Uma filosofia para os romanos
Cícero e a Nova Academia
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.29327/rom.v26i.47613Mots-clés :
Filosofia romana, Nova Academia, Pro Murena, In Pisonem, De finibusRésumé
Nas últimas décadas, houve uma notável reavaliação de Cícero como um pensador significativo e um dos mais desafiadores, dada a variedade e a extensão dos seus escritos em diferentes gêneros literários e seu engajamento criativo com a filosofia helenística. A obra de Cícero fornece pistas essenciais para a compreensão da vida intelectual do Mediterrâneo e da Roma tardo-republicana, a circulação dos conhecimentos, sua produção e disseminação. Este artigo explorará alguns elementos da vida intelectual do período e do projeto filosófico ciceroniano com base em passagens de discursos forenses e diálogos filosóficos de Cícero.
Téléchargements
Références
Documentação textual
CASSIUS DIO. Roman History: Books 46–50. Translated by E. Cary. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1917. v. V.
CICERO. De natura deorum, Academica. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.
CICERO. On moral ends. Edited by Julia Annas and translated by Raphael Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
CICERO. Orations. In Catilinam 1–4. Pro Murena. Pro Sulla. Pro Flacco. Translated by C. Macdonald. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.
CICERO. Orations. Pro Milone. In Pisonem. Pro Scauro. Pro Fonteio. Pro Rabirio Postumo. Pro Marcello. Pro Ligario. Pro Rege Deiotaro. Translated by N. H. Watts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931.
CICÉRON. La nature des dieux. Traduit et commenté par Clara Auvray-Assayas. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2002.
FILODEMO. Epigrammi scelti: Anthologia Palatina. Edited by M. Gigante. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 1988.
MARCO TÚLIO CÍCERO. Os limites dos bens e dos males. Traduzido por Bruno Fregni Bassetto. Uberlândia: EDUFU, 2018.
PHILODÈME DE GADARA. Sur la mort: livre IV. Texte établi, traduit et annoté par Daniel Delattre. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2022.
PLUTARCH. Lives: Demosthenes and Cicero. Alexander and Caesar. Translated by B. Perrin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1919. v. II.
Obras de apoio
ADAMS, J. N. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
AUBERT-BAILLOT, S. Le grec et la philosophie dans la correspondance de Cicéron. Turnhout: Brepols, 2021.
AUVRAY-ASSAYAS, C. Cicéron. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2006.
BARAZ, Y. A written Republic: Cicero’s philosophical politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
BARNES, J.; GRIFFIN, M. (ed.). Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
BELTRÃO, C. ‘Species deorum’: imagens e conhecimento em Cícero. In: BELTRÃO, C.; SANTANGELO, F. (ed.). Estátuas na religião romana. Coimbra: Imprensa Universidade de Coimbra, 2020, p. 81-99.
BELTRÃO, C. Construindo a filosofia “clássica”: Cícero e o Epicurismo. Archai, n. 30, p. 1-24, 2020.
BELTRÃO, C. Mulheres intelectuais em Cícero: o caso de Caerellia. In: BELTRÃO, C.; CUCHET, V. S. (ed.). De caso a caso: a regra e a exceção. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra, 2024, p. 151-166.
BISHOP, C. Cicero, Greek learning, and the making of a Roman Classic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
BRITTAIN, C. Middle Platonists on Academic Scepticism. In: SHARPLES, R. W.; SORABJI, R. (ed.). Greek and Roman Philosophy (100 BC – 200 AD). London: University of London, 2007, p. 297-315. v. II.
BRITTAIN, C. Philo of Larissa: the last of the academic sceptics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
BRITTAIN, C.; OSORIO, P. The Ciceronian dialogue. In: ATKINS, J. W.; BÉNATOUÏL, T. (ed.). The Cambridge companion to Cicero’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, p. 25-42.
