Equilíbrio reflexivo prudente e a crise climática

Denis  Coitinho

doi:10.47456/sofia.v14i2.50951

Authors

Denis Coitinho UNISINOS – Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2592-5590

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/sofia.v14i2.50951

Keywords:

prudent reflective equilibrium, climate crisis, virtues, duties

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate to what extent the use of the reflective equilibrium (RE) method can point us towards our personal and institutional responsibility in the face of the climate crisis. To this end, I begin by characterizing the RE method and pointing out its limitations, especially its conservatism and relativism/subjectivism. Following this, I propose an alteration to the method, so as to allow for the use of the prudent agent's expertise in the initial selection of beliefs, in order to overcome the criticisms mentioned. The next step will then be to apply the prudent reflective equilibrium (PRE) method in the context of the climate crisis in order to identify our duties in the face of the problem and to understand the best course of public action. Finally, I make some concluding remarks on the problem investigated, suggesting some personal duties in the face of the climate crisis, as well as suggesting some courses of action that should be taken by the main public institutions to address the environmental problem.

Author Biography

Denis Coitinho, UNISINOS – Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos

Pós-doutorado na Universidade de Harvard, na London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) e no CEBRAP/SP - Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento. Doutor em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. É professor permanente do PPG em Filosofia da UNISINOS e pesquisador PQ do CNPq. Pesquisa na área de Ética e Filosofia Política, investigando os seguintes temas: teorias da justiça e das virtudes, responsabilidade moral e punição, direitos humanos e democracia.

References

BEAUCHAMP, Tom L.; CHILDRESS, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

BRANDT, Richard. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.

BRINK, David. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

CATH, Yuri. Reflective equilibrium. In: H. CAPPELEN, H.; GENDLER, T.; HAWTHORNE, J. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 213-230.

COITINHO, Denis. Prudent reflective equilibrium. Ethics in Progress, vol. 14, n. 1, 2023, p. 46-63.

COITINHO, Denis. Contrato & Virtudes III: Problemas Epistemológico-morais e Metodológicos. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2024a.

COITINHO, Denis. Refletindo sobre a injustiça ambiental. Griot: Revista de Filosofia, vol. 24, n. 3, 2024b, p. 168-181.

COITINHO, Denis. Artificial intelligence and reflective equilibrium. In: GOUVEIA, Steven (Ed.). Ethics in Artificial Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Ethics International Press, UK, 2025, p. 51-82.

DANIELS, Norman. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

DIRECTOR, Samuel. Intuitions, biases, and extra-wide reflective equilibrium. Metaphilosophy, vol. 51, n. 5, 2020, p. 1-11.

HARE, Richard M. Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 23, 1973, p. 144-155.

HARMAN, Gilbert. Three trends in moral and political philosophy. Journal of Value Inquiry, vol. 37, n. 3, 2003, p. 415-425.

IPCC – THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Disponível em: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-ii/. Acesso 20/08/2025.

KELLY, Thomas; McGRATH, Sarah. Is reflective equilibrium enough? Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 24, n. 1, 2010, p. 325-359.

KRENAK, Ailton. A Vida não é Útil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2020.

LYONS, David. Nature and soundness of the contract and coherence arguments. In: DANIELS, N. (Org.). Reading Rawls. New York: Basic Books, 1975, p. 141-167.

OLIVEIRA, F. Enchentes no RS têm muito a dizer sobre as injustiças climáticas. UOL, 06/05/2024. Disponível em: https://noticias.uol.com.br/colunas/presenca-historica/2024/05/06/enchentes-no-rs-tem-muito-a-dizer-sobre-as-injusticas-climaticas.htm. Acesso em 20/08/2025.

ONU – PROGRAMA PARA O MEIO AMBIENTE. ONU reconhece 10 iniciativas pioneiras que estão restaurando a natureza, 13/12/2022. Disponível em: https://www.unep.org/pt-br/noticias-e-reportagens/comunicado-de-imprensa/onu-reconhece-10-iniciativas-pioneiras-que-estao. Acesso em 27/08/2025.

RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge, MAS.: Harvard University Press, 1999.

RAWLS, John. The independence of moral theory. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 48, 1975, p. 5-22.

SAVULESCU, Julien; GYNGELL, Christopher; KAHANE, Guy. Collective reflective equilibrium in practice (CREP) and controversial novel technologies. Bioethics, 2021, p. 1-12.

SCOTTI, Guilherme; PEREIRA, Diego. Injustiça climática: a desigualdade social como violação à garantia de direitos. Revista Direito Público, vol. 19, n. 104, 2022, p. 288-315.

SINGER, Peter. Sidgwick and reflective equilibrium. Monist, vol. 58, n. 3, 1974, p. 490-517.

TERSMAN, F. Recent work on reflective equilibrium and method in ethics. Philosophy Compass, vol. 13, n. 6, 2018.

VAN DER BURG, Wibren. Pragmatist reflective equilibrium. Synthese, vol. 203, n. 2, 2024, p. 1-26.

VERDÉLIO, Andreia. Lula defende que Ibama autorize explorar petróleo na Foz do Amazonas. Agência Brasil, 12/02/2025. Disponível em: https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/politica/noticia/2025-02/lula-ibama-precisa-autorizar-exploracao-de-petroleo-na-foz-do-amazonas. Acesso 20/08/2025.

WALDEN, Kenneth. In defense of reflective equilibrium. Philosophical Studies, vol. 166, n. 2, 2013, p. 243-256.