O futuro não é o que costumava ser
Uma perspectiva sistêmica para a construção de conhecimento
Palavras-chave:
Conhecimento, Produtividade, Criatividade, Ecossistemas CriativosResumo
Este artigo examina o processo criativo de construção de conhecimento por meio de um ponto de vista sistêmico. Primeiro, exploraremos as práticas humanas antigas para destacar a importância de estruturas flexíveis com funções circunstanciais no desenvolvimento social e intelectual. Em seguida, abordamos como as práticas industriais influenciaram os negócios, a educação e o desenvolvimento profissional, promovendo o individualismo. Por fim, discutiremos como o conceito de ecossistema criativo pode nos ajudar a entender nosso contexto e a enfrentar os desafios sociais de forma mais eficaz no futuro.
Downloads
Referências
ALBISETTI, J. C. National Education Systems: Europe. In: RURY, J. L.; TAMURA, E. H. (Eds.). London: Oxford University Press, 2019.
ALLEN, D. Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity. New York: Penguin Books, 2015.
BLOOM, N. et al. Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? American Economic Review, v. 110, p. 1104–1144, 2020.
BOGALE, A.; KENENISA, D. Organizational culture: a systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, v. 11, p. 2340129, 2024.
BROOKS, F. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. New York: Pearson Education, 1995.
CHARNAS, I. Inbox Zero: How to Stop Checking Email and Start Finishing It. New York: Inbox Zero Solutions, 2018.
CHILDE, V. G. Man Makes Himself. London: Watts, 1936.
CHILDE, V. G. The Urban Revolution. The Town Planning Review, v.21, p. 3–17, 1950.
CLASTRES, P. La Société contre l’état. Paris : Editions de Minuit, 1974.
COLLINS, R. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.
DE LOECKER, J., & SYVERSON, C. An industrial organization perspective on productivity. In K. HO, A. HORTAÇSU, & A. LIZZERI (Eds.). New York: Elsevier, 2021.
DOBLINGER, M. Individual Competencies for Self-Managing Team Performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Small Group Research, v. 53, p. 128–180, 2022.
DRUCKER, P. Landmarks of Tomorrow: A Report on the New. New York: Transaction Publishers, 2011.
ELIADE, M. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. London: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1959.
ERICKSON, A. T. The Urban History of Education. In: RURY, J. L.; TAMURA, E. H. (Eds.). London: Oxford University Press, 2019.
FLORIDA, R. The Rise of the Creative Class. London: Hachette UK, 2019.
FORD, H.; CROWTHER, S. My Life and Work. London: Doubleday, Page, 1922.
GRAEBER, D. Bullshit Jobs: A Theory. London: Simon and Schuster, 2019.
GRAEBER, D.; WENGROW, D. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. London: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021.
GRUBER, H. Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
GRUBER, H., & WALLACE, D. B. Creative People at Work: Twelve Cognitive Case Studies. London: Oxford University Press, 1989.
GUILFORD, J. P. Creativity: Retrospect and Prospect. The Journal of Creative Behavior, v.4, p. 149–168, 1970.
GUTIERREZ-BRAOJOS, C., et al. Exploring Collective Cognitive Responsibility Through the Emergence and Flow of Forms of Engagement in a Knowledge Building Community. In L. DANIELA (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, 2019.
HANCHETT HANSON, M. Worldmaking: Psychology and the Ideology of Creativity. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015.
HANCHETT HANSON, M., & CLAPP, E. P. (2020). Participatory Creativity. In S. PRITZKER & M. RUNCO (Eds.). New York: Academic Press, 2020.
HARRIS, D. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. New York: National Academies Press, 1994.
HEADLEE, C. Do Nothing: Break Away from Overworking, Overdoing and Underliving. London : Hachette UK, 2020.
HOCART, A. Social Origins. London: Watts, 1954.
HONG, R. et al. Impact of Cultural Individualism and Collectivism on Protean and Boundaryless Career Attitudes and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Career Development, v. 49, p. 218–231, 2022.
