Avaliação de desempenho e poder em relacionamentos interorganizacionais: uma revisão de literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/regec.2317-5087.2023.12.2.38864.27-47Palabras clave:
Avaliação de desempenho, Poder, Relacionamentos interorganizacionaisResumen
Ao estabelecer relações interorganizacionais, empresas podem ficar expostas às condutas oportunistas advindas da parte mais poderosa do relacionamento. Portanto, monitorar as atividades interorganizacionais pode ser um meio de minimizar tais condutas e garantir o desempenho relacional. Nessa perspectiva, este estudo objetiva verificar as características das pesquisas cientificas que abordam a temática avaliação de desempenho e poder em relacionamentos interorganizacionais (RIOs). Para seleção do portfólio bibliográfico, utilizou-se o instrumento de intervenção construtivista ProKnow-C. Os resultados permitem verificar que há uma tendência crescente de publicações que buscam disseminar conhecimento sobre a temática. A relação entre poder e desempenho nem sempre é observada sob o ponto de vista negativo, pois depende de outros fatores particulares do relacionamento, como confiança, justiça e dependência. Assim, investigar a influência de tais fatores no desempenho organizacional e interorganizacional em ambientes com assimetria de poder e abordar a visão de todas as partes relacionadas, sob diferentes graus de poder, configura oportunidades para pesquisas futuras. Da mesma forma, dado que os RIOs são singulares e variam conforme a conduta dos seus integrantes e demais variáveis internas e externas à relação, abordagens qualitativas e análises longitudinais podem permitir identificar possíveis interações positivas e negativas do poder no desempenho.
Descargas
Citas
Aprilianty, F., Aprianingsih, & Purwanegara M. S. (2018). Factors influencing supplier performance: eidence from farmers in West Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management 7(2), 150-158. [*]
Arzu Akyuz, G., & Erman Erkan, T. (2010). Supply chain performance measurement: a literature review. International journal of production research, 48(17), 5137-5155.
Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 275-292.
Benton, W. C., & Maloni, M. (2005). The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), 1-22. [*]
Bititci, U. S., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. S. (2012). Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 305-327.
Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge. Bortoluzzi, S. C., Ensslin, S. R., Ensslin, L., & Valmorbida, S. M. I. (2011). Avaliação de desempenho em redes de pequenas e médias empresas: estado da arte para as delimitações postas pelo pesquisador. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 4(2), 202-222.
Brinkhoff, A., Özer, Ö., & Sargut, G. (2015). All you need is trust? An examination of inter-organizational supply chain projects. Production and operations management, 24(2), 181-200. [*]
Brito, V. D. G. P., Brito, M. J., de, Capelle, M. C., & Borges, C. L. P. (2001). Relações de poder, conhecimento e gestão do desempenho. Revista de Administração Pública, 35(4), 45-62.
Brown, J. R., Lusch, R. F., & Nicholson, C. Y. (1995). Power and relationship commitment: their impact on marketing channel member performance. Journal of retailing, 71(4), 363-393.
Cai, S., & Yang, Z. (2008). Development of cooperative norms in the buyer‐supplier relationship: the Chinese experience. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(1), 55-70.
Cai, S., Goh, M., De Souza, R., & Li, G. (2013). Knowledge sharing in collaborative supply chains: twin effects of trust and power. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), 2060-2076. [*]
Castro, M. D., Bulgacov, S., & Hoffmann, V. E. (2011). Relacionamentos interorganizacionais e resultados: estudo em uma rede de cooperação horizontal da região central do Paraná. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 15(1), 25-46.
Chicksand, D. (2015). Partnerships: the role that power plays in shaping collaborative buyer-supplier exchanges. Industrial marketing management, 48, 121-139.
Cho, W., Ke, J. Y. F., & Han, C. (2019). An empirical examination of the use of bargaining power and its impacts on supply chain financial performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(4), 100-550. [*]
Choi, Y. K. (2014). A study on power generation analysis of floating PV system considering environmental impact. International journal of software engineering and its applications, 8(1), 75 84.
Chris, K., Asim, Z., & Lee, B. (2010). The analysis of complex governance system dynamics: emergent patterns of formation, operation and performance of regional planning networks. In Decision Theater Workshop on Policy Informatics. Arizona State University. Tempe, AZ.
Clauß, T. (2012). The influence of the type of relationship on the generation of innovations in buyer-supplier collaborations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(4), 388-411.
