Análise de eficiência do desenvolvimento sustentável do brasil e dos países da OCDE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v7i5.36133Palavras-chave:
Indicadores de sustentabilidade, DEA, Desenvolvimento sustentável, OCDE, BrasilResumo
O desenvolvimento de um país não está relacionado apenas ao seu crescimento econômico, uma vez que seu desenvolvimento sustentável deve considerar aspectos sociais, econômicos e ambientais. Este trabalho pretende medir e analisar a eficiência do Brasil e dos países da OCDE (Organização para o Desenvolvimento Econômico e de Cooperação) sob o ponto de vista do desenvolvimento sustentável, visto a atual ambição do Brasil em compor a OCDE. Esta análise utilizou um método de programação matemática denominado Análise Envoltória de Dados (DEA), que permitiu, a partir do modelo SBM e da análise de janelas, avaliar a capacidade dos países de reduzir os inputs (emissão de CO2, consumo de energia, taxa de desemprego e índice de Gini), bem como aumentar os outputs (expectativa de vida, PIB, energia sustentável, saneamento básico). A comparação entre os países foi feita a partir do ranking de eficiência sustentável e os resultados deste estudo indicaram que a Letônia e o Chile são os mais eficientes; e em quarto lugar está o Brasil. Além disso, foram analisadas as folgas relativas e concluiu-se que, embora o Brasil não seja benchmark em nenhuma variável, suas folgas são relativamente baixas. Ressalta-se que o índice medido é importante para contribuir nas discussões relacionadas à avaliação da sustentabilidade dos países, ajudando a identificar aqueles com as melhores práticas no que diz respeito a aspectos sociais, econômicos e ambientais; e orientar as decisões políticas relativas aos incentivos governamentais para promover o desenvolvimento dos países em busca de uma produção mais sustentável.
Downloads
Referências
Agenda 21 Global (1992). Integração entre meio ambiente e desenvolvimento na tomada de decisões. p.4. Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved from http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/agenda21/_arquivos/cap08.pdf
Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy. 38, 656-660, ISSN 0301-4215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.002
Arndt, C., Arent, D., Hartley, F., Merven, B., & Mondal, A. H. (2019). Faster Than You Think: Renewable Energy and Developing Countries Annual Review of Resource Economics. 11(1), 149-168. Retrieved from https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093759
Azar, C., Holmberg, J., & Lindgre, K. (1996) Social-ecological indicators for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 18, 89-11.
BNEF. (2015). Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2015. Frankfurt am Main: Bloomberg New Energy Finance/Frankfurt School/UNEP Centre.
Bossel, H. (1997). Deriving indicators of sustainable development. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 1, 193-218.
Camioto, F. C., Mariano, E. B., Santana, N. B., Yamashita, B. D., & Rebelatto, D. A. (2018). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Efficiency: An Analysis of Latin American Countries. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 37(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12877
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M. (1994). Date Envelopment Analysis. Theory, Methodology and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
Coelli, T. J. et al. (2005). An Introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Ed. 2.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references. Springer Science & Business Media.
Dhahri, S., & Omri, A. (2018). Entrepreneurship contribution to the three pillars of sustainable development: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 106, 64-77.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of Twenty-First Century Business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.
Endenhofer, O. et al. (2008). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. United Kingdom/ New York.
Gaspar, J. S., Marques, A. C., & Fuinhas, J. A. (2017) The traditional energy-growth nexus: A comparison between sustainable development and economic growth approaches. Ecological Indicators, 75, 286-296.
Jabbour, C. J. C., & Santos, F.C.A. (2009) Sob os ventos da mudança climática: desafios, oportunidades e o papel da função produção no contexto do aquecimento global. Gest. Prod., 6(1), 111-120.
Luukkanen, J. et al. (2019). Green economic development in Lao PDR: A Sustainability Window analysis of Green Growth Productivity and the Efficiency Gap, Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 818-829.
