Nueva gestión pública y gestión por resultados: una revisión bibliométrica de estudios en el contexto de las instituciones de educación superior

Autores/as
Palabras clave:
Nueva Gestión Pública, Gestión Basada en Resultados, Instituciones de Educación Superior
Resumen

Este artículo presenta una revisión bibliométrica de la implementación y desarrollo de la Nueva Gestión Pública (NGP) y la Gestión por Resultados en las instituciones de educación superior. Con el objetivo de identificar tendencias y brechas de investigación desde 2014 hasta 2024, la revisión abarcó publicaciones indexadas en las bases de datos Scopus y Web of Science, dando como resultado 35 artículos seleccionados. Los resultados cuantitativos indican picos de publicaciones en los años 2016, 2018 y 2021, con una notable concentración de estudios provenientes de Australia, Reino Unido y Estados Unidos. El análisis de palabras clave revela que los estudios abordan predominantemente temas relacionados con el desempeño, la rendición de cuentas y las reformas del sector público. Los resultados cualitativos muestran que los artículos examinan principalmente los impactos de la Gestión por Resultados en el financiamiento universitario y la evaluación del desempeño del profesorado, con un enfoque en los cambios estructurales y las presiones sobre el personal académico. Este estudio contribuye a la comprensión de los impactos de las teorías de la NGP y la Gestión por Resultados en las instituciones de educación superior, identificando una brecha en la literatura científica sobre este tema en los países de América Latina. El estudio sugiere la necesidad de realizar más investigaciones sobre los efectos de estos enfoques más allá de la financiación, particularmente en la vida profesional de los profesores.

Biografía del autor/a
  1. Marcela Boldrini Gazzani Guedes, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)

    Possui graduação em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (2013) e MBA em Gerenciamento de Projetos pela Universidade Vila Velha. Atualmente ocupa o cargo assistente em administração da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo e Mestranda em Gestão Pública. https://lattes.cnpq.br/3218628835411297

  2. Fabrícia Benda de Oliveira, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)

    Possui graduação em Engenharia de Agrimensura, pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (2005), Mestrado em Engenharia Civil - Geotecnia, pela Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (2008), Doutorado em Produção Vegetal, pela Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (2014). É professora Associada I no Departamento de Geologia da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo desde 2009. Atua como Professora Permanente e orientadora nos Programas de Pós-graduação em Gestão Pública, Agroquímica e Geografia, na Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Atua principalmente nos temas: Gestão Pública, SIG, Geoprocessamento, Geotecnologias, GPS, Cartografia, VANT, Geoestatística, Lógica Fuzzy e Análise Multicritério. http://lattes.cnpq.br/9513837515797451

  3. Rodrigo Randow de Freitas, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Centro Universitário Norte do Espírito Santo (Ceunes)

    Bolsista de Produtividade Capixaba - EDITAL FAPES 06/2022 - BPC EDITAL FAPES Nº 06/2021. Professor Adjunto do curso de Engenharia de Produção em regime de dedicação exclusiva da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo no campus São Mateus, E.S. / UFES-CEUNES (2015). Doutor pelo programa de Pós-Graduação em Aquacultura pela Fundação Universidade Federal de Rio Grande (FURG) em 2011; Mestrado em Aquacultura pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2006); Especialização em Educação e Gestão Ambiental (Faculdade Saberes - 2003); e Graduação em Administração de Empresas: ênfase em análise de sistemas (Faculdade de Ciências Humanas de Vitória - 2001). Experiência na área de Gestão Ambiental e Gerenciamento Costeiro, Gestão de processos e produtos, análise de cadeias produtivas e Planejamento Estratégico. http://lattes.cnpq.br/8940464292334970

Referencias

Abrúcio, F. L. (1998). Os avanços e os dilemas do modelo pós-burocrático: a reforma da Administração Pública à luz da experiência internacional recente. In: Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos; Spink, Peter. (Org.). Reforma do Estado e Administração Pública Gerencial. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas. p. 173-199.