CAPELLO, O. The School of Doubt: Skepticism, History and Politics in Cicero’s Academica. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
CRAIG, C. P. Cato’s stoicism and the understanding of Cicero’s speech for Murena. Transactions of the American Philological Association, v. 116, p. 229-239, 1986.
DELATTRE, D. Vers une reconstruction de l’esthétique musicale de Philodème. In: AUVRAY-ASSAYAS, C.; DELATTRE, D. (ed.). Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris: Rue d’Ulm, 2001, p. 371-384.
DIELS, H. Doxographi Graeci. Berlin: G. Reimeri, 1879.
DILLON, J. M. The question of Eclecticism: studies in Late Greek Philosophy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988.
FERRARY, J.-L. Réponse à Carlos Lévy. In: AUVRAY-ASSAYAS, C.; DELATTRE, D. (ed.). Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris: Rue d’Ulm, 2001, p. 77-84.
FERRARY, J.-L. Réponse à Miriam Griffin. In: AUVRAY-ASSAYAS, C.; DELATTRE, D. (ed.). Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris: Rue d’Ulm, 2001, p. 101-105.
GIGANTE, M. Philodème dans l’histoire de la littérature grecque. In: AUVRAY-ASSAYAS, C.; DELATTRE, D. (ed.). Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris: Rue d’Ulm, 2001, p. 23-50.
GILBERT, N. Among friends: Cicero and the Epicureans. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2015.
GILDENHARD, I. Paideia romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
GORMAN, R. The Socratic method in the dialogues of Cicero. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2005.
GRIFFIN, M. Piso, Cicero and their Audience. In: AUVRAY-ASSAYAS, C.; DELATTRE, D. (ed.). Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris: Rue d’Ulm, 2001, p. 85-99.
GRIFFIN, M.; BARNES, J. (ed.). Philosophia togata I: essays on Philosophy and Roman society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
GURD, S. Work in progress, literary revision as social performance in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
HADDAD, A. B. O drama da recepção: Cícero e a Academia. Phoînix, v. 28, n. 2, p. 123-139, 2022.
HALL, J. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
HATZIMICHALI, M. The texts of Plato and Aristotle in the First Century BC. In: SCHOFIELD, M. (ed.). Aristotle, Plato, and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC: new directions for Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, p. 1-27.
HENDERSON, J. From ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦIΑ to PHILOSOPHIA: Classicism and Ciceronianism. In: PORTER, J. I. (ed.). Classical Pasts: the Classical tradition of Ancient Greece and Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006, p. 173-203.
HINE, H. Philosophy and philosophi: from Cicero to Apuleius. In: WILLIAMS, G. D.; VOLK, K. (ed.). Roman reflections: studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 13-29.
HOUSTON, G. W. Inside Roman libraries: book collections and their management in Antiquity. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2014.
HUTCHINSON, G. O. Greek into Latin: frameworks and contexts for intertextuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
JANKO, R. Philodème et l’esthétique de la poésie. In: AUVRAY-ASSAYAS, C.; DELATTRE, D. (ed.). Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris: Rue d’Ulm, 2001, p. 283-296.
KARAMANOLIS, G. E. Plato and Aristotle in agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
KÖNIG, J.; WOOLF, G. (ed.). Authority and expertise in Ancient scientific culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
KROSTENKO, B. A. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of social performance. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2001.
LEHOUX, D. What did the Romans know? An inquiry into science and worldmaking. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2012.
LÉVY, C. Cicero academicus: recherches sur les académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome: École Française de Rome, 1992.
LÉVY, C. Cicéron et l’épicurisme: la problématique de l’éloge paradoxal. In: AUVRAY-ASSAYAS, C.; DELATTRE, D. (ed.). Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris: Rue d’Ulm, 2001, p. 61-75.
LONG, A. A.; SEDLEY, D. The Hellenistic Philosophers I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
MASO, S. Cicero’s Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022.
