Imagens do Empreendedorismo: Uso de Metáforas para a Pesquisa sobre o Fenômeno Empreendedor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/regec.2317-5087.2022.11.2.37032.118-137Keywords:
Entrepreneurship, Process, Practice, Networks, MetaphorAbstract
In this paper, we present a non-systematic literature review on metaphors applied to the study and research of entrepreneurship. In order to do so, we prioritize papers that developed entrepreneurship metaphors and applied them to the understanding of entrepreneurship theoretical approaches. In this paper, we explored three entrepreneurial metaphors: entrepreneurship as a process; entrepreneurship as a practice; and entrepreneurship as a network. Furthermore, we discussed some implications of these metaphorical approaches to entrepreneurship research. Thus, the reflexive, critical feature that each metaphor assume may contribute to the understanding of entrepreneurial actions related to entities such as the entrepreneur, the business, and the context, in one hand, and to theoretical constructs such as processes, practices, and networks, on the other hand, thus leading the way to the metaphorical constitution of “images of entrepreneurship”.
Downloads
References
Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2010). Entrepreneurship as social construction: a multilevel evolutionary approach. In Z. J. Acs, Z. J. & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.). Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: an interdisciplinary survey and Introduction. (Vol. 1, chap. 15, pp. 359-399). Dordretch: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_15
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4
Andriessen, A., &Gubbins, C. (2009). Metaphor analysis as an approach for exploring theoretical concepts: the case of social capital. OrganizationStudies, 30(8), 845-863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609334952
Aristóteles, A. (1959). Arte retórica e arte poética. São Paulo: Difusão Europeia do Livro.
Blundel, R. (2007). Critical realism: a suitable vehicle for entrepreneurship research. In: H. Neergaard& J. P. Ulhøi (Orgs.). Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship. (Vol. 1, chap. 2, pp. 49-74). Cheltenham: E. Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847204387
Borges, A. F., Brito, M. J., & Lima, J. B. (2016). Entrepreneuring: concebendo o fenômeno do empreendedorismo como uma prática. (2016, setembro). Anais do Encontro Nacional da Associação de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, 40.
Borges, A. F., Lima, J. B., & Brito, M. J. (2017). Fundamentos da pesquisa em empreendedorismo: aspectos conceituais, teóricos, ontológicos e epistemológicos. (2017, outubro). Anais do Encontro Nacional da Associação de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 41.
Borges, A. F., Volta, C. L. C. C., Brito, M. J., & Lima, J. B. (2021). A Construção de Práticas Empreendedoras em Empresas Familiares: Um Estudo no Setor de Cachaça Artesanal. Contextus - Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 19(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2021.61424
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation. In J. Law, (Ed.). Power, action & belief: a new sociology of knowledge? (Vol. 1, chap. 7, pp. 196-223). London: Routledge.
Champenois, C., Lefebvre, V., &Ronteau, S. (2020). Entrepreneurship as practice: systematic literature review of a nascent field. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32(3-4), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1641975
Clark, J., & Holt, R. (2017). Imagery of ad-venture: understanding entrepreneurial identity through metaphor and drawing. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 476-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.06.001
Cornelissen, J. P. (2004). ‘What are we playing at? Theatre, organization and the use of metaphor'. Organization Studies. 25(5), 705-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604042411
Cornelissen, J. P. (2006). Metaphor and the dynamics of knowledge in organization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 683-709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00607.x
Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, J. S. (2010). Imagining and Rationalizing Opportunities: inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 539-557. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok539
Cornelissen, J. P., Kafouros, M., & Lock, A. R. (2005). Metaphorical images of organization: how organizational researchers develop and select organizational metaphors. Human Relations, 58(12), 1545-1578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705061317
Cruz, A. D., Hamilton, E., & Jack, S. L. (2020). Understanding entrepreneurial opportunities through metaphors. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2020.1727089
Demir, R., &Lychnell, L.-O. (2015). Mangling the process: a meta-theoretical account of process theorizing. Qualitative Research, 15(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113517390
Fletcher, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship& Regional Development, 18(5), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620600861105
Gadamer, H.-G. (2007). Hermenêutica em retrospectiva. 2. Ed. Petrópolis, Vozes.
Gaddefors, J. (2007). Metaphor use in the entrepreneurial process. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 13(3), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550710751049
Gartner, W. B. (2012). Entrepreneurship as organization creation. In: D. Hjorth. (Org.). Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: E. Elgar (Vol. 1, chap. 1, p. 21-30).
Gherardi, S., &Nicolini, D. (2005). Actor-Networks: ecology and entrepreneurs. In B. Czarniawska& T. Hernes (Eds.). Actor-network theory and organizing. (Vol. 1, chap. 13, pp. 285-306). Copenhagen: Liber.
