SCHEMACITY AND EMULATION

REFINING THE DEFINITION OF IMAGE SCHEMA THROUGH THE ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO LANGUAGE AND COGNITION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/cl.v14i29.32329

Keywords:

Schemacity, Schematisation, Emulation, Primary Metaphor

Abstract

One of the basilar concepts in Cognitive Linguistics’ bibliography is that of the image schema (see LAKOFF, 1987; JOHNSON, 1987; TURNER, 1991; GIBBS; COLSTON, 1995; etc.). Having faced an almost discordant variety of definitions for the schemas, Grady proposes a theoretical refinement. With the same objective, this paper proposes a refined definition, which can be based on the ecological approach to language and cognition (DUQUE, 2016, 2017, 2018). Hence, the schemas are to be characterized as mechanisms which emerge from a symbiotic organism-environment relation. Thus, we present schemacity and schematisation as new theoretical models for approaching the schemas. Furthermore, our refinement inevitably crosses the way of the concept of the primary metaphor. Therefore, through the hypothesis of emulation (DUQUE, 2016), we discuss the primary metaphor DIFFICULTY IS HEAVINESS, by presenting a more dynamic approach, which entails a direct relation between this metaphor and the process of schematization. We also discuss briefly the relation between emulation and our neural circuitry, by considering the studies of the ecological psychology (GOLONKA; WILSON, 2016) and the Neural Theory of Metaphor (see LAKOFF, 2008).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcos Rodrigues, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)

Graduando em Letras-Inglês pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grand do Norte (UFRN); possui formação técnica em Mecatrônica pelo Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (IFRN). É bolsista PIBIC-UFRN.

Ilana Medeiros, Universidade Potiguar (UnP)

Doutora e mestra em Estudos da Linguagem (linguística teórica e descritiva) pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN); especialista em Fundamentos Linguísticos para o Ensino da Leitura e da Escrita pela UFRN e em Psicopedagogia Institucional pela Universidade Anhanguera (Uniderp); graduada em Letras - Língua Francesa e Literaturas pela UFRN e em Pedagogia pela Universidade Potiguar (UnP). É professora da Escola de Ciências Aplicadas, Educação, Artes e Humanidades da UnP.

Paulo Henrique Duque, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)

Doutor e mestre em Linguística pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ); graduado em Letras – Português/Inglês e Literaturas pelo Centro de Ensino Superior de Valença. É professor do Departamento de Letras e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos da Linguagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN).

References

DUQUE, P. H. A emergência do comportamento linguístico. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem - ReVEL, Porto Alegre, v. 14, n. 27, p. 151-172, ago., 2016.

DUQUE, P. H. De perceptos a frames: Cognição Ecológica e Linguagem. Revista Scripta, Belo Horizonte, v. 21, n. 41, p. 21-45, jan./jul. 2017.

DUQUE, P. H. Percepção, Linguagem e Construção de Sentidos: por uma abordagem ecológica da cognição. In: TENUTA, A. M.; COELHO, S. M. (Orgs.). Uma Abordagem Cognitiva da Linguagem: perspectivas teóricas e descritivas. Belo Horizonte: FALE/UFMG, 2018. p. 31-46.

EDELMAN, G.; TONONI, G. A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. New York: Basic Books, 2000.

FODOR, J.; PYLYSHYN, Z. Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis. Cognition, v. 28, n. 1-2, p. 3-71, mar. 1998.

GALLESE, V.; LAKOFF, G. The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-Motor System in Conceptual Knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, v. 22, n. 3-4, p. 455-479, mai. 2005.

GIBSON, J. J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. 2. ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986 [1979].

GIBBS, R. The Poetics of Mind: The figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

GIBBS, R.; COLSTON, H. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, Berlin, v. 6, n. 4, p. 347-378, set. 1995.

GOLONKA; S.; WILSON, A. Ecological Representations. bioRxiv, Leeds, v. 2, jun. 2016.

GOPNIK, A. The Philosophical Baby: What Children’s Minds Tell Us About Truth, Love, and the Meaning of Life. London: Bodley Head, 2009.

GRADY, J. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. 1997. 299 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia da Linguística) – University of California. Berkley, 1997.

GRADY, J. Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In: HAMPE, B. (Ed.). From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. p. 35-55.

HAMPE, B. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction. In: HAMPE, B. (Eds.). From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. p. 1-15.

HEBB, D. O. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley, 1949.

JOHNSON, M. The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.

JOHNSON, M. The philosophical significance of image schemas. In: HAMPE, B. (Ed.). From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. p. 15-33.

LAKOFF, G. Women fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. 1. ed. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

LAKOFF, G. The neural theory of metaphor. In: GIBBS, R. (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. p.17-39.

NARAYANAN, S. Knowledge-based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect (KARMA). 1997. 290 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia, área de Ciência da Computação) – University of California. Berkley, 1997.

TURNER, M. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Sciences. 1. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.

Published

30-12-2020