Captura e armazenamento de carbono associados à recuperação avançada de óleo: uma revisão
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21712/lajer.2022.v9.n2.p18-35Palabras clave:
Captura e armazenamento de carbono, recuperação avançada de óleo, indústria petrolífera, CO2-EOR, CCS-EORResumen
Muito se discute a respeito da mitigação das mudanças climáticas em todo o mundo. No entanto, o fornecimento sustentável de energia e materiais ainda não é realidade, visto o crescimento acelerado da demanda energética, que intensifica consideravelmente a emissão de Gases de Efeito Estufa (GEE). Neste intuito, dentre as tecnologias que podem ser aliadas à redução da emissão de GEE tem-se a captura e armazenamento geológico de dióxido de carbono - CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage). Além de reduzir as emissões de GEE, um projeto de CCS pode ser aplicado na produção de petróleo para melhorar o desempenho de um poço no processo de Recuperação Avançada de Petróleo - EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery). O objetivo deste artigo é revisar os conceitos e tecnologias relacionados à Captura e Armazenamento de Carbono e à Recuperação Avançada de Petróleo, a partir de uma revisão sistemática da literatura, estruturando e classificando os artigos selecionados. Para isso, foi aplicada a técnica SYSMAP (Scientometric and Systematic Yielding Mapping Process) visando estruturar as principais etapas da revisão. Além disso, foi utilizado o método Science Mapping, para identificar os trabalhos de maior impacto na área de interesse, através do software R Studio, Bibliometrix e de Indicadores Internacionais propostos pela Capes. Evidenciou-se que a abordagem técnica foi a mais empregada, seguida da econômica e, por fim, a ambiental. Foram identificadas algumas limitações e propostas de estudos futuros. Desta forma, a contribuição deste artigo envolve identificar os estudos mais relevantes na área e, por meio da análise estruturada, apresentar o estado da arte orientando pesquisas futuras.
Descargas
Citas
Adu, E, Zhang, Y e Liu, D (2019) Current situation of carbon dioxide capture, storage, and enhanced oil recovery in the oil and gas industry. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering [online]. 97(5), 1048–1076. <https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23393>
Ağralı, S, Üçtuğ, FG e Türkmen, BA (2018) An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management [online]. 215, 305–315. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.054>
Bachu, S (2016) Identification of oil reservoirs suitable for CO2-EOR and CO2 storage (CCUS) using reserves databases, with application to Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 44, 152–165. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.11.013>
Barker, R, Hua, Y e Neville, A (2016) Internal corrosion of carbon steel pipelines for dense-phase CO2 transport in carbon capture and storage (CCS) – a review. International Materials Reviews [online]. 62(1), 1–31. <https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2016.1176306>
Bender, S e Akin, S (2017) Flue gas injection for EOR and sequestration: case study. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering [online]. 157, 1033–1045. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.07.044>
Cho, J, Min, B, Kwon, S, Park, G e Lee, KS (2021) Compositional modeling with formation damage to investigate the effects of CO2–CH4 water alternating gas (WAG) on performance of coupled enhanced oil recovery and geological carbon storage. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering [online]. 205, 108795. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108795>
Cormos, C-C (2009) Assessment of hydrogen and electricity co-production schemes based on gasification process with carbon capture and storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy [online]. 34(15), 6065–6077. <http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.054>
Cormos, C-C (2010) Evaluation of iron based chemical looping for hydrogen and electricity co-production by gasification process with carbon capture and storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy [online]. 35(6), 2278–2289. <http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.033>
da Silva, FTF, Carvalho, FM, Corrêa, JLG, Merschmann, PRdC, Tagomori, IS, Szklo, A e Schaeffer, R (2018) CO2 capture in ethanol distilleries in Brazil: Designing the optimum carbon transportation network by integrating hubs, pipelines and trucks. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 71, 168–183. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.02.018>
de Coninck, H e Benson, SM (2014) Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Issues and Prospects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources [online]. 39(1), 243–270. <10.1146/annurev-environ-032112-095222>