Gilhus, I. S. (2016). Hermenêutica. Revista de Estudos da Religião, 16(2), 145-156.
Heidegger, M. (2012). Ser e Tempo. Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp.
Hjorth, D., Holt, R., &Steyaert, C. (2015). Entrepreneurship and process studies. International Small Business Journal, 33(6), 599-611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615583566
Johannisson, B. (2011). Towards a practice theory of entrepreneuring. Small Business Economics, 36(2), 135-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9212-8
Korsgaard, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as translation: understanding entrepreneurial opportunities through actor-network theory. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(7-8), 661-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.546432
Lindgren, M., &Packendorff, J. (2009). Social constructionism and entrepreneurship: basic assumptions and consequences for theory and research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 15(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550910934440
Lundmark, E., Krzeminska, A., Shepherd, D. A. (2019). Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring root metaphors and Expanding upon them. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 138-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717734369
Morgan, G. (2005). Paradigmas, Metáforas e Resolução de Quebra-cabeças na Teoria das Organizações. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 45(1), 58-71.
Morgan, G. (2010). Imagens da organização. São Paulo: Atlas.
Morgan, G. (2016). Commentary: Beyond Morgan’s eight metaphors. Human Relations, 69(4), 1029-1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715624497
Moroz, P. W., &Hindle, K. (2012). Entrepreneurship as a process: toward harmonizing multiple perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 781-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00452.x
Murdock, K. A., &Varnes, C. J. (2017). Beyond effectuation: analyzing the transformation of business ideas into ventures using actor-network theory. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(1), 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2017-0039
Nicolini D. (2017). Practice theory as a package of theory, method and vocabulary: affordances and limitations. In M. Jonas., B. Littig, & A. Wroblewski (Eds). Methodological reflections on practice oriented theories. (Vol 1, chap. 2, pp. 19-34). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7_2
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory,5(2), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
Ricoeur, P. (1978). O conflito das interpretações: ensaios de hermenêutica. Rio de Janeiro: Imago.
Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: practicetheory. In: T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. (Vol 1, chap. 1, pp. 10-23). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977453
Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: the sites of organizations. OrganizationStudies, 26(3), 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050876
Schleiermacher, F. D. E. (2005). Hermenêutica e crítica: com um anexo de textos de Schleiermacher sobre filosofia da linguagem. Ijuí, RS: Unijuí.
Schoeneborn, D., Vasquez, C., & Cornelissen, J. (2016). Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy. HumanRelations, 69(4), 915-944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715612899
Schröder, U. A. (2008). Da teoria cognitiva a uma teoria mais dinâmica, cultural e sociocognitiva da metáfora. Alfa, 52(1), 39-56.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/259271
Shove, E., Pantazar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753
Steen, G. (2011). From three dimensions to five steps: the value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de, 11(21), 83-110.
Steen, G. (2017). Deliberate metaphor theory: basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1-24.
Steyaert, C. (2007). ‘Entrepreneuring’ as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(6), 453-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701671759
Thompson, N. A., & Byrne, O. (2020). Advancing entrepreneurship as practice: previous developments and future possibilities. In W. B. Gartner & B. T. Teague. (Orgs.). Research Handbook on Entrepreneurial Behavior, Practice and Process. (Vol. 1, chap. 3, pp. 30-55). Cheltenham: E. Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788114523.00010
Thompson, N. A., Verduijn, K., &Gartner, W. B. (2020). Entrepreneurship-as-practice: grounding contemporary theories of practice into entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship& Regional Development, 32(3-4), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1641978
Vereza, S. C. (2010). O lócus da metáfora: Linguagem, Pensamento e discurso. Cadernos de Letras da UFF, 41(2), 199-212.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Os direitos autorais dos originais aprovados serão automaticamente transferidos à Revista, como condição para sua publicação, e para encaminhamentos junto às bases de dados de indexação de periódicos científicos.
Esta cessão passará a valer a partir da submissão do manuscrito, em formulário apropriado, disponível no Sistema Eletrônico de Editoração da Revista.
A revista se reservará o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos(as) autores(as).
Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos(às) autores(as), quando necessário. Nesses casos, os artigos, depois de adequados, deverão ser submetidos a nova apreciação.
As provas finais serão encaminhadas aos(às) autores(as).
Os trabalhos publicados passarão a ser de propriedade da Revista, ficando sua re-impressão (total ou parcial) sujeita à autorização expressa da Revista. Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação: Revista Gestão & Conexões.
A Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo e/ou quaisquer das instâncias editoriais envolvidas com o periódico não se responsabilizarão pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos. As opiniões emitidas pelos(as) autores(as) dos artigos serão de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
Em todo e qualquer tipo de estudo que envolva situações de relato de caso clínico é fundamental o envio de cópia do Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido assinado(s) pelo(s) paciente(s).
