Proceso de jerarquía analítica (AHP) y la definición de atributos para apoyar la toma de decisiones: un análisis bibliométrico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v7i5.36744Palabras clave:
Acoplamiento bibliométrico; Bibliometría; Cocitación; Co-ocurrencia; Web de la Ciencia.Resumen
Debido a su alta flexibilidad y amplia aplicabilidad, los diferentes caminos tomados y puntos de vista sobre el Proceso de Jerarquía Analítica (AHP) se han estudiado extensamente en la literatura durante los últimos 50 años. En el momento de redactar este trabajo, no existía un análisis bibliométrico sobre el estado del arte de cómo se definen y miden los criterios en el uso de AHP para la gestión de actividades y operaciones. Así, realizamos una revisión en la base de datos Web of Science (WoS), utilizando artículos de investigación aplicada, publicados entre 1970 y 2020. Se utilizaron aspectos como la estructura de citas y publicaciones para organizar la realización de la estimación de la evolución literaria a través del software Zotero. . Luego empleamos el software VOSviewer para mapear la coexistencia y la co-ocurrencia. Los resultados muestran un aumento gradual en la estructura de citas y publicaciones, además de usos y aplicaciones híbridas, destacando el AHP como un elemento importante para la academia y también para el avance del conocimiento sobre la ayuda a la toma de decisiones. Este trabajo contribuye a la ciencia identificando prácticas en el uso de AHP, ayudando a diferentes personas interesadas en el tema a comprender los diferentes caminos y enfoques dados a los aspectos de uso.
Descargas
Citas
Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013.
Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Passaro, R. (2012). AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: problems and perspectives. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 18(3), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.05.001.
Cebrino, J., & Portero De La Cruz, S. (2020). A worldwide bibliometric analysis of published literature on workplace violence in healthcare personnel. PLoS one, 15(11), e0242781. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242781.
Chan, F. T. S., & Chan, H. K. (2004). Development of the supplier selection model – a case study in the advanced technology industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B – Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 4(3), 1807-1824. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440540421801213.
Demuner, M. T., Zatta, F. N., Freitas, R. R., & Goncalves, W. (2020). Multidimensional approach to elaborate strategic map in small businesses through the integration BSC-AHP. Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering, 6(3), 57-74. Recuperado de https://www.periodicos.ufes.br/bjpe/article/view/29290.
Dey, P. K., & Cheffi, W. (2013). Green supply chain performance measurement using the analytic hierarchy process: a comparative analysis of manufacturing organisations. Production Planning & Control, 24(8-9), 702-720. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2012.666859.
Fouladgar, M. M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Lashgari, A., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2012). Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment. International journal of strategic property management, 16(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2012.666657.
Friendly, A. (2019). The contradictions of participatory planning: Reflections on the role of politics in urban development in Niterói, Brazil. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(7), 910-929. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1569468.
Gonçalves, W. (2016). Integração de Técnicas de Análise Multivariada e Método Multicritério para Localização de Centros de Distribuição (Tese de doutorado). Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba, Santa Bárbara D’Oeste, SP, Brasil. Recuperado de https://iepapp.unimep.br/biblioteca_digital/pdfs/docs/18112016_160918_wellingtongoncalves_ok.pdf.
Gora, A. A. (2019). The Link Between Decision Making Process and Performance: A Bibliometric Analysis. Management and Economics Review, 4(2), 177-191. Recuperado de http://mer.ase.ro/files/2019_2/4-8.pdf.
Ho, W., Dey, P. K., & Lockström, M. (2011). Strategic sourcing: a combined QFD and AHP approach in manufacturing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 446-461. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111171093.
Ho, W., & Ma, X. (2018). The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 399-414, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007.
Kou, G., & Lin, C. (2014). A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 225-232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.019.
Kubler, S., Robert, J., Derigent, W., Voisin, A., & Le Traon, Y. (2016). A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 65, 398-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.064.
Martins, C. L., López, H. M. L., Almeida, A. T., Almeida, J. A., & Oliveira Bortoluzzi, M. B. (2017). An MCDM project portfolio web-based DSS for sustainable strategic decision making in an electricity company. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(7), 1362-1375. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2016-0412.
Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004.
Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., & Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001.
Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2002). A multi‐criteria group decisionmaking model for supplier rating. Journal of supply chain management, 38(3), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00140.x.
Ossadnik, W., Schinke, S., & Kaspar, R. H. (2016). Group aggregation techniques for analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: a comparative analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(2), 421-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9448-4.
Petruni, A., Giagloglou, E., Douglas, E., Geng, J., Leva, M. C., & Demichela, M. (2019). Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to choose a human factors technique: Choosing the suitable Human Reliability Analysis technique for the automotive industry. Safety Science, 119, 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.007.
Podgórski, D. (2015). Measuring operational performance of OSH management system–A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety science, 73, 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.018.
Qaiser, F. H., Ahmed, K., Sykora, M., Choudhary, A., & Simpson, M. (2017). Decision support systems for sustainable logistics: a review and bibliometric analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(7), 1376-1388. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2016-0410.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.
_______. (1991). Método de análise hierárquica. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill, Makron Books.
_______. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSci.2008.017590.
Sánchez, A. D., Del Río, M. D. L. C., & García, J. Á. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases Scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.02.001.
Santos, P. H., Neves, S. M., Sant’Anna, D. O., Oliveira, C. H., & Carvalho, H. D. (2019). The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of cleaner production, 212, 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.270.
Webb, M. J. (2018). Estimating Uncertainty Attributable to Inconsistent Pairwise Comparisons in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) - (Tese de doutorado). George Washington University, Washington, 2018.
Yadav, V., & Sharma, M. K. (2016). Multi-criteria supplier selection model using the analytic hierarchy process approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(1), 326-354. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-06-2014-0052.
Yahya, S., & Kingsman, B. (1999). Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: a case study using the analytic hierarchy process method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(9), 916-930, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600797.
Zatta, F. N., Mattos, A. L., Oliveira, R. R., Freitas, R. R., & Gonçalves, W. (2019). Aplicação do Analytic Hierarchy Process na escolha de planos de saúde. Research, Society and Development, 8(1), p. e1881532, https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v8i1.532.
Zhou, S., & Yang, P. (2020). Risk management in distributed wind energy implementing Analytic Hierarchy Process. Renewable Energy, 150, 616-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.125.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering - BJPE
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
![](https://periodicos.ufes.br/public/site/images/revistabjpe/lateral-siteindexadores-16.png)
Atribuição 4.0 internacional CC BY 4.0 Deed
Esta licença permite que outros remixem, adaptem e desenvolvam seu trabalho não comercialmente, contanto que eles creditem a você e licenciem suas novas criações sob os mesmos termos.