ILLICH, I. Deschooling Society. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
JACOBS, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books, 1961.
JONES, B. F. The Burden of Knowledge and the “Death of the Renaissance Man”: Is Innovation Getting Harder? The Review of Economic Studies, v. 76, p. 283–317, 2009.
KAUFFMAN, S. A. Humanity in a Creative Universe. London: Oxford University Press, 2016.
KIM, R. C. Rethinking corporate social responsibility under contemporary capitalism: Five ways to reinvent CSR. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, v. 31, p. 346–362, 2022.
KUNZ, J. Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees Motivation—Broadening the Perspective. Schmalenbach Business Review, v. 72, p. 159–191, abr. 2020.
LANDRY, C. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. New York: Earthscan, 2012.
LOWIE, R. Some Aspects of Political Organization Among the American Aborigines. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, v. 78, p. 11–24, 1948.
MARTELA, F.; PESSI, A. B. Significant Work Is About Self-Realization and Broader Purpose: Defining the Key Dimensions of Meaningful Work. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 9, 2018.
MORIN, E. On Complexity. London: Hampton Press, 2008.
NEWPORT, C. Slow Productivity: The Lost Art of Accomplishment Without Burnout. New York: Portfolio, 2024.
OLDENBURG, R. The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. New York: Marlowe, 1998.
PETERSEN, A. H. Can’t Even: How Millennials Became the Burnout Generation. New York: Mariner Books, 2020.
POWELL, K. Work–life balance: Break or burn out. Nature, v. 545, p. 375–377, 2017.
RYAZANOVA, O.; JASKIENE, J. Managing individual research productivity in academic organizations: A review of the evidence and a path forward. Research Policy, v. 51, p. 104448, mar. 2022.
SAHLINS, M. Notes on the Original Affluent Society. In: LEE, R.; DEVORE, I. (Eds.). London: Aldine, 1968.
SCARDAMALIA, M., & BEREITER, C. Schools as Knowledge-Building Organizations. In D. KEATING & C. HERTZMAN (Eds.), New York: Guilford, 1999.
SCARDAMALIA, M., & BEREITER, C. Knowledge Building. In Encyclopedia of Education. New York: Macmillan Reference, 2003.
SCARDAMALIA, M., & BEREITER, C. A Brief History of Knowledge Building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 2010.
SCARDAMALIA, M., & BEREITER, C. Knowledge Building: Advancing the State of Community Knowledge. In U. CRESS, C. ROSÉ, A. F. WISE, & J. OSHIMA (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 2021.
STERNBERG, R. J. Varieties of Transformational and Transactional Creativity. In: STERNBERG, R. J.; KARAMI, S. (Eds.). New York: Springer International Publishing, 2024.
STERNBERG, R. J.; KARAMI, S. (EDS.). Transformational Creativity: Learning for a Better Future. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2024.
SYLVA, H. et al. Person-job fit and proactive career behaviour: A dynamic approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, v. 28, p. 631–645, 2019.
UZZI, B., MUKHERJEE, S., STRINGER, M., & JONES, B. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science (New York, N.Y.), v. 342, p. 468–472, 2013.
UZZI, B., & SPIRO, J. Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem. American Journal of Sociology, v.111, p. 447–504, 2005.
ZAMANA, F. Creative Ecosystem Framework: A Case Study of World Creativity Day. Revista Ibero-Americana de Criatividade e Inovação - RECRIAI, v. 2, p. 134–150, 2021.
ZAMANA, F. (2022). Taking Creativity Seriously: Why your ideas are more about us than about you. São Paulo: Câmara Brasileira do Livro, 2022.
ZELENYUK, V. Productivity analysis: roots, foundations, trends and perspectives. Journal of Productivity Analysis, v. 60, p. 229–247, 2023.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Felipe Zamana
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os autores de trabalhos submetidos à Revista Farol autorizam sua publicação em meio físico e eletrônico, unicamente para fins acadêmicos, podendo ser reproduzidos desde que citada a fonte. Os mesmos, atestam sua orignalidade, autoria e ineditismo.
