ST&I dynamics via academic spin-off
evidence of the systemic functional structure of the innovation process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/regec.2317-5087.2022.11.3.37209.8-31Keywords:
Academic spin-off, Technological innovations, National Innovation SystemAbstract
The present research highlights the ST&I dynamics established by an academic spin-off linked to a Brazilian public university, so as to analyze the functional structure of the national innovation system. The objective of the investigation was to identify components, interactions and functions that configured the ST&I dynamics, so as to enable the development of a new technology as an expression of a technological paradigm shift. The study was constituted under a qualitative approach, operationalized through semi-structured interviews, treated based on content analysis. The articulation of different players and competencies was verified to enable the development of the new technology and its transfer to the market. Among these actors, five main domains were identified: University, Development Agencies, Political Actors, Facilitators, and Market. Certain functions, such as Regulation, Support, Infrastructure, Financing and Commercialization, were manifested as key to the generation of innovation.
Downloads
References
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2017). National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 997-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8
Adegbile, A. S., Sarpong, D., & Kolade, O. (2021). Environments for Joint University-Industry Laboratories (JUIL): Micro-level dimensions and research implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120888
Alves, R. F. (2021). Atlas do agronegócio: fatos e números sobre as corporações que controlam o que comemos. Revista Verde Grande: Geografia e Interdisciplinaridade, 3(1), 222-227. https://doi.org/10.46551/rvg2675239520211222227
Audy, J. (2017). A inovação, o desenvolvimento e o papel da Universidade. Estudos Avançados, 31(90), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.3190005
Bekkers, R., Gilsing, V., & Steen, M. (2006). Determining Factors of the Effectiveness of IP-based Spin-offs: Comparing the Netherlands and the US. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 545-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9058-z
Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E., & García, J. L. S. (2015). Can a magic recipe foster university spin-off creation? Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2272-2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.010
Bourguinat, H. (1999). Finance internationale. (4éd. revue et corrige). Presses Universitaires de France.
Brasil. (2016). Estratégia Nacional de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação 2016 – 2022. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações. http://www.finep.gov.br/images/a-finep/Politica/16_03_2018_Estrategia_Nacional_de_Ciencia_Tecnologia_e_Inovacao_2016_2022.pdf?adlt=strict&toWww=1&redig=848FB0BE003845F79D17518F09E457A9
Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 93-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01224915
Chiesa, V., & Piccaluga, A. (2000). Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin‐off companies in Italy. R&D Management, 30(4), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00187
Decreto nº 4.074, de 4 de janeiro de 2002. (2002, 4 de janeiro). Regulamenta a Lei no 7.802, de 11 de julho de 1989, que dispõe sobre entre outros aspectos o registro, a classificação, o controle, a inspeção e a fiscalização de agrotóxicos, seus componentes e afins, e dá outras providências. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/2002/d4074.htm?adlt=strict&toWww=1&redig=9A0337E5F675489D9DFAE28F53938822.
Dosi, G. (1988). The nature of the innovative process. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.). Technical Change and Economic Theory. (Chap. 10, pp. 221-238). Pinter Publishers.
Edquist, C. (Ed.) (1997). Systems of innovation approaches–their emergence and characteristics. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, (Chap. Introduction, pp. 1-35). Pinter Publisher.
Edquist, C. (2001, june 12-13). The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art. [Lead paper presented] DRUID's Nelson and Winter Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.
Fagerberg, J., Lundvall, B. Å., & Srholec, M. (2018). Global value chains, national innovation systems and economic development. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(3), 533-556. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0147-2
Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos [Finep]. (2006, 02 de abril). Chamada Pública MCT/SEBRAE/Finep/Ação Transversal – Cooperação ICT’s – MPEs – 07/2006. Finep. http://finep.gov.br/chamadas-publicas/chamadapublica/300
Freeman, C. (1988). Introduction. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete, (Eds.). Technical Change and Economic Theory. (pp. 1-8). Pinter Publishers.
Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309
Freitas, J. S., Gonçalves, C. A., Cheng, L. C., & Muniz, R. M. (2011). O fenômeno das spin-offs acadêmicas: Estruturando um novo campo de pesquisa no Brasil. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 8(4), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.5773/rai.v8i4.698
Fuster, E., Padilla-Meléndez, A., Lockett, N., & del-Águila-Obra, A. R. (2019). The emerging role of university spin-off companies in developing regional entrepreneurial university ecosystems: The case of Andalusia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.020
Gala, P. (2017). Complexidade Econômica: uma nova perspectiva para entender a antiga questão da Riqueza das Nações. Contraponto.
Gilsing, V. A., Burg, E., & Romme, A. G. L. (2010). Policy principles for the creation and success of corporate and academic spin-offs. Technovation, 30(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.07.004
Hayter, C. S. (2013). Harnessing university entrepreneurship for economic growth: Factors of success among university spin-offs. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242412471845
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
Hossinger, S. M., Chen, X., & Werner, A. (2020). Drivers, barriers and success factors of academic spin-offs: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 70(1), 97-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00161-w
Kang, B. (2021). Innovation Processes in Public Research Institutes: AIST, Fraunhofer and ITRI Case Studies. Science, Technology and Society, 26(3), 433-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721821995588
Kenney, M. (2011). How venture capital became a component of the US National System of Innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1677-1723. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr061
Kervalt, M. (2019, 07 de julho). Mais de 2,2 mil processos de registro de agrotóxicos esperam análise. Campo e Lavoura. Gauchazh. https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/economia/campo-e-lavoura/noticia/2019/06/mais-de-22-mil-processos-de-registro-de-agrotoxicos-esperam-analise-cjwm2y98503u301qtew20y7we.html?adlt=strict&toWww=1&redig=5635865AC56D45A497BFE08336E1EF6B
Kniazevych, A., Kyrylenko, V., & Golovkova, L. (2018). Innovation infrastructure of Ukraine: assessment of the effectiveness of the action and ways of improvement. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-208-218
Kolade, O., Adegbile, A., & Sarpong, D. (2022). Can university-industry-government collaborations drive a 3-D printing revolution in Africa? A triple helix model of technological leapfrogging in additive manufacturing. Technology in Society, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101960
Lee, K., Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2021). Variety of national innovation systems (NIS) and alternative pathways to growth beyond the middle-income stage: Balanced, imbalanced, catching-up, and trapped NIS. World Development, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105472
Lei nº 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004. (2004, 3 de dezembro). Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2004/Lei/L10.973.htm.
Lei nº 7.802, de 11 de julho de 1989. (1989, 11 de julho). Dispõe sobre o destino dos resíduos e embalagens, o registro, a classificação, o controle, a inspeção e a fiscalização de agrotóxicos, seus componentes e afins, e dá outras providências. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L7802.htm.
Lein, H. C., & Vidigal, P. (2021). A atuação da Fundação de Apoio na economia baseada no conhecimento: o caso do Sibratecnano na FUNDEP. In M. S. Rapini, & A. C. Q Barbosa (Org.). Inovação, Ciência, Tecnologia e Gestão - a UFMG em Perspectiva (Cap. 11, pp. 229-248). FACE - UFMG.
Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., & Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. BioControl, 63(1), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4
Link, A. N., & Siegel, D. S. (2005). University-based technology initiatives: Quantitative and qualitative evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 253-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.005
Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981-993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.010
Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (2010). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (Vol. 2). Anthem Press.
Lundvall, B. Å., & Rikap, C. (2022). China's catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104395
Lundvall, B. Å (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.). Technical Change and Economic Theory. (Chap.17, pp. 349-369). Pinter Publishers
Lundvall, B. Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8
Mäkinen, E. I., & Esko, T. (2022). Nascent academic entrepreneurs and identity work at the boundaries of professional domains. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503211063896
Mamão, G. (2017). Inovação na Raiz: Uma jornada empreendedora a partir da universidade brasileira. Editora Voo.
Mankins, J. C. (1995, april). Technology readiness levels. White Paper, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247705707_Technology_Readiness_Level_-_A_White_Paper?adlt=strict&toWww=1&redig=C9B2FF9FB92247789EE2A6930E3FB410
Marconi, M. A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2003). Fundamentos de metodologia científica. (5ª ed.). Atlas.
Mathisen, M. T., & Rasmussen, E. (2019). The development, growth, and performance of university spin-offs: A critical review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(6), 1891-1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-09714-9
Mazzucato, M. (2014). O estado empreendedor: desmascarando o mito do setor público vs. setor privado. Portfolio-Penguin.
Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.008
Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R., Neelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis, (pp. 3-21), Oxford University Press.
Parmentola, A., & Ferretti, M. (2018). Stages and trigger factors in the development of academic spin-offs: An explorative study in southern Italy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), 478–500. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2017-0159
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
Prodanov, C. C., & Freitas, E. C. (2013). Metodologia do Trabalho Científico: Métodos e Técnicas da Pesquisa e do Trabalho Acadêmico (2ª ed.). Universidade Feevale. https://aedmoodle.ufpa.br/pluginfile.php/291348/mod_resource/content/3/2.1-E-book-Metodologia-do-Trabalho-Cientifico-2.pdf?adlt=strict&toWww=1&redig=65E97CC86C624FC8BA61E08ECC163B1B
Samo, A. H., & Huda, N. U. (2019). Triple Helix and academic entrepreneurial intention: understanding motivating factors for academic spin-off among young researchers. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-018-0121-7
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410372151
Sandström, C., Wennberg, K., Wallin, M. W., & Zherlygina, Y. (2018). Public policy for academic entrepreneurship initiatives: A review and critical discussion. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1232-1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9536-x
Santos-Arteaga, F. J., Di Caprio, D., Tavana, M., & O’Connor, A. (2017). Innovation dynamics and labor force restructuring with asymmetrically developed national innovation systems. International Business Review, 26(1), 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.005
Sarabia-Altamirano, G. (2016). La vinculación universidad-empresa y sus canales de interacción desde la perspectiva de la academia, de la empresa y de las políticas públicas. CienciaUAT, 10(2), 13-22.
Sharif, N. (2006). Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept. Research Policy, 35(5), 745-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001
Sousa-Ginel, E., Franco-Leal, N., & Camelo-Ordaz, C. (2021). Knowledge conversion capability and networks as drivers of innovation in Academic Spin-Offs. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101615
Stake, R. E. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos. Ediciones Morata.
Steen, M., Ortt, R., & Scholten, V. (2010). Exploring determinants of life sciences spin-off creation: empirical evidence from the Netherlands. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 10(1), 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesb.2010.033047
Tuunainen, J. (2005). Hybrid practices? Contributions to the debate on the mutation of science and university. High Educ, 50(2), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6355-z
Vargas, J., & Santos, A. N. (2021). Brazil and its National System of Innovation (Nis): Perspectives and Challenges. Revista FSA, 18(9), 64-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.12819/2021.18.9.4
Vinuto, J. (2014). A amostragem em bola de neve na pesquisa qualitativa: um debate em aberto. Temáticas, 22(44), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.20396/tematicas.v22i44.10977
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0
Widding, L. O., Mathisen, M. T., & Madsen, O. (2009). University-affiliated venture capital funds: Funding of university spin-off companies. Internacional Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 8(2-3), 229-245.
Ye, W., & Wang, Y. (2019). Exploring the Triple Helix Synergy in Chinese National System of Innovation. Sustainability, 11(23), 6678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236678
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Os direitos autorais dos originais aprovados serão automaticamente transferidos à Revista, como condição para sua publicação, e para encaminhamentos junto às bases de dados de indexação de periódicos científicos.
Esta cessão passará a valer a partir da submissão do manuscrito, em formulário apropriado, disponível no Sistema Eletrônico de Editoração da Revista.
A revista se reservará o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos(as) autores(as).
Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos(às) autores(as), quando necessário. Nesses casos, os artigos, depois de adequados, deverão ser submetidos a nova apreciação.
As provas finais serão encaminhadas aos(às) autores(as).
Os trabalhos publicados passarão a ser de propriedade da Revista, ficando sua re-impressão (total ou parcial) sujeita à autorização expressa da Revista. Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação: Revista Gestão & Conexões.
A Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo e/ou quaisquer das instâncias editoriais envolvidas com o periódico não se responsabilizarão pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos. As opiniões emitidas pelos(as) autores(as) dos artigos serão de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
Em todo e qualquer tipo de estudo que envolva situações de relato de caso clínico é fundamental o envio de cópia do Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido assinado(s) pelo(s) paciente(s).