Allen, B. & Eppel, E. (2020). Holding on tight – NPM and the New Zealand performance improvement framework. Australian journal of public administration, 79, 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12405

Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: uma ferramenta R para abrangente análise de mapeamento científico. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Baines, D., Charlesworth, S., Turner, D., & O’neill, L. (2014). Lean social care and worker identity: The role of outcomes, supervision and mission. Critical Social Policy, 34(4), 433-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018314538799

Bartolini, M., Bottani, E. & Grosse, E. H. (2019). Green warehousing: Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 242-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.055

Bentzen, T. Ø. & Torfing, J. (2023). COVID-19-induced governance transformation: How external shocks may spur cross-organizational collaboration and trust-based management. Public Administration, 101(4), 1291-1308. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12881

Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (1997). Estratégia e estrutura para um novo Estado. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 17(3), 343357. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31571997-0944

Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2014). Reflexões sobre a reforma gerencial brasileira de 1995. Revista do Serviço Público, 50 (4). https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v50i4.354

Crossan, M. M. & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (6), 1154-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Dougherty, K. J. & Natow, R. S. (2020). Performance-based funding for higher education: how well does neoliberal theory capture neoliberal practice? High Educ 80, 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00491-4

Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. Harper & Row.

Du, J. & Lapsley, I. (2019). The Reform of UK Universities: A Management Dream, An Academic Nightmare? Abacus, 55: 452-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12167

Ellegaard, O. & Wallin, J. A. (2015) The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, v. 105, p. 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z.

Esmark, A. (2017). Maybe it is time to rediscover technocracy an old framework for a new analysis of administrative reforms in the governance era. Journal of public administration research and theory, 27(3), 501-516. https://10.1093/jopart/muw059

Field, L. (2015). Appraising academic appraisal in the new public management university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(2), 172-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.991534

Fuka, J., Lesakova, P., & Bata, R. (2018). Sustainable Value as a Tool for Performance Measurement of the Region. Journal of Local Self-Government, 16 (4), 693. https://doi.org/ 10.4335/16.4.693-713

Gill-McLure, W. (2017). Adaptation, evolution and survival? The political economy of Whitleyism and public service industrial relations in the U.K. 1917-present. Labor History, 59(1), 15-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2017.1375579

Han, C. & Kim, S. (2017). The Changing Modes of Administrative Reform in South Korea. Transylvanian Review Of Administrative Sciences, 13(50), 54-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.2017.0004

Hill, K. & Plimmer, G. (2024). Employee Performance Management: The Impact of Competing Goals, Red Tape, and PSM. Public Personnel Management, 53(3), 458-485. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260241231371

Hyndman, N. & Liguori, M. (2016). Justifying accounting change through global discourses and legitimation strategies. The case of the UK central government. Accounting and Business Research, 46(4), 390-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1124256

Janßen, M. & Sondermann, A. (2016). L’évaluation des performances universitaires – une menace pour l’identité professorale? Sur la perception subjective de l’évaluation et du contrôle des performances scientifiques à l’ère de la nouvelle gestion publique. Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie, 26(3-4), 377-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-017-0323-9

Jelonek, M. & Mazur, S. (2020). Necessary changes, adverse effects? The institutional patterns of adaptation of economics universities to changes prompted by the reform of Poland’s science and higher education system. Management Learning, 51(4), 472-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620913896

Jongbloed, B. & Vossensteyn, H. (2016). University funding and student funding: International comparisons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(4), 576-595. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw029

Junquilho, G. S. (2000). Ação gerencial na Administração Pública: a re/produção de “raízes” brasileiras. (Tese de Doutorado em Administração). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas, Belo Horizonte, BH, Brasil.

Junquilho, G. S. (2010). Teorias da administração pública [Apostila]. Florianópolis: Departamento de Ciências da Administração / UFSC; [Brasília]: CAPES: UAB,.182p.

Kallio, K. M. & Kallio, T. J. (2014). Management-by-results and performance measurement in universities – implications for work motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 574-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709497

Kihato, C. W. & Landau, L. B. (2017). Stealth Humanitarianism: Negotiating Politics, Precarity and Performance Management in Protecting the Urban Displaced, Journal of Refugee Studies, 30(3), 407-425. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/few031

Knafo, S. (2019). Neoliberalism and the origins of public management. Review of International Political Economy, 27(4), 780-801. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1625425

Ledin, P.,& Machin, D. (2016). Strategic diagrams and the technologization of culture. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(3), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.3.06led

Maran, L., Bracci, E., & Inglis, R. (2018). Performance management systems' stability: Unfolding the human factor – A case from the Italian public sector. The British Accounting Review, 50(3), 324-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.01.002

