Crepuscular landscapes: rethinking human-coyote relations in situations involving fog in a Costa Rican rural community

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v9i3.39804

Keywords:

Antropoceno, Canis latrans, Ecologias afetivas, Interação humano-animal

Abstract

This paper critically reflects on human-coyote interactions emerging from more-than-human entanglements in San Gerado de Oreamuno, localized in Cartago province (Costa Rica). Through a sensory perspective, I examine the role of fog in (re)configuring an “multinatural territory” that affects relations between many vitalities. I also provide some theoretical insights from multispecies ethnography and more-than-human geography to problematize human-nature dichotomy and begin to understand the affective atmospheres involved in both physical experiences and oral accounts of local people. Finally, I suggest that my own interests provide me of interesting lens to frame the meanings attributed to fog and its influence on the emergence of “proximity ecologies” that determine human-coyote relations in that community.

Keywords: Anthropocene; Canis latrans; Affective ecologies; Human-animal interaction. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luis Miguel Barboza Arias, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Sociólogo, doutorando pelo Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento Rural, da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (PGDR-UFRGS) (Porto Alegre, Brasil). Bolsista do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Membro do Grupo Inovação, Sociedade e Eco-Territorialidades e da Red Políticas Públicas y Desarrollo Rural en América Latina y el Caribe (PP-AL).

References

ALMEIDA, Mauro WB (2021), “Anarquismo Ontológico e Verdade no Antropoceno”. Ilha, v. 23, n. 1, pp. 10-29 [Consult. 23-06-2022]. Disponível em https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ilha/article/view/78405

ANDERSON, Ben (2009), “Affective atmospheres”. Emotion, space and society, v. 2, n. 2, pp. 77-81

BARUA, Maan (2020), “Affective economies, pandas, and the atmospheric politics of lively capital”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, v. 45, n. 3, pp. 678-692 [Consult. 21-06-2022]. Disponível em https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/tran.12361

BENNETT, Jane (2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, N.C., Duke University Press.

BOONMAN‐BERSON, Susan; DRIESSEN, Clemens; TURNHOUT, Esther (2018), “Managing wild minds: From control by numbers to a multinatural approach in wild boar management in the Veluwe, the Netherlands”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, v. 44, n. 1, pp. 2-15 [Consult. 19-06-2022]. Disponível em https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/tran.12269

BRAUN, Bruce (2008), “Environmental issues: inventive life”. Progress in Human Geography, v. 32, n. 5, pp. 667-679 [Consult. 14-06-2022].

Disponível: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.455.4704&rep=rep1&type=pdf

BULLER, Henry (2008), “Safe from the wolf: biosecurity, biodiversity, and competing philosophies of nature”. Environment and Planning A, v. 40, n. 7, pp. 1583-1597 [Consult. 23-06-2022]. Disponível em https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a4055

DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Felix (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press.

ELLIOTT, Denielle; CULHANE Dara, (2016), A Different Kind of Ethnography: Imaginative Practices and Creative Methodologies. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

ELLIS, Rebecca (2021), Sensuous and spatial multispecies ethnography as a vehicle to the re-enchantment of everyday life: A case study of knowing bees. in: A. Hovorka, Alice et al. (eds.), A Research Agenda for Animal Geographies. Massachusetts, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 87-100.

FARINA, Almo (2021), Semiotic landscape ecology: A novel approach to reconcile environment and humanities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

FARINA, Almo; ELDRIDGE, Alice; LI, Peng (2021), “Ecoacoustics and multispecies semiosis: Naming, semantics, semiotic characteristics, and competencies”. Biosemiotics, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 141-165 [Consult. 11-06-2022]. Disponível em https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-021-09402-6

FIJN, Natasha (2021), “Donald Thomson: Observations of Animal Connections in Visual Ethnography in Northern Australia”. Ethnos, v. 86, n. 1, pp. 44-68 [Consult. 17-06-2022]. Disponível em https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00141844.2019.1606024?journalCode=retn20

FULLAGAR, Simone (2000), “Desiring nature: Identity and becoming in narratives of travel”. Journal for Cultural Research, v. 4, n. 1, pp. 58-76 [Consult. 22-06-2022]. Disponível em https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261647886_Desiring_nature_Identity_and_becoming_in_narratives_of_travel

HAUPTMAN, Jodi (2005), Beyond the visible: the art of Odilon Redon. New York, The Museum of Modern Art.

