Philosophical affiliation and freedom of thought in Roman Epicureanism

a brief discussion based on texts by Lucretius and Cicero

Authors

  • Sidney Calheiros de Lima Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29327/2345891.21.21-9

Keywords:

Philosophy, Latin literature, Lucretius, Cicero

Abstract

We seek to discuss how allegiance to a philosophical sect and freedom of thought are related in the context of the reception of Epicureanism in Rome, based on the analysis of passages from texts by Lucretius and Cicero. The starting point is the observation of the way in which the relationship between the persona of the poet-teacher and the authority whose doctrine he expounds is built in De rerum natura. Next, we analyze texts in which Cicero explores the relationship between the followers of the Garden and Epicurus. We try to show how the approach to this relationship serves the criticisms undertaken by Cicero against Epicureanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Documentação textual

CICERO. Academica. Text revised and explained by J.S. Reid. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1984.

CICERO. De diuinatione. With an English translation by W. A. Falconer. London: Harvard University Press, 1992.

CICERO. De finibus bonorum et malorum. Recognouit breuique adnotatione critica instruxit L. D. Reynolds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

CICERO. De natura deorum / Academica. With an English translation by H. Rackham. London: Harvard University Press, 1979.

CICERO. De natura deorum. Translated and edited by A. S. Pease. London: Harvard University Press, 1955.

CICERO. Epistulae ad Atticum. Edited by D. R. Shackleton Bailey. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1987. 2v.

CICERO. Epistulae ad familiares. Edited by D. R. Shackleton Bailey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. 2v.

CICERO. Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et ad M. Brutum. Edited by D. R. Shackleton Bailey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

CICÉRON. Traité du destin. Texte établi et traduit par Albert Yon. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1973.

HOMERO. Odisseia. Tradução de Trajano Vieira. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2011.

LUCRÉCIO. De rerum natura. Edited by John Martin. Leipzig: Teubner, 1953.

SENECA. Epistles: 1-65. Translated by Richard M. Gummere. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1917. v. 1.

Obras de apoio

ASMIS, E. Epicurean poetics. In: OBBINK, D. (ed.). Philodemus and poetry: poetic theory and practice in Lucretius, Philodemus and Horace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

ASMIS, E. Lucretius’ Venus and Stoic Zeus. In: GALE, M. (ed.). Oxford readings in Lucretius. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 88-103.

BOYANCÉ, P. Lucrèce et l´épicurisme. Paris: PUF, 1963.

COLMAN, J. Lucretius as a theorist of political life. New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 2012.

GALE, M. R. Myth and poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

HADOT, P. Discours et mode de vie philosophique. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2014.

HADOT, P. Philosophie, exégèse, contresens. Akten des XIV. Internationalen Kongresses für Philosophie, v. 1, p. 333-339, 1968.

SEDLEY, D. Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world. In: GRIFFIN, M.; BARNES, J. (ed.). Philosophia togata I. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.

VOLK, K. The poetics of Latin didactic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Published

19-09-2023

How to Cite

CALHEIROS DE LIMA, Sidney. Philosophical affiliation and freedom of thought in Roman Epicureanism: a brief discussion based on texts by Lucretius and Cicero. Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos, [S. l.], n. 21, p. 173–192, 2023. DOI: 10.29327/2345891.21.21-9. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufes.br/romanitas/article/view/40801. Acesso em: 7 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Open subject