Clauss, T., & Bouncken, R. B. (2019). Social power as an antecedence of governance in buyer-supplier alliances. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 75-89. [*]
Cuevas, J. M., Julkunen, S., & Gabrielsson, M. (2015). Power symmetry and the development of trust in interdependent relationships: the mediating role of goal congruence. Industrial Marketing Management, 48, 149-159.
Cunha, C. R. D., & Melo, M. C. D. O. L. (2006). A confiança nos relacionamentos interorganizacionais: o campo da biotecnologia em análise. RAE eletrônica, 5(2).
Davis, S., & Albright, T. (2004). An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management accounting research, 15(2), 135-153.
Dekker, H. C. (2004). Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, organizations and society, 29(1), 27-49.
Dey, P. K., Bhattacharya, A., Ho, W., & Clegg, B. (2015). Strategic supplier performance evaluation: a case-based action research of a UK manufacturing organisation. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 192-214.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.
El-Ansary, A. I. (1975). Determinants of power-dependence in distribution channel. Journal of Retailing, 51(2), 59.
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American sociological review, 31-41.
Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2007). Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships. Administrative science quarterly, 52(1), 32-69. [*]
Gunasekaran, A., & Kobu, B. (2007). Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12), 2819-2840.
Hall, M. (2008). The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2-3), 141-163.
Handley, S. M., & Benton Jr, W. C. (2012). The influence of exchange hazards and power on opportunism in outsourcing relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1-2), 55-68.
Hansen, P. B. (2004). Um modelo meso-analítico de medição de desempenho competitivo de cadeias produtivas (Tese de Doutorado). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS.
He, Q., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, D. (2013). Knowledge acquisition in supply chain partnerships: the role of power. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(2), 605-618. [*]
Heide, J. B., & Miner, A. S. (1992). The shadow of the future: effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Academy of management journal, 35(2), 265-291.
Hicks, J. (1963). The theory of wages. Springer.
Hingley, M. K. (2005). Power imbalanced relationships: cases from UK fresh food supply. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(8), 551-569.
Hofmann, E., & Kotzab, H. (2010). A supply chain‐oriented approach of working capital management. Journal of business Logistics, 31(2), 305-330.
Horak, S., & Long, C. P. (2018). Dissolving the paradox: toward a Yin–Yang perspective on the power and trust antagonism in collaborative business relationships. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(6), 573-590. [*]
Hussain, M. M. (2005). Management accounting performance measurement systems in Swedish banks. European Business Review, 17(6), 566–589.
Jack, L., Florez-Lopez, R., & Ramon-Jeronimo, J. M. (2018). Accounting, performance measurement and fairness in UK fresh produce supply networks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 64, 17-30. [*]
Jain, M., Khalil, S., Johnston, W. J., & Cheng, J. M. S. (2014). The performance implications of power-trust relationship: the moderating role of commitment in the supplier-retailer relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 312-321. [*]
Keely, L. C., Sebastian, J. G. D., Douglas, M. L., & Dale, S. R. (2001). The supply chain management processes. International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(2), 13.
Kim, K. T., Lee, J. S., & Lee, S. Y. (2019). Chain reactions of a collaborative buyer–supplier relationship: the mediating role of relationship quality on innovation performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(11-12), 1319-1337. [*]
Korczynski, M. (1996). The low‐trust route to economic development: inter‐firm relations in the UK engineering construction industry in the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 787-808.
Lanier Jr, D., Wempe, W. F., & Swink, M. (2019). Supply chain power and real earnings management: stock market perceptions, financial performance effects, and implications for suppliers. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(1), 48-70. [*]
Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view. Academy of management review, 31(3), 638-658.
Li, T., Horton, R. M., Bader, D. A., Liu, F., Sun, Q., & Kinney, P. L. (2018). Longterm projections of temperature-related mortality risks for ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and acute ischemic heart disease under changing climate in Beijing, China. Environment international, 112, 1-9.
Liu, Y., Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Yang, Q. (2017). A diagnostic model of private control and collective control in buyer-supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 116-128. [*]
Maestrini, V., Luzzini, D., Caniato, F., Maccarrone, P., & Ronchi, S. (2018). The impact of supplier performance measurement systems on supplier performance: a dyadic lifecycle perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(11), 2040-2061.
Magretta, Joan, Stone, Nan. (2002). What is Management? New York: The Free Press.