Megyesiova, S, & Lieskovska, V. (2018). Analysis of the Sustainable Development Indicators in the OECD Countries. Sustainability, 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124554
Minh, H., V., & Nguyen-Viet, H. (2011). Economic Aspects of Sanitation in Developing Countries. Environmental Health Insights. 5, 63-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.4137%2FEHI.S8199
Nações Unidas no Brasil. (2015). Transformando Nosso Mundo: A Agenda 2030 para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Retrieved from https://nacoesunidas.org/pos2015/agenda2030/
OECD. (2006). Good Practices in the National Development Sustainable Development Strategies of OECD countries. Paris. http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/36655769.pdf
OECD. (2018). OECD Economic Surveys: Chile 2018, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eco_serveys-chl-2018-en
OECD. (2019). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Latvia 2019, OECD Environmental Performance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/2cb03cdd-en
OECD. (2018). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Brazil 2018, OECD Environmental Performance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/2cb03cdd-en
OECD. (2016). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Chile 2016, OECD Environmental Performance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264252615-en
Penedo, A. S. T., et al. (2016). International socio-environmental conferences and agreements: a thematic review. Revista em Agronegócio e Meio Ambiente, Maringá, 9(3).
Rashidi, K., Shabani, A., & Saen, R. F. (2015). Using data envelopment analysis for estimating energy saving and undesirable output abatement: a case study in the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 105, 441- 252.
Santana, N. B., Mariano, E. B., Camioto, F. C., & Rebelatto, D. A. N. (2015). National innovative capacity as determinant in sustainable development: a comparison between the BRICS and G7 countries. Int. J. Innovation and Sustainable Development. 9 (3-4).
Sebastian, J., & Sebastian, W. (2016). Financial development and income inequality: a panel data approach. Empirical Economics, 51, 291-314.
Shafiei, S., & Salim, R. (2014). Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Energy Policy. 6, 547-556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064
Shen, Z., Boussemart, J., & Leleu, H. (2017). Aggregate green productivity growth in OECD’s countries. Int. J. Production Economics. 189, 30-39.
Song, M. L., Zhang, L. L., Liu, W., & Fisher, R. (2013). Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS' energy efficiency based on small sample data. Appl. Energy. 112, 1049-1055
Sustainable Development. (2015). The 17 sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
Szopik, K. et al. (2018). The study of relationship in a hierarchical structure of EU sustainable development indicators. Ecological Indicators, 90, 120-131.
Thévenot, C. (2017). Inequality in OECD countries. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 45, 9-16. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/action/doSearch?target=default&ContribAuthorStored=Th%C3%A9venot%2C+Celine
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498-509.
Tuon, L. (2020). O que falta para o Brasil entrar nos padrões da OCDE, o “clube dos ricos”. Exame. 18 jan. 2020. Retrieved from https://exame.abril.com.br/economia/o-que-falta-para-o-brasil-entrar-nos-padroes-da-ocde-o-clube-dos-ricos/
UN General Assembly. (2005). World Summit Outcome: resolution / adopted by the General Assembly. A/RES/60/1, 2005. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/44168a910.html
United Nations. (1987). Our common future: World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
United Nations. (2012). The future we want: Outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. Rio de janeiro. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/733FutureWeWant.pdf
Van Bellen, H. M. (2002). Indicadores de Sustentabilidade: Uma Análise Comparativa. 2002. 235f. Tese de Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.
Wang, K., Lu, B., & Wey, Y.M. (2013). China's regional energy and environmental efficiency: arrange-adjusted measure-based analysis. Applied Energy. 112, 1403-1415. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.apenergy.2013.04.021
Wang, Y. M, & Chin, K. S. (2010). Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Int. J. Production Economics. 128, 332- 338.
Wilson, J. P. (2014). The triple bottom line Undertaking an economic, social, and environmental retail sustainability strategy. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 45(4/5), 432-447.
World Bank. (2020). World Development Indicators. 2020. Retrieved from http://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/
Xie, B, C., Bai, C., Shang, L.-F., Yang, S.-B., & Yi, B. W. (2014). Dynamic environmental efficiencyevaluation of electric power industries: evidence from OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries. Energy, 74, 147–157.
Zafar, M, W., Shabaz, M., Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Qin, Q. (2020). How renewable Energy Consumption Contribute to Environmental Quality? The Role of Education in OECD Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 268, 2020.
Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2018). Date envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research. 264, 1-16.
Zhou, P., Ang, B. W. (2008). Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy. 36, 2911-2916.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering - BJPE
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Atribuição 4.0 internacional CC BY 4.0 Deed
Esta licença permite que outros remixem, adaptem e desenvolvam seu trabalho não comercialmente, contanto que eles creditem a você e licenciem suas novas criações sob os mesmos termos.
