Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7147/GEO27.22001Keywords:
agglomeration theory, assemblage theory, planetary urbanisation theory, post-colonial urbanism, urban theoryAbstract
Urban studies today is marked by many active debates. In an earlier paper, we addressed some of these debates by proposing a foundational concept of urbanisation and urban form as a way of identifying a common language for urban research. In the present paper we provide a brief recapitulation of that framework. We then use this preliminary material as background to a critique of three currently influential versions of urban analysis, namely, postcolonial urban theory, assemblage theoretic approaches and planetary urbanism. We evaluate each of these versions in turn and find them seriously wanting as statements about urban realities.We criticise (a) postcolonial urban theory for its particularism and its insistence on the provincialisation of knowledge, (b) assemblage theoretic approaches for their indeterminacy and eclecticism and (c) planetary urbanism for its radical devaluation of the forces of agglomeration and nodality in urban-economic geography.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyrights Declaration
Authors who publish in the journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors will keep their copyrights and grant the journal the right to their first publishing, simultaneously licenced under Creative Commons Attribution License which allows sharing their work with authorship recognition and initial release through this journal.
- Authors may sign additional contracts separately diffusing a non-exclusively version of the paper published in this journal (i.g. publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), once citing the authorship and initial release through this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to publicize and diffuse their paper online, for example onto institutional repositories or on their personal websites.