Perspectives of bibliographic production inherent in process management in the public sector obtained through the ordinatio method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v10i3.44695Keywords:
Business Process Management, Federal University, Method OrdinatioAbstract
Process management is fundamental to increasing the efficiency, productivity and quality of public services. Although its roots are historical, process management has expanded significantly in recent decades. Using the Ordinatio Method, a systematic search was conducted in the Scopus and Web of Science databases, focusing on articles published between 2014 and 2023. The initial search identified 286 articles, and after using exclusion criteria, and based on of relevance and quality, 20 articles were analyzed in depth. The main results indicate that the business process management (BPM) culture in public administration is influenced by factors such as professional experience, employee responsibilities and organization size. The analysis revealed additional challenges due to the complexity and bureaucracy of the government environment. However, digital transformation and the adoption of emerging technologies are modernizing administrative processes, improving the accessibility and personalization of public services. This study highlights the importance of structured practices and continuous innovations to overcome challenges and improve the quality of public services.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, T. & Van Looy, A. (2020). Business Process Management and Digital Innovations: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(17), 6827.
Alvarenga, C. A. (2013). Proposta de modelo de mapeamento e gestão por macroprocessos (Dissertação de Doutorado em Engenharia da Produção). Escola Politécnica da USP, São Paulo.
Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
Baldam, M. R., Valle, R., & Rozenfeld, H. (2014). Gerenciamento de processos de negócio - BPM: uma referência para implantação prática. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Klein, L., Vieira, K. M., Feltrin, T. S. F. & Pissutti, M. (2021). Valores Lean Management como suporte para a gestão de processos: Uma avaliação sobre efetividade e maturidade de processos. Teoria e Prática em Administração.
Korenova, D. & Cepelova, A. (2016). Factors influencing process management and effective operation of public administration organizations.
Kregel, I. & Coners, A. (2018). Introducing Lean Six Sigma to a German municipality: an action research report.
Kregel, I., Distel, B., & Coners, A. (2022). Business process management culture in public administration and its determinants. Business & Information Systems Engineering.
Oliveira, D. P. R. (2007). Administração de Processos: conceitos, metodologia, práticas (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. (2015). Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2109-2135.
Paim, R., Cardos, V., Caulliraux, H., & Clemente, R. (2009). Gestão de Processos: pensar, agir e aprender. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Tribunal de Contas da União. Instituto Serzedello Correa. (2013). Curso de Mapeamento de Processos de Trabalho com BPMN e Bizagi. Brasília, TCU.
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087.
![](https://periodicos.ufes.br/public/journals/56/submission_44695_40342_coverImage_en_US.png)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
![](https://periodicos.ufes.br/public/site/images/revistabjpe/lateral-siteindexadores-16.png)