Dai, Z, Viswanathan, H, Middleton, R, Pan, F, Ampomah, W, Yang, C, Jia, W, Xiao, T, Lee, S-Y, McPherson, B, Balch, R, Grigg, R e White, M (2016) CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites. Environmental Science & Technology [online]. 50(14), 7546–7554. <https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01744>
Drexler, S, Hoerlle, F, Godoy, W, Boyd, A e Couto, P (2020) Wettability Alteration by Carbonated Brine Injection and Its Impact on Pore-Scale Multiphase Flow for Carbon Capture and Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in a Carbonate Reservoir. Applied Sciences [online]. 10(18), 6496. <https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186496>
Egger, M, Smith, GD e O'Rourke, K (2001) Introduction: Rationale, Potentials, and Promise of Systematic Reviews. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care [online]. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group. pp. 1–19. <10.1002/9780470693926.ch1>
Fan, J-L, Wei, S, Shen, S, Xu, M e Zhang, X (2021) Geological storage potential of CO2 emissions for China’s coal-fired power plants: A city-level analysis. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 106, 103278. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103278>
Farajzadeh, R, Eftekhari, AA, Dafnomilis, G, Lake, LW e Bruining, J (2020) On the sustainability of CO2 storage through CO2 – Enhanced oil recovery. Applied Energy [online]. 261, 114467. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114467>
Garfield, E (2003) The meaning of the Impact Factor. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology [online]. 3(2), 363–369. <http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33730210>
Godec, ML, Kuuskraa, VA e Dipietro, P (2013) Opportunities for Using Anthropogenic CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage. Energy & Fuels [online]. 27(8), 4183–4189. <https://doi.org/ 10.1021/ef302040u>
González-Díaz, A, González-Díaz, MO, Alcaráz-Calderón, AM, Gibbins, J e Lucquiaud, M (2017) Priority projects for the implementation of CCS power generation with enhanced oil recovery in Mexico. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 64, 119–125. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.07.006>
Guo, J.-X, Huang, C., Wang, J-L e Meng, X-Y (2020) Integrated operation for the planning of CO2 capture path in CCS–EOR project. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering [online]. 186, 106720. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106720>
Hammond, GP, Akwe, SSO e Williams, S (2011) Techno-economic appraisal of fossil-fuelled power generation systems with carbon dioxide capture and storage. Energy [online]. 36(2), 975–984. <https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.012>
Hu, B e Zhai, H (2017) The cost of carbon capture and storage for coal-fired power plants in China. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 65, 23–31. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.08.009>
Jesson, J, Matheson, L e M Lacey, F (2011) Doing Your Literature Review Traditional And Systematic Techniques. Sage Publications (CA).
Jiang, Y, Lei, Y, Yang, Y e Wang, F (2018) Life Cycle CO2 Emission Estimation of CCS-EOR System Using Different CO2 Sources. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies [online]. 27(6), 2573–2583. <https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/80897>
Katz, JS e Martin, BR (1997) What is research collaboration? Research Policy [online]. 26(1), 1–18. <10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00917-1>
Kolster, C, Masnadi, MS, Krevor, S, Mac Dowell, N e Brandt, AR (2017) CO2 enhanced oil recovery: a catalyst for gigatonne-scale carbon capture and storage deployment? Energy & Environmental Science [online]. 10(12), 2594–2608. <https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee02102j>
Kumar, A (2018) Is “Impact” the “Factor” that matters…? (Part I). Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology [online]. 22(2), 95. <10.4103/jisp.jisp_195_18>
Observatório do Clima (2021) Análise das emissões brasileiras de Gases de Efeito Estufa e suas implicações para as metas climáticas no Brasil SEEG 9 [online]. Disponível em: https://seeg-br.s3.amazonaws.com/Documentos%20Analiticos/SEEG_9/OC_03_relatorio_2021_FINAL.pdf
Pagani, RN, Kovaleski, JL e Resende, LM (2015) Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics [online]. 105(3), 2109–2135. <10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x>
Peck, WD, Azzolina, NA, Ge, J, Bosshart, NW, Burton-Kelly, ME, Gorecki, CD, Gorz, AJ, Ayash, SC, Nakles, DV e Melzer, LS (2018) Quantifying CO2 storage efficiency factors in hydrocarbon reservoirs: A detailed look at CO2 enhanced oil recovery. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 69, 41–51. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.005>
