Basic Health Care: a comparison between prenatal care in the Family Health Unit and in traditional services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/rbps.v23i1.31787Keywords:
Pregnant women, Prenatal care, Family Health Strategy, Maternal Health Services, Unified Health SystemAbstract
Introduction: The Family Health Strategy (FHS) program is a gateway to health services, such as prenatal care in Primary Care, which helps preventing, early identifying and treating undesirable events during pregnancy, at childbirth and to newborns. Objectives: Comparing socioeconomic, demographic, obstetric and prenatal care features between pregnant women followed-up in the Family Health Strategy (FHS) and those treated in other public health services in São Luís City - MA. Methods: Descriptive study based on data deriving from BRISA cohort, conducted with probabilistic sample comprising 4,250 women; analyses were performed through chi-square test. Results: in total, 38.2% of the investigated women were assisted by the FHS; they differed from each other as to age and professional occupation of the head of the family. Women treated by FHS were the ones who attended more than at least 4 to 6 nursing consultations (p <0.001), who had adequate prenatal care (p = 0.005), who received more instructions about toxoplasmosis (p <0.001) and breastfeeding (p <0.001) and who underwent breast examination (p <0.001). Conclusion: Women differed from each other in socioeconomic, demographic and prenatal care features between healthcare models.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Saúde/Brazilian Journal of Health Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors and reviewers must disclose any financial, professional, or personal conflicts of interest that could influence the results or interpretations of the work. This information will be treated confidentially and disclosed only as necessary to ensure transparency and impartiality in the publication process.
Copyright
RBPS adheres to the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning authors retain copyright of their work submitted to the journal.
- Originality Declaration: Authors must declare that their submission is original, has not been previously published, and is not under review elsewhere.
- Publication Rights: Upon submission, authors grant RBPS the exclusive right of first publication, subject to peer review.
- Additional Agreements: Authors may enter into non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the RBPS-published version (e.g., in institutional repositories or as book chapters), provided the original authorship and publication by RBPS are acknowledged.
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., institutional repositories or personal websites) after initial publication in RBPS, with appropriate citation of authorship and original publication.
Under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, readers have the rights to:
- Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material.
These rights cannot be revoked, provided the following terms are met:
- Attribution: Proper credit must be given, a link to the license provided, and any changes clearly indicated.
- Non-Commercial: The material cannot be used for commercial purposes.
- No Additional Restrictions: No legal or technological measures may be applied to restrict others from doing anything the license permits.