; MORGAN­JONES, Edward. (2009a). “Review Article: Citizens, Presidents and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism beyond Duverger and Linz. British Journal of Political Science, v. 39, n. 04, pp. 871-892. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990159

SCHLEITER, Petra; MORGAN ­JONES, Edward. (2009b). “Constitutional Power and Competing Risks: Monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and the Termination of East and West European Cabinets”. American Political Science Review , v. 103, pp. 496-512. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990062

SCHLEITER, Petra; MORGAN ­JONES, Edward. (2010). “Who’s in Charge? Presidents, Assemblies, and the Political Control of Semipresidential Cabinets”. Comparative Political Studies, v. 43, pp. 1415–1441. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010371904

SEDELIUS, Thomas.; EKMAN, Joakim. (2010). “Intra-executive Conflict and Cabinet Instability: Effects of Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe”. Government and Opposition, v. 45, n. 04, pp. 505-530. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01325.x

SEDELIUS, Thomas; MASHTALER, Olga. (2013). Two Decades of Semi-Presidentialism: Issues of Intra-Executive Conflict in Central and Eastern Europe 1991–2011. East European Politics, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 109–134. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.748662

SHUGART, Matthew S. (2005). “Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority”. French Politics, v. 3, pp. 323-351. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200087.

SHUGART, Matthew S.; CAREY, John. M. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

SIAROFF, Alan. (2003). “Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, SemiPresidential and Parliamentary Distinction’. European Journal of Political Research, v. 42, pp. 287-312. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00084

SKACH, Cindy. (2005). Borrowing Constitutional Designs: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic. New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

SVOLIK, Milan. (2008). “Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation.” American

Political Science Review. v. 102, n. 2, pp. 53-168. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.964462

OUTREACH FOR TAIWAN. (2025). Martial Law and the White Terror. OFTaiwan.org. [S.d.]. [Consult.04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://oftaiwan.org/history/white-terror/martial-law/

TAVITS, Margit. (2009). Presidents in Parliamentary Systems: Do Direct Elections Matter? Oxford, Oxford University Press.

TROXEL, Tiffany A. (2003). Parliamentary Power in Russia, 1994–2001: President vs Parliament. London, Palgrave.

TSAI, Jung-Hsiang. (2008). “Sub-Types of Semi-Presidentialism and Political Deadlock’. French Politics, v. 6, n. 1, pp. 63-84. [Consult. 30-07-2025]. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200140

TSANG, Steve; TIEN, Hung-mao. (1999). Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York, St. Martin´s Press.

ZAZNAEV, Oleg. (2014). “Understanding Semi-Presidentialism in Political Science: A Review of the Latest Debate”. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, v. 5, n. 14. [Consult. 30-07-2025] Disponível em https://doi.org. 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.02.14005

ZELAZNIK, Javier. The building of coalitions in the presidential systems of Latin America: an inquiry into the political conditions of governability. PhD Dissertation. [s.l.] University of Essex, 2001.

WASHINGTON POST. ‘Fujishock’ Pulls Peru Up Short. The Washington Post, 26 set. 1990. [Consult. 04-07-2025]. Disponível em https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1990/09/26/fujishock-pulls-peru-up-short/73a5c29d-ceea-47a7-9df8-cfb9594f6ae6

WU, Yu-Shan. (2011). Clustering of Semi-Presidentialism: A First Cut, in R. Elgie, S. Moestrup e Y. S. Wu (Eds.). Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. pp. 21-41.

WU, Yu-Shan; TSAI, Jung-Hsiang. (2011). “Taiwan: Democratic Consolidation under President-Parliamentarism”, in R. Elgie, S. Moestrup e Y. S. Wu. (org.). Semi-presidentialism and Democracy. 1. ed. London, Palgrave Macmillan London. pp. 174-191.

Publicado

07-05-2026

Número

Sección

Artigos livres

Cómo citar

Comparando semipresidencialismos: similitudes y diferencias entre los casos de Democratización Posteriores a la Tercera Ola. (2026). Simbiótica. Revista Eletrônica, 13(1), 237-271. https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v13i1.48811