Pepinsky, TB (2019) The Return of the Single-Country Study. Annual Review of Political Science [online]. 22(1), 187–203. <10.1146/annurev-polisci-051017-113314>
Pires, JCM, Martins, FG, Alvim-Ferraz, MCM e Simões, M (2011) Recent developments on carbon capture and storage: An overview. Chemical Engineering Research and Design [online]. 89(9), 1446–1460. <10.1016/j.cherd.2011.01.028>
Pollak, M, Phillips, SJ e Vajjhala, S (2011) Carbon capture and storage policy in the United States: A new coalition endeavors to change existing policy. Global Environmental Change [online]. 21(2), 313–323. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.009>
Roefs, P, Moretti, M, Welkenhuysen, K, Piessens, K e Compernolle, T (2019) CO2-enhanced oil recovery and CO2 capture and storage: An environmental economic trade-off analysis. Journal of Environmental Management [online]. 239, 167–177. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.007>
Sahin, S, Kalfa, U e Celebioglu, D (2012) Unique CO2-Injection Experience in the Bati Raman Field May Lead to a Proposal of EOR/Sequestration CO2 Network in the Middle East. SPE Economics & Management [online]. 4(01), 42–50. <https://doi.org/10.2118/139616-pa>
Santos, R, Sgouridis, S e Alhajaj, A (2021) Potential of CO2-enhanced oil recovery coupled with carbon capture and storage in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in the UAE. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 111, 103485. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103485>
Stork, AL, Verdon, JP e Kendall, JM (2015) The microseismic response at the In Salah Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 32, 159–171. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.11.014>
Tapia, JFD, Lee, J-Y, Ooi, REH, Foo, DCY e Tan, RR (2015) Design and Scheduling of CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery with Geological Sequestration Operations as a Strip Packing Problem. Chemical Engineering Transactions [online]. 45, 1615–1620. <https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1545270>
Tapia, JFD, Lee, J-Y., Ooi, REH, Foo, DCY e Tan, RR (2016) Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations. Applied Energy [online]. 184, 337–345. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.093>
Thorne, RJ, Sundseth, K, Bouman, E, Czarnowska, L, Mathisen, A, Skagestad, R, Stanek, W, Pacyna, JM e Pacyna, EG (2020) Technical and environmental viability of a European CO2 EOR system. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 92, 102857. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102857>
Turk, JK, Reay, DS e Haszeldine, RS (2018) UK grid electricity carbon intensity can be reduced by enhanced oil recovery with CO2 sequestration. Carbon Management [online]. 9(2), 115–126. <https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1435959>
Tyne, RL, Barry, PH, Lawson, M, Byrne, DJ, Warr, O, Xie, H, Hillegonds, DJ, Formolo, M, Summers, ZM, Skinner, B, Eiler, JM e Ballentine, CJ (2021) Rapid microbial methanogenesis during CO2 storage in hydrocarbon reservoirs. Nature [online]. 600(7890), 670–674. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04153-3>
van Alphen, K, van Ruijven, J, Kasa, S, Hekkert, M e Turkenburg, W (2009) The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system. Energy Policy [online]. 37(1), 43–55. <https://doi.org/:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.029>
Vaz, C e Maldonado, M (2017) Revisão de literatura estruturada: proposta do modelo SYSMAP (Scientometric and sYStematic yielding Mapping Process. 9 de setembro. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Caroline-Vaz-3/publication/319533945_Revisao_de_Literatura_Estruturada_proposta_do_modelo_SYSMAP_Scientometric_and_Systematic_yielding_Mapping_Process/links/59b466060f7e9b3743523fa6/Revisao-de-Literatura-Estruturada-proposta-do-modelo-SYSMAP-Scientometric-and-Systematic-yielding-Mapping-Process.pdf
Yáñez, E, Ramírez, A, Núñez-López, V, Castillo, E e Faaij, A (2020) Exploring the potential of carbon capture and storage-enhanced oil recovery as a mitigation strategy in the Colombian oil industry. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control [online]. 94, 102938. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102938>
Zhu, L, Yao, X e Zhang, X (2020) Evaluation of cooperative mitigation: captured carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change [online]. 25(7), 1261–1285. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09906-0>
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Latin American Journal of Energy Research
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
O autor, no ato da submissão do artigo, transfere o direito autoral ao periódico.
