THE PARTIAL PRODUCTIVITY OF GRAMMATICAL CONSTRUCTIONS

AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION INTO BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE CLAUSAL COMPLEMENTATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47456/cl.v14i28.31280

Keywords:

Clausal complementation, Semantic knowledge, Entrenchment, Statistical preemption

Abstract

How do speakers retreat from overgeneralization? In Usage-Based Construction Grammar, three answers have been offered: (i) speakers rely on general grammatical knowledge; (ii) speakers rely on item-based statistical knowledged in terms of entrenchment; (iii) speakers rely on item-based statistical knowledge in terms of preemption. In order to probe into the psychological validity of these explanations, this paper focuses on the Brazilian Portuguese Clausal Complementation Construction (e.g. “Ela disse que estava bem” ‘She said that she was fine’). After a corpus-based analysis, from which we derive three specific hypothesis concerning the representation of the underlying constructional network, an elicited production experiment was carried out where subjects were asked to watch short videos and answer intepretive questions. The results suggest that grammatical (semantic) knowledge and entrenchment play an important role in the retreat from overgeneralization; on the other hand, no evidence was found to support statistical preemption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dayanne de Oliveira Ximenes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)

Mestra em Linguística pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ); graduada em Letras - Português/Espanhol pela mesma instituição.

Diogo Pinheiro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)

Doutor em Linguística pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ); mestre em Língua Portuguesa pela mesma instituição; graduado em Letras - Português/Latim pela UFRJ. É professor da Faculdade de Letras e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da UFRJ.

References

AMBRIDGE, B. How do children restrict their linguistic generalizations?: an (un-) grammaticality judgment study. Cognitive Science, v. 37, n. 3, p. 508-543, dez. 2013.

AMBRIDGE, B.; BIDGOOD, A; TWOMEY, K. E.; PINE, J. M.; ROWLAND, C. F.; FREUDENTHAL, D. Preemption versus entrenchment: Towards a construction-general solution to the problem of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization. PLoS ONE, v. 10, n. 4, p. 1-20, abr. 2015.

AMBRIDGE, B.; PINE, J. M.; ROWLAND, C. F.; YOUNG, C. R. The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, v. 106, n. 1, p. 87-129, jan. 2008.

AMBRIDGE, B.; GOLDBERG, A. E. The island status of clausal complements: Evidence in favor of an information structure explanation. Cognitive Linguistics, v. 19, n. 3, p. 349–382, set. 2008.

BOYD, J. K.; GOLDBERG, A. E. Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, v. 87, n. 1, p. 55-83, mar.2011.

DABROWSKA, E. Recycling utterances: A speaker’s guide to sentence processing. Cognitive Linguistics, v. 25, n. 4, p. 617-653, out. 2014.

GOLDBERG, A. E. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University Press, 1995.

HILPERT, M. Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh University Press, 2014.

PEREK, F.; GOLDBERG, A. E. Linguistic generalization on the basis of function and constraints on the basis of statistical preemption. Cognition, v. 168, p. 276-293, nov. 2017.

ROSANEN, S. H. M., AMBRIDGE, B.; PINE, J. M. An elicited-production study of inflectional verb morphology in child Finnish. Cognitive Science, v. 40, n. 7, p. 1-35, nov. 2016.

ROBENALT, C.; GOLDBERG, A. E. Judgment evidence for statistical preemption: It is relatively better to vanish than to disappear a rabbit, but a lifeguard can equally well backstroke or swim children to shore. Cognitive Linguistics, v. 26, n. 3, p. 467-504, jun. 2015.

Published

14-10-2020