Avaliação do ciclo de vida de ferrovias de carga: uma análise crítica e uma proposta de diretriz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v10i2.44372Keywords:
avaliação do ciclo de vida, ACV, ferrovias de carga, diretrizesAbstract
Este estudo realiza uma revisão de vários artigos no contexto de ferrovias, em que a metodologia de avaliação do ciclo de vida (LCA) é aplicada. Usando a metodologia ProKnow-C, foram analisados sete artigos de revisão e 85 artigos originais que aplicam a metodologia de ACV a ferrovias, e foram identificadas várias lacunas importantes, principalmente no que diz respeito à falta de divulgação de informações sobre parâmetros, software e outras decisões importantes tomadas durante os trabalhos que permitiriam a outros pesquisadores replicar os resultados para compará-los com outras ferrovias ou circunstâncias diferentes. Atualmente, não há normas ISO que abordem a ACV de ferrovias, portanto, este trabalho busca fornecer um conjunto inicial de diretrizes, facilitando assim a elaboração de tal norma e fornecendo suporte e orientação para pesquisadores da área.
Downloads
References
Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Association of American Railroads. (2023). Association of American Railroads. Freight rail & climate change 2023 Retrieved from https://www.aar.org/issue/freight-rail-climate-change/
Baitz, M., Albrecht, S., Brauner, E., Broadbent, C., Castellan, G., Conrath, P., & Fullana Palmer, P. (2013). LCA’s theory and practice: like ebony and ivory living in perfect harmony? In (Vol. 18, pp. 5-13): Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0476-x
Brander, M. & Wylie, C. (2011). The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, 1(3-4), 161-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2011.637670
Diaz, M. A. H., Scouse, A., & Kelley, S. S. (2022). Environmental full cost accounting of alternative materials used for railroad ties: Treated-wood and concrete case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132536
Dincer, I. & Zamfirescu, C. (2016). A review of novel energy options for clean rail applications. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 28, 461-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.007
Du, G. & Karoumi, R. (2014). Life cycle assessment framework for railway bridges: literature survey and critical issues. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(3), 277-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.749289
Earles, J. M. & Halog, A. (2011). Consequential life cycle assessment: a review. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 16, 445-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0275-9
Edelen, A. & Ingwersen, W. W. (2018). The creation, management, and use of data quality information for life cycle assessment. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 23, 759-772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1348-1
Ekvall, T. & Finnveden, G. (2001). Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(3), 197-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00052-4
Ekvall, T. & Weidema, B. P. (2004). System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 9, 161-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994190
Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., Lacerda, R. T. d. O., & Tasca, J. E. (2010). ProKnow-C, Knowledge Development Process–Constructivist: processo técnico com patente de registro pendente junto ao INPI. Brasil:[sn].
Fridell, E., Bäckström, S., & Stripple, H. (2019). Considering infrastructure when calculating emissions for freight transportation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 69, 346-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.013
ISO. (2006a). 14040. Environmental management—life cycle assessment - principles and framework.
ISO. (2006b). 14044. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines.
ISO. (2014). 13315-2. Environmental management for concrete and concrete structures. Part 2: System boundary and inventory data
ISO. (2020). 22888. Railway applications — Concepts and basic requirements for the planning of railway operation in the event of earthquakes.
ISO. (2022). 23054-1. Railway applications — Track geometry quality. Part 1: Characterization of track geometry and track geometry quality.
ISO. (2024). 13315-1. Environmental management for concrete and concrete structures. Part 1: General principles.
Jiang, C., Wan, Y., Yang, H., & Zhang, A. (2021). Impacts of high-speed rail projects on CO2 emissions due to modal interactions: A review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 100, 103081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103081
Olugbenga, O., Kalyviotis, N., & Saxe, S. (2019). Embodied emissions in rail infrastructure: a critical literature review. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 123002.
Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. (2015). Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics, 105, 2109-2135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x
Olugbenga, O., Kalyviotis, N., & Saxe, S. (2019). Embodied emissions in rail infrastructure: a critical literature review. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 123002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab442f
Rebello, T. A., Roque, R. P., Gonçalves, R. F., Calmon, J. L., & Queiroz, L. M. (2021). Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater treatment plants: a critical analysis and guideline proposal. Water Science and Technology, 83(3), 501-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.608
Scopus (2023). http://www..scopus.com
Trevisan, L. & Bordignon, M. (2020). Screening Life Cycle Assessment to compare CO2 and Greenhouse Gases emissions of air, road, and rail transport: An exploratory study. Procedia CIRP, 90, 303-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.100
Vaz, C. R., Tasca, J. E., Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., & Selig, P. M. (2012). Avaliação de desempenho na gestão estratégica organizacional: seleção de um referencial teórico de pesquisa e análise bibliométrica. Revista Gestão Industrial, 8(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3895/S1808-04482012000400008
Vieira, D. R., Calmon, J. L., & Coelho, F. Z. (2016). Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 656-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.125
Weidema, B. P., Pizzol, M., Schmidt, J., & Thoma, G. (2018). Attributional or consequential life cycle assessment: a matter of social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 305-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.340
Xiao, X., Cai, D., Lou, L., Shi, Y., & Xiao, F. (2021). Application of asphalt-based materials in railway systems: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 304, 124630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124630
Web of Science (2023). http://www.webofscience.com
Zang, Y., Li, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, W., & Xiong, W. (2015). Towards more accurate life cycle assessment of biological wastewater treatment plants: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 676-692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.060
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All works published in the Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering (BJPE) are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This means that:
Anyone can copy, distribute, display, adapt, remix, and even commercially use the content published in the journal;
Provided that due credit is given to the authors and to BJPE as the original source;
No additional permission is required for reuse, as long as the license terms are respected.
This policy complies with the principles of open access, promoting the broad dissemination of scientific knowledge.


2.png)


























