McMullin, C. (2021). Challenging the necessity of New Public Governance: Co-production by third sector organizations under different models of public management. Public Admin., 99: 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12672

Nath, N. & Sharma, U. (2014), Performance Management Systems in the Public Housing Sector: Dissemination to Diffusion. Australian Accounting Review, 24: 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12004

Nuti, S., Noto, G., Ruggieri, T. G., & Vainieri, M. The Challenges of Hospitals’ Planning & Control Systems: The Path toward Public Value Management. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(5), 2732. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052732

Nyamori, R. O. & Gekara, V. O. (2016). Performance contracting and social capital (re)formation: A case study of Nairobi City Council in Kenya. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 40, 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.06.004

Plaček, M., del Campo, C., Půček, M., Ochrana, F., Křápek, M., & Nemec, J. (2021). New Public Management and Its Influence on Museum Performance: The Case of Czech Republic. Journal of East European Management Studies, 26(2), 339-361. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27284510

Sayed, N., Lento, C., & Henderson, M. (2022). Application of the Balanced Scorecard for strategy reformulation: Perspectives from a Canadian municipality. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue canadienne des sciences de l’administration, 39(3), 328-346. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1644

Shahan, A. M., Jahan, F., & Khair, R. A. (2021). A glimpse of light in darkness: Performance-based accountability in Bangladesh public administration. Public Administration and Development, 41(4), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1945

Speckbacher, G. (2024). Values, Performance, or Both? How Values-Focused Work Can Benefit from Results-Based Management. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(3), 770-789. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231184810

Simonet, D. (2021). French Idiosyncratic Health-Care Reforms, Performance Management and Its Political Repercussions. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 14, 2971-2981. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S306381

Tabrizi, J. S., HaghGoshayie, E., Doshmangir, L., & Yousefi, M. (2018). New public management in Iran’s health complex: a management framework for primary health care system. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 19(3), 264-276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423617000767

Tenbensel, T., Silwal, P., & Walton, L. (2021). Overwriting New Public Management with New Public Governance in New Zealand's approach to health system improvement. Journal of health organization and management, 35(8), 1046-1061.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-10-2020-0417

Ugyel, L. (2021). Relationship between public sector reforms and culture: The implementation of NPM-related performance management reforms in a collectivist and risk averse culture. Public Administration and Development, 41(5), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1962

Uman, T., Argento, D., Grossi, G., & Mattei, G. (2024). Supportive leadership and job satisfaction at the European Court of Auditors. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(2), 454-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231187275

Verbeeten, F. H. M. & Speklé, R. F. (2015). Management Control, Results-Oriented Culture and Public Sector Performance: Empirical Evidence on New Public Management. Organization Studies, 36(7), 953-978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580014

Visser, M., Schouteten, R., & Dikkers, J. (2019). Controlling the Courts: New Public Management and the Dutch Judiciary. Justice System Journal, 40(1), 39-53. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2018.1539645

Wang, M., Zhu, C. J., Mayson, S., & Chen, W. (2017). Contextualizing performance appraisal practices in Chinese public sector organizations: the importance of context and areas for future study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(5), 902-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1292537

Cover Image
Publicado
2025-03-24
Sección
GESTIÓN PÚBLICA
Licencia

Derechos de autor 2025 Marcela Boldrini Gazzani Guedes, Fabrícia Benda de Oliveira, Rodrigo Randow de Freitas (Autor)

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Todas las obras publicadas en la Revista Brasileña de Ingeniería de Producción (BJPE) están bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Esto significa que: Cualquier persona puede copiar, distribuir, exhibir, adaptar, remezclar e incluso utilizar comercialmente el contenido publicado en la revista; Siempre que se reconozca debidamente a los autores y a BJPE como fuente original; No se requiere permiso adicional para la reutilización, siempre que se respeten los términos de la licencia. Esta política cumple con los principios de acceso abierto, promoviendo la amplia difusión del conocimiento científico. 🔗 Haga clic aquí para acceder a la licencia completa.

Cómo citar

Guedes, M. B. G., Oliveira, F. B. de, & Freitas, R. R. de. (2025). Nueva gestión pública y gestión por resultados: una revisión bibliométrica de estudios en el contexto de las instituciones de educación superior. Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering, 11(1), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v11i1.44559