MASO, S. Grasp and dissent: Cicero and Epicurean Philosophy. Turnhout: Brepols, 2015.
MCCONNELL, S. Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
MOATTI, C. La raison de Rome: naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République (IIe–Ier s. avant J.-C.). Paris: Seuil, 1997.
MOMMSEN, T. The History of Rome. London: R. Bentley, 1886.
MORELLO, R. Writer and Addressee in Cicero’s Letters. In: STEEL, C. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, p. 196-214.
POWELL, J. G. F. (ed.). Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
REINHARDT, T. Cicero’s Academic Skepticism. In: ATKINS, J. W.; BÉNATOUÏL, T. (ed.). The Cambridge companion to Cicero’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, p. 103-119.
SANT’ANGELO, M. N. E. De rerum natura: Lucrécio e a religião romana. Rio de Janeiro: Nau, 2024.
SCHOFIELD, M. Writing Philosophy. In: STEEL, C. (ed.). The Cambridge companion to Cicero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, p. 73-87.
SEDLEY, D. N. (ed.). The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
SEDLEY, D. Philosophical Allegiance in the Graeco-Roman World. In: GRIFFIN, M. T.; BARNES, J. (ed.). Philosophia togata I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, p. 97-119.
SKVIRSKY, A. Doubt and Dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica. Archai, n. 27, p. 1-21, 2019.
STROUP, S. C. Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons: the generation of the text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
TARRANT, H. Scepticism or Platonism? The Philosophy of the fourth academy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
TSOUNA, V. Cicéron et Philodème: quelques considérations sur l’éthique. In: AUVRAY-ASSAYAS, C.; DELATTRE, D. (ed.). Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie. Paris: Rue d’Ulm, 2001, p. 159-172.
USENER, H. Epicurea. Leipzig: Teubner, 1887.
VAN DER WALD, R. What a funny consul we have: Cicero’s dealing with Cato Uticensis and prominent friends in opposition. In: BOOTH, J. (ed.). Cicero on the Attack: invective and subversion in the orations and beyond. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 2007, p. 183-205.
VOLK, K. The Roman Republic of Letters: scholarship, philosophy, and politics in the Age of Cicero and Caesar. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.
VON ARNIM, H. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta: chrysippi fragmenta logica et physica. Leipzig: Teubner, 1903. v. II.
VON ARNIM, H. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta: chrysippi fragmenta moralia. Leipzig: Teubner, 1903. v. III.
VON ARNIM, H. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta: quo indices continentur. Leipzig: Teubner, 1924. v. IV.
VON ARNIM, H. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta: Zeno et zenonis discipuli. Leipzig: Teubner, 1905. v. I.
WHITE, P. Cicero in Letters: Epistolary Relations of the Late Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
WOOLF, R. Cicero: the Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. London: Routledge, 2015.
WOOLF, R. Cicero’s Academy Award. In: DIAZ, C.; SCHUBERT, C. (ed.). Zwischen Skepsis und Staatskult: neue perspektiven auf Ciceros ‘De natura deorum’. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2022, p. 129-146.
ZETZEL, J. E. Philosophy is in the streets. In: WILLIAMS, G. D.; VOLK, K. (ed.). Roman reflections: studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 50-82.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Claudia Beltrão 2025
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .
a. L’Auteur mantient les droits d’Auteur et accorde à la revue le droit de première publication.
b. L’Auteur a l’autorisation pour assumer des contrats additionnels séparément, pour distribution non exclusive de la version du travail publiée dans cette revue (ex.: publier en répertoire institutionnel ou comme chapitre de livre), avec reconnaissance de l’Auteur et publication initiale dans cette revue.
c. L’Auteur a l’autorisation et est encouragé à publier et distribuer leur travail en ligne (ex.: dans des répertoires institutionnels ou dans votre page personnelle) après la première publication par la revue, avec les créances.
d. Les textes de la revue sont publiés sous Licence CC BY 4.0 Deed Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY).
