Life cycle assessment of freight railroads: a critical analysis and guideline proposal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v10i2.44372Palavras-chave:
life cycle assessment, LCA, freight railroads, guidelinesResumo
This study conducts a review of several articles inside the context of railroads, where the life cycle assessment methodology (LCA) is applied. Using the ProKnow-C methodology, seven review and 85 original papers applying the LCA methodology to railroads are analyzed, and several important gaps were identified, mainly concerning the lack of disclosure of information about parameters, software and other important decisions made during the works that would allow other researchers to replicate the results in order to compare them to other railroads or different circumstances. Currently, there are no ISO standards addressing the LCA of railroads, so this work seeks to provide an initial set of guidelines facilitating the elaboration of such a norm and providing support and direction for researchers in the field.
Downloads
Referências
Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Association of American Railroads. (2023). Association of American Railroads. Freight rail & climate change 2023 Retrieved from https://www.aar.org/issue/freight-rail-climate-change/
Baitz, M., Albrecht, S., Brauner, E., Broadbent, C., Castellan, G., Conrath, P., & Fullana Palmer, P. (2013). LCA’s theory and practice: like ebony and ivory living in perfect harmony? In (Vol. 18, pp. 5-13): Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0476-x
Brander, M. & Wylie, C. (2011). The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, 1(3-4), 161-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2011.637670
Diaz, M. A. H., Scouse, A., & Kelley, S. S. (2022). Environmental full cost accounting of alternative materials used for railroad ties: Treated-wood and concrete case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132536
Dincer, I. & Zamfirescu, C. (2016). A review of novel energy options for clean rail applications. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 28, 461-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.007
Du, G. & Karoumi, R. (2014). Life cycle assessment framework for railway bridges: literature survey and critical issues. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(3), 277-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.749289
Earles, J. M. & Halog, A. (2011). Consequential life cycle assessment: a review. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 16, 445-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0275-9
Edelen, A. & Ingwersen, W. W. (2018). The creation, management, and use of data quality information for life cycle assessment. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 23, 759-772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1348-1
Ekvall, T. & Finnveden, G. (2001). Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(3), 197-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00052-4
Ekvall, T. & Weidema, B. P. (2004). System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 9, 161-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994190
Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., Lacerda, R. T. d. O., & Tasca, J. E. (2010). ProKnow-C, Knowledge Development Process–Constructivist: processo técnico com patente de registro pendente junto ao INPI. Brasil:[sn].
Fridell, E., Bäckström, S., & Stripple, H. (2019). Considering infrastructure when calculating emissions for freight transportation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 69, 346-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.013
ISO. (2006a). 14040. Environmental management—life cycle assessment - principles and framework.
ISO. (2006b). 14044. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines.
ISO. (2014). 13315-2. Environmental management for concrete and concrete structures. Part 2: System boundary and inventory data
ISO. (2020). 22888. Railway applications — Concepts and basic requirements for the planning of railway operation in the event of earthquakes.
ISO. (2022). 23054-1. Railway applications — Track geometry quality. Part 1: Characterization of track geometry and track geometry quality.
ISO. (2024). 13315-1. Environmental management for concrete and concrete structures. Part 1: General principles.
Jiang, C., Wan, Y., Yang, H., & Zhang, A. (2021). Impacts of high-speed rail projects on CO2 emissions due to modal interactions: A review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 100, 103081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103081
Olugbenga, O., Kalyviotis, N., & Saxe, S. (2019). Embodied emissions in rail infrastructure: a critical literature review. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 123002.
Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. (2015). Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics, 105, 2109-2135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x
Olugbenga, O., Kalyviotis, N., & Saxe, S. (2019). Embodied emissions in rail infrastructure: a critical literature review. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 123002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab442f
Rebello, T. A., Roque, R. P., Gonçalves, R. F., Calmon, J. L., & Queiroz, L. M. (2021). Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater treatment plants: a critical analysis and guideline proposal. Water Science and Technology, 83(3), 501-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.608
Scopus (2023). http://www..scopus.com
Trevisan, L. & Bordignon, M. (2020). Screening Life Cycle Assessment to compare CO2 and Greenhouse Gases emissions of air, road, and rail transport: An exploratory study. Procedia CIRP, 90, 303-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.100
Vaz, C. R., Tasca, J. E., Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., & Selig, P. M. (2012). Avaliação de desempenho na gestão estratégica organizacional: seleção de um referencial teórico de pesquisa e análise bibliométrica. Revista Gestão Industrial, 8(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3895/S1808-04482012000400008
Vieira, D. R., Calmon, J. L., & Coelho, F. Z. (2016). Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 656-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.125
Weidema, B. P., Pizzol, M., Schmidt, J., & Thoma, G. (2018). Attributional or consequential life cycle assessment: a matter of social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 305-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.340
Xiao, X., Cai, D., Lou, L., Shi, Y., & Xiao, F. (2021). Application of asphalt-based materials in railway systems: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 304, 124630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124630
Web of Science (2023). http://www.webofscience.com
Zang, Y., Li, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, W., & Xiong, W. (2015). Towards more accurate life cycle assessment of biological wastewater treatment plants: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 676-692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.060

Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Atribuição 4.0 internacional CC BY 4.0 Deed
Esta licença permite que outros remixem, adaptem e desenvolvam seu trabalho não comercialmente, contanto que eles creditem a você e licenciem suas novas criações sob os mesmos termos.