Leibniz’s and Spinoza’s supposed critique of the Cartesian ‘picture-idea’

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/sofia.v12i2.42344

Keywords:

Leibniz, Spinoza, Descartes, idea-picture, theory of perception

Abstract

This paper’s aim is to try to answer the critique made by some Leibniz’s and Spinoza’s scholars against Descartes’s ‘idea-picture’. In the first part of this paper, I put forward Leibniz’s and Spinoza’s scholars arguments issued in order to criticize the Cartesian idea-picture. In the second part, I expose the reasons why I believe that it is possible to reject the critique of these scholars against the idea-picture. In my view, there are three fundamental elements which support my thesis: the sound comprehension of the expression idea tanquam rerum imagines, the Cartesian theory of ‘causal dissimilarity’ between the object of perception and the sensations brought about by it, and Descartes’ theory of innateness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

William de Jesus Teixeira, universidade de Brasília

Bacharel em filosofia pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB).

References

ABRANTES, P. Imagens de natureza, imagens de ciência. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UERJ, 2016.

AQUINO, T. Summa theologiae. Disponível em: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html. Acessado em 19/08/2023.

BELAVAL, Y. Leibniz critique de Descartes. Paris: Gallimard, 1960.

DESCARTES, R. Oeuvres de Descartes. (publiées par Charles Adam & Paul Tannery, 11 vol.). Paris: Vrin, 1996.

ESPINOSA, B. Ethica. Edição bilíngue. Tradução e notas de Tomas Tadeu. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2010.

FORLIN, E. Teoria Cartesiana da Verdade. São Paulo: Editora FAPESP, 2005.

GORHAM, G. Descartes on the innateness of all ideas. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Québec, v. 4, n. 2, p. 355-388, 2002.

HATFIELD, G; EPSTEIN, W. The sensory core and the medieval foundations of early modern perceptual theory. Isis, Chicago, v. 70, n. 3, p. 363-384. 1979.

KONTIC, S. A representação na mônada: expressão e ideias inatas em Leibniz. Discurso, São Paulo, v. 42, n. 2, 127-143, 2017.

KONTIC, S. Ideia, imagem e representação: Leibniz crítico de Descartes e Locke. 2014. 146 folhas. Dissertação de Mestrado em Filosofia. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2014.

KONTIC, S. Representação e perspectiva em Descartes e Leibniz. Ipseitas, São Carlos, v. 2, n. 1, 48-68, 2016.

LEIBNIZ, G. W. Opera philosophica: quae existant latina, gallica, germanica omnia. Aalen: Scientia, 1974.

LEIBNIZ, G. O que é ideia? (tradução de Guilherme Ivo). Revista Conatus, Recife, v. 9, n. 18, 57-60, 2015.

PEARCE, K. Leibniz and the Veridicality of Body Perceptions. Philosopher’s Imprint, Michigan, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 1-17, 2016.

PURYEAR, S. Leibniz’s Alleged Ambivalence about Sensible Qualities. Studia Leibnitiana, Berlin, Bd. 44, H. 2, p. 229-245, 2012.

RADNER, D. Spinoza’s theory of ideas. The philosophical review. Durham, v. 80, n. 3, p. 338-359, 1971.

Published

18-11-2023

How to Cite

Teixeira, W. de J. (2023). Leibniz’s and Spinoza’s supposed critique of the Cartesian ‘picture-idea’. Sofia , 12(2), e12242344. https://doi.org/10.47456/sofia.v12i2.42344