Refractory diseases and the, “opacity of the right to health”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18315/argumentum.v12i2.22448Abstract
Although public health has been enshrined as a fundamental right since 1988, there are signs, in Brazil, of a mismatch between the deontic and ontic worlds regarding the subject in question; and one of the reasons are the historical, semantic and minority-related vulnerabilities. This article problematizes the statement of article 196 of the Constitution, seeking to incite reflection on the reasons for its non-implementation. The working hypothesis is that the idea of traditional equality hinders the realization of minority rights. It is bibliographic research, using an argumentative method. The working hypothesis is confirmed as striving for a new meaning of public health.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Agreement
As a condition for submission, the authors must agree with the Copyright Transfer Agreement, by checking the box after reading the clauses.
The author(s) (hereinafter "AUTHOR") hereby agrees to transfer, without any financial compensation, the property of copyrights regarding Argumentum, a journal of the Postgraduate Program in Social Politics (Programa de Pós-graduação em Política Social), Federal University of Espírito Santo (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo) - Av. Fernando Ferrari, 514 - Goiabeiras 29075-910, Vitória (Brazil), (hereinafter "ARGUMENTUM"), according to the following terms and conditions:
1. I am aware of the terms of "Care Ethics Research Guide" described in the Policies section.
2. AUTHOR warrants to be the writer and copyright holder of the WORK submitted.
3. AUTHOR declares that the WORK does not infringe the rights of third-parties; that the distribution of images (if existent) was authorized; and that AUTHOR assumes total moral and property responsibility for their content.
4. AUTHOR agrees to transfer all the copyrights concerning the WORK to ARGUMENTUM, especially the rights to edit, publish, translate into another language, and reproduce it through any process or technique. ARGUMENTUM becomes the exclusive owner of the rights regarding the WORK, and any total or partial reproduction, in any other medium, printed or electronic, is strictly forbidden without prior written consent by ARGUMENTUM.
5. The copyright transfer is unpaid and, therefore, there will be no monetary compensation whatsoever by ARGUMENTUM in order to use the TEXT.