HEAD, Lesley (2016), Hope and grief in the Anthropocene: Re-conceptualising human–nature relations. New York, Routledge Press.

HINCHLIFFE, Steven (2007), Geographies of Nature: Societies, Environments, Ecologies. London: SAGE.

HINCHLIFFE, Steven; WHATMORE, Sarah (2006), “Living Cities: Towards a Politics of Conviviality”. Science as Culture, v. 15, n. 2, pp. 123-38 [Consult. 09-06-2022]. Disponível em https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315256351-24/living-cities-towards-politics-conviviality-steve-hinchliffe-sarah-whatmore

HODGETTS, Timothy; LORIMER, Jamie (2020), “Animals’ mobilities”. Progress in Human Geography, v. 44, n. 1, pp. 4-26 [Consult. 24-06-2022].

Disponível em https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309132518817829

HOWES, David (2019), “Multisensory anthropology”. Annual Review of Anthropology, v. 48, pp. 17-28 [Consult. 21-06-2022]. Disponível em https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011324

INGOLD, Tim (2013), “Prospect”. in: T. INGOLD, Tim; and G. Palsson (eds.) Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-21.

KIRKSEY, S. Eben; HELMREICH, Stefan (2010), “The emergence of multispecies ethnography”. Cultural anthropology, v. 25, n. 4, pp. 545-576 [Consult. 05-06-2022]. Disponível em https://anthropology.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/helmreich_multispecies_ethnography.pdf

LATOUR, Bruno (2004), “How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies”. Body & Society, v. 10, pp. 205–229 [Consult. 07-06-2022]. Disponível em http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/77-BODY-NORMATIVE-BS-GB.pdf

LORIMER, Jamie (2010), “Moving image methodologies for more than-human geographies”. Cultural Geographies, v. 17, n. 2, pp. 237–258 [Consult. 19-06-2022]. Disponível em https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1474474010363853

LORIMER, Jamie (2015), Wildlife in the Anthropocene: conservation after nature. USA, U of Minnesota Press.

NIEHAUS, Carmen et al, (2011), “Presencia de protozoarios y microorganismos relacionados con procesos de inmunosupresión humana en coyotes (Canis Latrans: Canidae) del Parque Nacional Volcán Irazú y campo agrícola limítrofe en Costa Rica”. Revista Ibero-latinoamericana de Parasitología, v. 70, n. 2, pp. 197-205.

PERLOFF, Nancy Lynn (1995), “Gauguin's French baggage: decadence and colonialism in Tahiti”. in: E. BARKAN and R. BUSH, Ronald (eds.) Prehistories of the future: the primitivist project and the culture of modernism. California, Stanford University Press, pp. 226-269.

PINK, Sarah (2009), Doing Sensory Ethnography. London, Sage.

ROSENZWEIG, Michael (2003), Win-Win Ecology: How the Earth’s Species Can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

VAN DOOREN, Thom; BIRD ROSE, Deborah (2012), "Storied-places in a multispecies city." Humanimalia v. 3, n. 2, pp. 1-27. [Consult. 11-06-2022]. Disponível em https://humanimalia.org/article/view/10046

WHATMORE, Sarah (2002), Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. California, Sage.

WILSON, Helen F, (2019) “Animal Encounters: a genre of contact”. in A. BÖHM and J. ULLRICH (eds.) Animal Encounters, Cultural Animal Studies 4. Germany, Stuttgart J.B. Metzler, pp. 25-41.

Published

26-12-2022

How to Cite

Arias, L. M. B. (2022). Crepuscular landscapes: rethinking human-coyote relations in situations involving fog in a Costa Rican rural community. Simbiótica. Revista Eletrônica, 9(3), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v9i3.39804