Mathematical Modeling of Geological CO₂ Storage: Analysis of the Incorporation of the Hysteresis Effect in Relative Permeability Equations and Capillary Pressure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21712/lajer.2025.v12.n3.p10-19Keywords:
carbon dioxide; carbon storage; capillary trapping; hysteresis; numerical modelingAbstract
Geological CO₂ storage is one of the main strategies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. This study analyzes the effect of hysteresis on capillary pressure (Pc) and relative permeability (kr) curves, which are fundamental for understanding the multiphase behavior of CO₂ in porous media. Based on the Brooks–Corey (1964) and Killough (1976) models, and recent literature data, it was observed that considering hysteresis significantly alters the Pc and kr curves, increasing capillary and residual trapping while reducing CO₂ mobility. The results indicate that hysteretic models provide more realistic and reliable predictions regarding the efficiency and stability of geological carbon storage, especially in gas injection cycles.
Downloads
References
Ajayi, T, Gomes, JS and Bera, A (2019) ‘CO₂ capture and storage: A review of the recent advances’, Petroleum Science, p. 915–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-0340-8
Bahrami, M, Mahani, H, Zivar, D and Ayatollahi, S (2024) ‘Microfluidic investigation of pore-scale flow behavior and hysteresis in underground hydrogen storage in sandstones’, Journal of Energy Storage, v. 98, 112959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.112959
Brooks, RH and Corey, AT (1964) ‘Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media’. Colorado State University, Hydrology Papers, n. 3.
Corey, AT (1954) ‘The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities’, Producers Monthly, v. 19, p. 38–41.
Cui, G et al. (2024) ‘Migration characteristics and local capillary trapping mechanism after the CO₂ leakage out of saline aquifers’, Fuel, v. 356, 129347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129347
Dutta, R et al. (2024) ‘Evaluation of CO₂ EOR strategies for enhanced recovery and trapping efficiency in Upper Assam Basin, India’, Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02384
IEA – International Energy Agency (2025) ‘CCUS Projects Database’, Paris: IEA. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/ccus-projects-database
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005) ‘Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage’, Geneva: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/carbon-dioxide-capture-and-storage/
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022) ‘Sixth Assessment Report – Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability’. Geneva: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-ii/
Jin, L et al. (2018) ‘Effects of gas relative permeability hysteresis and solubility on associated CO₂ storage performance’, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 75, p. 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.06.002
Khanal, A and Khan, AI (2024) ‘Impact of relative permeability hysteresis and capillary pressure on CO₂ trapping mechanisms during CO₂ sequestration in saline aquifers’, Proceedings of the 2024 Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Conference. https://doi.org/10.15530/ccus-2024-4012176
Khoramian, R, Pourafshary, P and Riazi, M (2025) ‘The role of capillary hysteresis in enhancing CO₂ trapping efficiency and storage stability’, Kazakhstan Journal for Oil & Gas Industry, 7(1), p. 90–99. https://doi.org/10.54859/kjogi108781
Killough, JE (1976) ‘Reservoir simulation with history matching’, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, v. 25, p. 17–28.
Krevor, S et al. (2015) ‘Capillary trapping for geologic carbon dioxide storage – From pore-scale physics to field-scale implications’, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 40, p. 221–237.
Lan, T et al. (2024) ‘Impact of corner-bridge flow on capillary pressure curve: insights from microfluidic experiments and pore-network modeling’, Water Resources Research, 60(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037690
Mukherjee, S and Johns, RT (2025) ‘Modeling of relative permeability hysteresis using limited experimental data and physically constrained ANN’, Transport in Porous Media, v. 152, p. 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-025-02178-0
Sedaghati NR, Kord, S, Soleymanzadeh, A and Moghadasi, J (2021) ‘Relative permeability hysteresis and capillary trapping during CO₂ EOR and sequestration’, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 106, 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103262
Xi, J (2011) ‘A review of physical modelling and numerical simulation of long-term geological storage of CO₂’. Applied Energy, v. 88, p. 3557-3566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.004
Yang, Y et al. (2023) ‘Pore-scale numerical simulation of supercritical CO₂-brine two-phase flow based on VOF method’, Natural Gas Industry B, v. 10, p. 466–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2023.08.002
Zhang, H, Zhang, Y and Arif, M (2025) ‘CO₂ geological storage in subsurface aquifers as a function of brine salinity: a field-scale numerical investigation’, Geoenergy Science and Engineering, v. 245, 213505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213505
Zhong, J et al. (2024) ‘Injection depth and caprock integrity for long-term CO₂ storage in saline aquifers’, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 26, 100720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100720
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Latin American Journal of Energy Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
O autor, no ato da submissão do artigo, transfere o direito autoral ao periódico.

