Paisajes crepusculares: repensando las relaciones humanos- coyotes a partir de la niebla en el contexto de una comunidad rural en Costa Rica

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v9i3.39804

Palabras clave:

Antropoceno, Canis latrans, Ecologias afetivas, Interação humano-animal

Resumen

Este trabajo ofrece una perspectiva relacional para reflexionar críticamente sobre las formas de participación de humanos, coyotes y otras entidades más-allá-de-lo-humano en la comunidad rural de San Gerardo de Oreamuno, localizada en la provincia de Cartago (Costa Rica). La niebla es un elemento característico del paisaje durante la mayor parte del año, y contribuye a (re)configurar un “territorio multinatural” que afecta las relaciones entre diferentes vitalidades. Utilizo las perspectivas de la etnografía multiespécies y de la geografía más-que-humana para tensionar imaginarios socioculturales sobre la dicotomía entre naturaleza y cultura, y, de esa forma, generar conocimiento sobre las atmósferas afectivas y sensoriales involucradas en las vivencias y relatos de las personas de la comunidad. Por último, argumento que mi propia experiencia de trabajo empírico me proporciona elementos útiles para profundizar en la comprensión de los significados a la niebla y su influencia en el surgimiento de las “ecologías de la proximidad” que determinan las relaciones humanos-coyotes en esa comunidad.

Palabras clave: Antropoceno; Canis latrans; Ecologías afectivas; Interacción humano-animal. 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Luis Miguel Barboza Arias, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Sociólogo, doutorando pelo Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento Rural, da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (PGDR-UFRGS) (Porto Alegre, Brasil). Bolsista do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Membro do Grupo Inovação, Sociedade e Eco-Territorialidades e da Red Políticas Públicas y Desarrollo Rural en América Latina y el Caribe (PP-AL).

Citas

ALMEIDA, Mauro WB (2021), “Anarquismo Ontológico e Verdade no Antropoceno”. Ilha, v. 23, n. 1, pp. 10-29 [Consult. 23-06-2022]. Disponível em https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ilha/article/view/78405

ANDERSON, Ben (2009), “Affective atmospheres”. Emotion, space and society, v. 2, n. 2, pp. 77-81

BARUA, Maan (2020), “Affective economies, pandas, and the atmospheric politics of lively capital”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, v. 45, n. 3, pp. 678-692 [Consult. 21-06-2022]. Disponível em https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/tran.12361

BENNETT, Jane (2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, N.C., Duke University Press.

BOONMAN‐BERSON, Susan; DRIESSEN, Clemens; TURNHOUT, Esther (2018), “Managing wild minds: From control by numbers to a multinatural approach in wild boar management in the Veluwe, the Netherlands”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, v. 44, n. 1, pp. 2-15 [Consult. 19-06-2022]. Disponível em https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/tran.12269

BRAUN, Bruce (2008), “Environmental issues: inventive life”. Progress in Human Geography, v. 32, n. 5, pp. 667-679 [Consult. 14-06-2022].

Disponível: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.455.4704&rep=rep1&type=pdf

BULLER, Henry (2008), “Safe from the wolf: biosecurity, biodiversity, and competing philosophies of nature”. Environment and Planning A, v. 40, n. 7, pp. 1583-1597 [Consult. 23-06-2022]. Disponível em https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a4055

DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Felix (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press.

ELLIOTT, Denielle; CULHANE Dara, (2016), A Different Kind of Ethnography: Imaginative Practices and Creative Methodologies. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

ELLIS, Rebecca (2021), Sensuous and spatial multispecies ethnography as a vehicle to the re-enchantment of everyday life: A case study of knowing bees. in: A. Hovorka, Alice et al. (eds.), A Research Agenda for Animal Geographies. Massachusetts, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 87-100.

FARINA, Almo (2021), Semiotic landscape ecology: A novel approach to reconcile environment and humanities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

FARINA, Almo; ELDRIDGE, Alice; LI, Peng (2021), “Ecoacoustics and multispecies semiosis: Naming, semantics, semiotic characteristics, and competencies”. Biosemiotics, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 141-165 [Consult. 11-06-2022]. Disponível em https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-021-09402-6

FIJN, Natasha (2021), “Donald Thomson: Observations of Animal Connections in Visual Ethnography in Northern Australia”. Ethnos, v. 86, n. 1, pp. 44-68 [Consult. 17-06-2022]. Disponível em https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00141844.2019.1606024?journalCode=retn20

FULLAGAR, Simone (2000), “Desiring nature: Identity and becoming in narratives of travel”. Journal for Cultural Research, v. 4, n. 1, pp. 58-76 [Consult. 22-06-2022]. Disponível em https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261647886_Desiring_nature_Identity_and_becoming_in_narratives_of_travel

HAUPTMAN, Jodi (2005), Beyond the visible: the art of Odilon Redon. New York, The Museum of Modern Art.

