Comparative study of thermogravimetric analysis among four microalgae species: Thermal characterization for bioenergy applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21712/lajer.2025.v12.n3.p123-128Keywords:
pyrolysis, thermal degradation, biomass characterization, energy conversionAbstract
The energy exploitation of microalgae has attracted increasing interest due to their rapid growth, high lipid content, and CO₂ capture potential, making them a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. However, variations in the proportions of lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, and ash in microalgae can influence the production of bio-oil, synthesis gas, and biochar. To highlight promising applications of specific species, thermogravimetric analyses play a fundamental role. Therefore, this research compares the thermal degradation of four microalgae species (Nannochloropsis oculata, Tetraselmis chuii, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, and Isochrysis galbana) using thermogravimetric analysis. Dried samples were subjected to tests in an inert nitrogen atmosphere, in platinum crucibles, with an initial mass of approximately 15 mg, heating from 25 to 800 °C and a rate of 10 °C/min. Based on the TGA and DTG curves, the initial temperature (Tonset), maximum degradation rate (Tmax), end of the main decomposition stage (Toffset), and final residue were determined. The results indicated similar profiles, with three degradation stages, but relevant differences between species. Nannochloropsis oculata showed the most intense DTG peak, indicating a greater release of volatiles, while Phaeodactylum tricornutum exhibited lower degradation intensity and a higher final residue (45.7%), suggesting a higher ash content. The species Tetraselmis chuii and Isochrysis galbana showed intermediate behavior. Despite the similarities in the decomposition pattern, the variations in thermal parameters indicate significant compositional differences, which can directly impact the thermochemical conversion potential. This reinforces the importance of TGA/DTG as a tool for selecting microalgal species for sustainable energy applications.
Downloads
References
Atmanli A (2020) ‘Experimental comparison of biodiesel production performance of two different microalgae’, Fuel, 278:118311, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2020.118311.
Bach QV and Chen WH (2017) ‘Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of microalgae via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA): A state-of-the-art review’, Bioresource Technology, 246:88–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.06.087.
Cano-Pleite E, Rubio-Rubio M, García-Hernando N and Soria-Verdugo A (2020) ‘Microalgae pyrolysis under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions’, Algal Research, 51:102031, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ALGAL.2020.102031.
Ceylan S and Kazan D (2015) ‘Pyrolysis kinetics and thermal characteristics of microalgae Nannochloropsis oculata and Tetraselmis sp.’, Bioresource Technology, 187:1–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2015.03.081.
Choix FJ, López-Cisneros CG and Méndez-Acosta HO (2018) ‘Azospirillum brasilense Increases CO2 Fixation on Microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorella vulgaris, and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Cultured on High CO2 Concentrations’, Microbial Ecology, 76(2):430–442, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00248-017-1139-Z.
Elshobary ME, Ebaid R, Alquraishi M and Ende SSW (2025) ‘Synergistic microalgal cocultivation: Boosting flocculation, biomass production, and fatty acids profile of Nannochloropsis oculata and Phaeodactylum tricornutum’, Biomass and Bioenergy, 193:107595, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2025.107595.
He Y, Zhang B, Guo S, Guo Z, Chen B and Wang M (2020) ‘Sustainable biodiesel production from the green microalgae Nannochloropsis: Novel integrated processes from cultivation to enzyme-assisted extraction and ethanolysis of lipids’, Energy Conversion and Management, 209:112618, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2020.112618.
Jamilla Vilar De Brito Y, Santos De Almeida Lopes T, Brito W, Santos D, Torquato AL, Lúcia Antunes De Lima V and Ferreira WB (2020) ‘The Scenedesmus acuminatus microalgae in culture media aiming at the production of biodiesel’, Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 15(2):202–207, https://doi.org/10.18378/RVADS.V15I2.6484.
Krishnamoorthy A, Rodriguez C and Durrant A (2023) ‘Optimisation of ultrasonication pretreatment on microalgae Chlorella Vulgaris & Nannochloropsis Oculata for lipid extraction in biodiesel production’, Energy, 278:128026, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2023.128026.
Matos J, Afonso C, Cardoso C, Serralheiro ML and Bandarra NM (2021) ‘Yogurt Enriched with Isochrysis galbana: An Innovative Functional Food’, Foods 2021, Vol. 10, Page 1458, 10(7):1458, https://doi.org/10.3390/FOODS10071458.
Miao X and Wu Q (2004) ‘High yield bio-oil production from fast pyrolysis by metabolic controlling of Chlorella protothecoides’, Journal of Biotechnology, 110(1):85–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBIOTEC.2004.01.013.
dos Santos MGB, Duarte RL, Maciel AM, Abreu M, Reis A and de Mendonça HV (2021) ‘Microalgae Biomass Production for Biofuels in Brazilian Scenario: A Critical Review’, Bioenergy Research, 14(1):23–42, https://doi.org/10.1007/S12155-020-10180-1.
Vassilev S V., Baxter D, Andersen LK and Vassileva CG (2013) ‘An overview of the composition and application of biomass ash.: Part 2. Potential utilisation, technological and ecological advantages and challenges’, Fuel, 105:19–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2012.10.001.
Wang H, Qi M, Bo Y, Zhou C, Yan X, Wang G and Cheng P (2021) ‘Treatment of fishery wastewater by co-culture of Thalassiosira pseudonana with Isochrysis galbana and evaluation of their active components’, Algal Research, 60:102498, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ALGAL.2021.102498.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Latin American Journal of Energy Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
O autor, no ato da submissão do artigo, transfere o direito autoral ao periódico.