Maloni, M., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of business logistics, 21(1), 49-74.
Melnyk, S. A., Bititci, U., Platts, K., Tobias, J., & Andersen, B. (2014). Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 173-186.
Mokhtar, A. R. M., Genovese, A., Brint, A., & Kumar, N. (2019). Improving reverse supply chain performance: the role of supply chain leadership and governance mechanisms. Journal of cleaner production, 216, 42-55. [*]
Mohamed, E. (2005). Impact of the nature & characteristics of organizations on nonfinancial performance measurement: the case of financial services industry. Journal of Case Research in Business and Economics, 1-17.
Muthusamy, S. K., & White, M. A. (2006). Does power sharing matter? The role of power and influence in alliance performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 811-819. [*]
Nudurupati, S. S., Bititci, U. S., Kumar, V., & Chan, F. T. (2011). State of the art literature review on performance measurement. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(2), 279-290.
Nyaga, G. N., Lynch, D. F., Marshall, D., & Ambrose, E. (2013). Power asymmetry, adaptation and collaboration in dyadic relationships involving a powerful partner. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(3), 42-65.
Patrucco, A. S., Moretto, A., & Knight, L. (2021). Does relationship control hinder relationship commitment? The role of supplier performance measurement systems in construction infrastructure projects. International journal of production economics, 233, 108000.
Pohlen, T. L., & Lambert, D. M. (2001). Supply chain metrics. The international journal of logistics management, 12(1), 1-19.
Qiu, T. (2018). Dependence concentration and fairness perceptions in asymmetric supplierbuyer relationships. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3-4), 395-419. [*]
Sahadev, S. (2005). Exploring the role of expert power in channel management: an empirical study. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5), 487-494.
Stock, R. M. (2006). Interorganizational teams as boundary spanners between supplier and customer companies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 588-599.
Tan, K. C., Kannan, V. R., & Handfield, R. B. (1998). Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 34(3), 2.
Tasca, J. E., Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., & Alves, M. B. M. (2010). An approach for selecting a theoretical framework for the evaluation of training programs. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34(7), 631-655.
Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M., & Gölgeci, I. (2013). Diffusion of environmental business practices: a network approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 264-275.
Taticchi, P., Balachandran, K., & Tonelli, F. (2012). Performance measurement and management systems: state of the art, guidelines for design and challenges. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(2), 41-54.
Valmorbida, S. M. I., & Ensslin, L. (2016). Construção de conhecimento sobre avaliação de desempenho para gestão organizacional: uma investigação nas pesquisas científicas internacionais. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 13(28), 123-148.
Valmorbida, S. M. I., & Ensslin, S. R. (2015). Avaliação de desempenho de rankings universitários: revisão da literatura e diretrizes para futuras investigações. Anais do XXXIX Encontro da ANPAD (EnANPAD 2015). Belo Horizonte, MG.
Wang, C. H. (2011). The moderating role of power asymmetry on the relationships between alliance and innovative performance in the high-tech industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(7), 1268-1279. [*]
Yan, A., & Gray, B. (1994). Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: a comparative case study. Academy of Management journal, 37(6), 1478-1517.
Zhao, X., Huo, B., Flynn, B. B., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2008). The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of operations management, 26(3), 368-388.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Os direitos autorais dos originais aprovados serão automaticamente transferidos à Revista, como condição para sua publicação, e para encaminhamentos junto às bases de dados de indexação de periódicos científicos.
Esta cessão passará a valer a partir da submissão do manuscrito, em formulário apropriado, disponível no Sistema Eletrônico de Editoração da Revista.
A revista se reservará o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos(as) autores(as).
Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos(às) autores(as), quando necessário. Nesses casos, os artigos, depois de adequados, deverão ser submetidos a nova apreciação.
As provas finais serão encaminhadas aos(às) autores(as).
Os trabalhos publicados passarão a ser de propriedade da Revista, ficando sua re-impressão (total ou parcial) sujeita à autorização expressa da Revista. Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação: Revista Gestão & Conexões.
A Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo e/ou quaisquer das instâncias editoriais envolvidas com o periódico não se responsabilizarão pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos. As opiniões emitidas pelos(as) autores(as) dos artigos serão de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
Em todo e qualquer tipo de estudo que envolva situações de relato de caso clínico é fundamental o envio de cópia do Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido assinado(s) pelo(s) paciente(s).