HEAD, Lesley (2016), Hope and grief in the Anthropocene: Re-conceptualising human–nature relations. New York, Routledge Press.

HINCHLIFFE, Steven (2007), Geographies of Nature: Societies, Environments, Ecologies. London: SAGE.

HINCHLIFFE, Steven; WHATMORE, Sarah (2006), “Living Cities: Towards a Politics of Conviviality”. Science as Culture, v. 15, n. 2, pp. 123-38 [Consult. 09-06-2022]. Disponível em https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315256351-24/living-cities-towards-politics-conviviality-steve-hinchliffe-sarah-whatmore

HODGETTS, Timothy; LORIMER, Jamie (2020), “Animals’ mobilities”. Progress in Human Geography, v. 44, n. 1, pp. 4-26 [Consult. 24-06-2022].

Disponível em https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309132518817829

HOWES, David (2019), “Multisensory anthropology”. Annual Review of Anthropology, v. 48, pp. 17-28 [Consult. 21-06-2022]. Disponível em https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011324

INGOLD, Tim (2013), “Prospect”. in: T. INGOLD, Tim; and G. Palsson (eds.) Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-21.

KIRKSEY, S. Eben; HELMREICH, Stefan (2010), “The emergence of multispecies ethnography”. Cultural anthropology, v. 25, n. 4, pp. 545-576 [Consult. 05-06-2022]. Disponível em https://anthropology.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/helmreich_multispecies_ethnography.pdf

LATOUR, Bruno (2004), “How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies”. Body & Society, v. 10, pp. 205–229 [Consult. 07-06-2022]. Disponível em http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/77-BODY-NORMATIVE-BS-GB.pdf

LORIMER, Jamie (2010), “Moving image methodologies for more than-human geographies”. Cultural Geographies, v. 17, n. 2, pp. 237–258 [Consult. 19-06-2022]. Disponível em https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1474474010363853

LORIMER, Jamie (2015), Wildlife in the Anthropocene: conservation after nature. USA, U of Minnesota Press.

NIEHAUS, Carmen et al, (2011), “Presencia de protozoarios y microorganismos relacionados con procesos de inmunosupresión humana en coyotes (Canis Latrans: Canidae) del Parque Nacional Volcán Irazú y campo agrícola limítrofe en Costa Rica”. Revista Ibero-latinoamericana de Parasitología, v. 70, n. 2, pp. 197-205.

PERLOFF, Nancy Lynn (1995), “Gauguin's French baggage: decadence and colonialism in Tahiti”. in: E. BARKAN and R. BUSH, Ronald (eds.) Prehistories of the future: the primitivist project and the culture of modernism. California, Stanford University Press, pp. 226-269.

PINK, Sarah (2009), Doing Sensory Ethnography. London, Sage.

ROSENZWEIG, Michael (2003), Win-Win Ecology: How the Earth’s Species Can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

VAN DOOREN, Thom; BIRD ROSE, Deborah (2012), "Storied-places in a multispecies city." Humanimalia v. 3, n. 2, pp. 1-27. [Consult. 11-06-2022]. Disponível em https://humanimalia.org/article/view/10046

WHATMORE, Sarah (2002), Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. California, Sage.

WILSON, Helen F, (2019) “Animal Encounters: a genre of contact”. in A. BÖHM and J. ULLRICH (eds.) Animal Encounters, Cultural Animal Studies 4. Germany, Stuttgart J.B. Metzler, pp. 25-41.

Publicado

26-12-2022

Cómo citar

Arias, L. M. B. (2022). Paisajes crepusculares: repensando las relaciones humanos- coyotes a partir de la niebla en el contexto de una comunidad rural en Costa Rica. Simbiótica. Revista Eletrônica, 9(3), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v9i3.39804

Número

Sección

Artigo