Refractory diseases and the, “opacity of the right to health”

Authors

  • Cândice Lisbôa Alves Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • José Renato Venâncio Resende Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18315/argumentum.v12i2.22448

Abstract

Although public health has been enshrined as a fundamental right since 1988, there are signs, in Brazil, of a mismatch between the deontic and ontic worlds regarding the subject in question; and one of the reasons are the historical, semantic and minority-related vulnerabilities. This article problematizes the statement of article 196 of the Constitution, seeking to incite reflection on the reasons for its non-implementation. The working hypothesis is that the idea of ​​traditional equality hinders the realization of minority rights. It is bibliographic research, using an argumentative method. The working hypothesis is confirmed as striving for a new meaning of public health.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Cândice Lisbôa Alves, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Professora de Direito Constitucional da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Doutora em Direito pela PUC-Minas. Mestre em Extensão Rural pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

Published

29-08-2020

How to Cite

Alves, C. L., & Resende, J. R. V. (2020). Refractory diseases and the, “opacity of the right to health”. Argumentum, 12(2), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.18315/argumentum.v12i2.22448